
yes
no
They should use live ammo
I don't know
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age

FreyaRed wants to hear from Guys only. Login to share your opinion.
Where exactly is the use of nonlethal ammunition gonna be useful with someone swimming the Rio Grande? It could turn lethal real fast, intentionally or unintentionally if you start bombarding marginal swimmers in a river with no target other than their heads.
I'm ok with it.
Look, my sympathies are for MY OWN COUNTRY and OUR CITIZENS.
I'm sorry your life in your country has you dreaming of moving to my country. That doesn't mean I want to let everyone move here.
The answer is NO. You cannot move here. With the exception of some WELL VETTED thousands. Maybe 10,000 for an entire year. Maybe 50,000 the answer should be NO to the millions of others.
Why not just kill them? They kill them indirectly anyway so it seems more optimal to kill any illegal trying to cross. But ya know the US government could also kill the cartel if they want to be effective which clearly effectiveness is not in their goal.
All the gun love cult show their true colours with their demeaning of others seeking economic benefit THAT THEIR OWN SORTS want to work for below market value.
Odd too that their Tangerine messiah in the white house has just enacted a great United Socialist move of governmental take over of private enterprise. How conflicted they must be now given the trauma of their saviour going right up against their primary ideology...
If they are ANY refugees (civilians fleeing) then the Law of armed conflict gives no one the right to inflict harm on them because they "aren't like us". It is necessary to protect them as if they were fleeing persecution UNTIL you can prove otherwise. You don't get to assume they are a threat just because you're a bigot. Civilisation has evolved to be able to have the self control and compassion to treat others with the respect they'd hope to be treated with in reverse.
The border patrol should use live ammo, those invaders had that coming to them.
Definitely, but not exclusively. We know for certain that there are violent criminals coming into the country illegally. If they use violence against border patrol, the agents should be allowed to meet force with force.
If they TRY, no. If they make it and must be apprehended, yes.
Most of the border between the U. S. and Mexico doesn't even have a fence. Something like only 700 miles of fence on a 1900 mile border. Most of that is desert that will kill you in the summer. They can't patrol all that.
The goal is to stop them from illegally entering the country. Using non-lethal bullets is a reasonsble tool to do that.
i mean if illegal border crossing can't effectively be prevented otherwise, sure.
Lethal, non lethal? Whatever it takes to change their minds. So they do so legally!
Use real weapons.
They should be able to use lethal means.
Non-lethal, yes.
Of course.
Not at all
For sure
yes.
Ya why not
You can also add your opinion below!