How Awesome Is It To See Obama Finally Held Accountable For The Russia Hoax?

[Billlewis]

As someone who has dated Black women exclusively for more than thirty years, and was unfortunate enough to have been living in Chicago during the 'Obamamania' phenomenon that swept across the world during 2008/09, I only wish I had a dollar for every time someone said to me, 'You just don't like him 'cause he's Black'. No, I don't like him because he holds the distinction of hating this country more than any other human being that has ever walked the earth. Apparently, in Europe and the U. K., they still view him as the second coming of Jesus Christ.

Updates

1 y

This is so predictable; men are largely pleased that this travesty is finally being addressed, while women continue to defend 0bama to the very end. I guess some of us would rather try to defend the indefensible.

Updates

11 mo

www.realclearpolitics.com/.../...b_in_history.html

[Beckybooboo]

What I don't understand, Bill, is Robert Mueller wrote in his report, that he found Russia was influencing the election in Trump's favor. Now classified documents show that's NOT what the intelligence community found. Where/how did Mueller come to an opposite conclusion?

[Billlewis]

In a case like this, the argument comes down to semantics; if the alleged influencing resulted in just one person, of the 150 million or so who voted, to vote for Trump instead of 'Shrillery', then Mueller was technically being truthful, right? That's an oft used tactic by someone who doesn't have a credible argument -- take one small grain of truth, one anomaly among millions, and then claim that it represents the entire equation. If I only have a one in three hundred million statistical likelihood of winning ten million dollars in the lottery, I should run out and spend my entire paycheck on lottery tickets, because technically, it is possible that I could win. That is a rough summation of Mueller's, and the Left's argument in this case.

[Beckybooboo]

I get it but according to reporting, the Intel community found there was no credible interference that made a difference in the election or that favored Trump, correct? So why did Mueller document just the opposite? It makes me wonder if he even had access to Intel documents or just took certain people's word for it. in my opinion, that's the biggest issue! It was also reported that Putin was behind it but intelligence said, "with great confidence" he wasn't. I think Mueller needs some 'splaining to do!

[Billlewis]

He said what he said for the same reason that the investigation was kept in place until well after the 2018 midterm elections -- because it's purpose was to thwart the president's agenda, period. Outside of that, I have no credible answer for you, because there is none.

[Beckybooboo]

We're on the same side, Bill, my problem is, the Mueller report is the only reason there's any thought of Trump colluding with Russia but if the latest revolution is true, Mueller's report is null and void! Which it was pretty obvious during his testimony before Congress, he really didn't even take part in the investigation. I'm just curious as to why people aren't talking about that. Maybe I'm not thinking appropriately but politics is new to me. GFY, sissy!

[Beckybooboo]

Now some of the players are saying Durham's report is based on "Russian (mis) disinformation"! You would think the "journalist's" would be offended they played part in a hoax, a lie but they're right alongside Brenner and Comey perpetrating the next "laptop" or "Steele dossier" lie.

[Beckybooboo]

An fyi, I have a lot of respect Turley.

[Amy10223]

The Mueller report, which is more credible than whoever or wherever you heard this from, was not a hoax. There was Russian interference which did not get the attention it should have.

[Billlewis]

Like everyone else here, you are entitled to your opinion.

[Amy10223]

Yes, like others here, I am also entitled to read truth and not listen to lies as well.

[Amy10223]

Both you and Beckyboo, have no idea what was inside the Mueller Report, because you didn't read it. Therefore, you should not be talking about it as if you have, and not come up with other assumptions as well. Just my opinion.

[Beckybooboo]

@amy10223 Ask me anything you want to know about Mueller's report. I probably know more than he does!

[Beckybooboo]

@amy10223 Are you even from the United States? Mueller testified, before Congress, for almost six hours about his report.

[Amy10223]

@Beckybooboo --Oh, you know more than Robert Mueller does, in his two years of work on it? I seriously doubt that. Yes, I am American. I know exactly what was in the Mueller Report, which is why I do not trust Trump at all. And if you were to have read it, you would agree as well, unless you aLso are brainwashed as the rest of Trump supporters.

[Amy10223]

Thanks for the MHO!!!

[Beckybooboo]

Can you tell me why Mueller reached the conclusion that Russia was conspiring in the 2016 election in Trump's favor, even though new declassified documents from OUR intelligence agencies said they are "confident" it wasn't the case? That's the only question I asked, so, if you know the answer, I greatly appreciate it.

[Amy10223]

@Beckybooboo For one thing--Trump refused to be interviewed by Mueller many times. He only answer questions that were sent to him by Mueller--but not in a courtroom. Why? His team, knew he would not do well enough to defend himself.
Mueller found that many Russian oligarchs attended his first inauguration, with no one knowing who they were and why they were invited. You can google his ties to Russia, and you win find plenty of information one that. Mueller stopped one of those oligarchs in a car at an airport here in America, and yet he unable to question him because he was running out of time with his report.
Thirdly, as Mueller stated in the Mueller Report conclusion:
"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgement, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgmenrt. At the same time, IF we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate it. "

Take that as you may. Mueller had to word that carefully because Trump was a "sitting president" and normally sitting presidents are not touched in courts--although they can be. His report was not given the credit nor the time---if you remember how nasty the GOP congressman who questioned Mueller on the stand were--and downplayed everything he said. And Barr did not help by making it sound like there was nothing in the report that stood out.

Thanks for the MHO!!!

[Amy10223]

swalwell.house.gov/.../russia-trump-his-administration-s-ties

[Beckybooboo]

You're conflating two separate issues! Obstruction has nothing to do with the underlying crime. Also, I would like you to give me his ties to Russia, because they don't exist beyond a normal noncriminal scope, as Mueller testified to.

[Beckybooboo]

🤦 I guess you haven't gotten the memo! First of all, Slimewall and his sidekick, Adam Schiff, are the two most discredited congressmen in Congress and second of all, Mueller's report showed there was "NO CONSPIRACY" between Trump and Putin! Again, my question is, how did Mueller and the United States intelligence community reach two different conclusions. Let me ask you this, do you think Trump is still a "Russian agent"? Do you still think Hunter Biden's laptop is "Russian dis (mis) information? Do you still think Joe Biden is cognitively fine and was actually running the country?

[Beckybooboo]

I will also add, Mueller was under NO time constraint. Where did you come up with that?

[Lliam]

Yeah, he was planted by friends of Israel and enemies of the U. S. I'd like to see him tried for crimes against humanity.

[Billlewis]

I know, right? I believe that he both deported and bombed more people than any other president, but the media won't cover it.

[robocop666]

He is an illegal immigrant from Kenya and said on tv that his sister is Kenyan. He is a muslim and gay.

[Billlewis]

Yes. Wasn't there a scandal that had to do with his brother getting deported, or almost deported? I can't remember.

[robocop666]

news to me however with the USA having a border live a sieve does not surprise me.

[Billlewis]

That's an insult to hard working sieves everywhere... lol. What makes it even more reprehensible is that after they stole the 2020 election, using the scamdemic, they actually went down to Southern Texas, etc, and took down large sections of the wall/fence, to let as many migrants -- not one of whom was coerced into taking the shots -- in as possible.

[Anonymous]

It's funny how Trump tries to scream about Obama to distract everyone from Epstein and you all mindlessly parrot it. Suddenly we have 3 Obama questions in one day lol. The pitiful attempt to distract us isn't working!

[Surely]

I guess that we need to wait and see what they can prove on Obama. Things will disappear like a fart in a hurricane!

[Billlewis]

True, but that's not really the point, as far as I'm concerned, because in the current environment, it's not really feasible to put the nation's first Black president behind bars, no matter the transgression. Doing so could potentially spark a backlash worse than the Roe vs. Wade dumbassery of a few years ago. No, the benefit of a very public spectacle, in which his cynical machinations are finally exposed for all to see, pours cold water on the typical revisionist history that the regressive left would have undoubtedly implemented for years to come: 'He was a true visionary, who united the country and brought us to a better place...', etc. It'll be a lot harder to canonize him as saint after this.

[Avicenna]

Well, he should be held accountable but the chances of it occurring are still almost zero

[Avicenna]

by the way, Obama was popular in Europe solely because he was a traitor. Europeans like it when Americans serve European interests, not US interests.

[XXblack88]

I didn't see it but if true very awesome

[Billlewis]

It's all over the internet and YouTube. What most white folks don't realize is the staggering degree of damage the Obama era has inflicted on the Black community. BLM alone has resulted in tens of thousands of African Americans murdered who would be alive today, were it not for this woke nonsense and defund the police, etc.

[XXblack88]

cool

[kavakava]

Nothing will happen to him but I like to think he's going to squirm a bit.

[Billlewis]

Oh, yeah -- you know damn well he won't serve a single day behind bars, but this will make it a little harder to say with a straight face that he somehow united the country, etc, in the future.

[Alex-Snow]

Yet another Trump way of creating chaos when the shit is hitting the fan on him.

[Dongie]

All this and he wasn't even born here. I will celebrate if it happens.

[Dargil]

Obama was our Manchurian Candidate

[DrPepper12]

Obama hated USA the mostest? Ok.

[Dongie]

🎤 Your thoughts on the big political hit job, pulled by the corrupt Obama gang, Doc?

[DrPepper12]

I'll let comer handle it.