How would the world be different if the other gender did not exist? Do you think it would be better or worse?

[Anonymous]

[MrOracle]

It would be the end of the species, the only difference would be how long until extinction.

Most women wouldn't survive more than a month without men. The power grid would fail in no more than 3 days, and likely less. Managing grid power is a manual job that depends on having thousands of experienced, knowledgeable workers working together in concert, and less than 2% are women today - vastly fewer than are necessary to keep the power running in the best of times. And when things fail, the damage is extensive and requires expert knowledge to repair and restart, which means it wouldn't happen.

Without electricity, pretty much all other technology ends overnight. You can't refine fuels. You can't refrigerate anything. You can't communicate. No trucks delivering anything. No ships crossing oceans to bring supplies. Grocery stores would be empty in less than a week, and no more products will ever come. No food, no medicine, nothing.

For the men, they would be lonely and sexually frustrated, but otherwise life would continue for most until they died naturally, except maybe for the last million or so spread across the globe - old men who can no longer farm or hunt for food.

[MrOracle]

If you want some idea of how things would go, this show does an excellent job of showing what would happen. Sure, the setting would be a bit different, but the situation would play out more-or-less the same.

www.youtube.com/watch

[sawno]

If its a unisex kinda thing where we all have dicks and vagina's I think it would mostly be the same to be honest. Some people express more feminine others more masculine and everything will just fall into its place.

If its a all girls have been abducted by aliens overnight kind of situation that would be a big issue because we only have one generation to invent cloning or actual DNA gender transitions and I don't know if we'd be able to do that. Thankfully men are the ones who built and maintain a society, so I think on that front we'd be capable of maintaining it its not gonna be as big of a disaster as the other way round. But I think without girls helping reduce stress and motivating us to do the right thing it may become a shitshow on the mental level. Its entirely possible society goes doom mode where the majority of them just enjoys their hobbies for as long as it lasts when the main driving factor of being a responsible adult is out of the window.

[Agape93]

Well most wars, rapes, slavery, prostitution, murder etc. would disappear, and we would go extinct within decades. So, I see no bad results here.

[melssvdv]

I don't know girl. If there were no men then we women would destroy each other instead... God forbids women in power. Just like God forbids children running the household.

[Agape93]

@melssvdv I doubt it, and also I don't give a flying fuck what your sexist god says.

[Unycorn]

No more lovesick ia better.

Party!

But very boring. That's bad.

Everything is fine.

[Lliam]

That would be horrible! No beautiful, sexy, charming women to brighten our lives?
I love the sexual dimorphism of our species. Would guys pair up and would only gay guys be able to enjoy sex? As far as I'm concerned, there would be nothing to live for.

Aside from their physical appearance, women bring beauty to the world with things like dance, music, art, fashion and a woman's touch in decorating a home to make it cute and livable. Women are creative, industrious and hard working.

Women contribute vital emotional intelligence, nurturing, tenderness, empathy, creativity and unique perspectives. Women are good at networking. And they are perfectly capable of innovation, discovery, science, and invention.

I wouldn't want a world populated only by women or men. Men and women complement each other. And, of course, without men and women, our species would become extinct.

[melssvdv]

You are romanticizing women. I know you are twisting words to make us feel good. For example 'hard working' but generally men are more hardworking because they are biologically superior (strength, intelligence, leadership, etc.). But thanks anyway.

[Lliam]

@melssvdv. Some women work incredibly hard. My wife, for instance never stops.
Aside from things that require brute strength, women can do anything men can do. They are as intelligent and history proves that they can be equally good leaders.
I'm sorry you have such a low opinion of your abilities.

[melssvdv]

"women can do anything men can do"

Then why do men outperform women in pretty much everything when doing reality check especially in any kind of sports? Then why are men capable to beget offspring effortlessly?

[Brady]

If no females there would b less elementary teachers. I don't no about othr kinds of teachers.

Would these girls do the following 2 othr girls?

In Florida 2 eight grade girls held down a 6th grade boy. One pulld his swimmin shorts off n a 3rd recorded it. Girls hav takn advantage of drunk guys n raped them.

An elementary school girl in the school library went undr a table n unzipped a boys pants n give him oral. He tried 2 stop her. He raised his hand n was told unless you're telling on yourself don't tell on anyone else by the teacher I think unless it was the librarian.

If no males there would less police n military. There would b less crime because more males commit crimes.

Bettr or worse? It depends.

[MikeMcMansion]

There would be less nurses too, you’d see doctors going out and grabbing construction workers to help them in surgeries

[melssvdv]

Men can easily replace women jobs because men are more powerful.

[ManOnFire]

If the world only had women I think it would be far worse than one with all men, although I imagine there would be some conquering, or at least trying to conquer, other men's territories.

Jealousy and a need to manipulate others and try to control their emotions would devastate a world full of only women.

[Asker]

I'm not debating that both would ruin each other, but men HATE other men with power. They all want it for themselves and to rule..."a little conquering" is an understatement. The amount of war from local tribes to whole entire countries v countries is almost completely the sole architecture of men alone---and you give them weapons and enough time---it is delusional to think there would be any stability in a men only world (and we haven't even touched upon the no more hetero sex thing screwing them up).

Again, like I said, women, would fair no better over time for other reasons as well.

[ManOnFire]

But none of this means women don't hate when other women have power either. Men are stronger and more aggressive so that is why we've seen men do all the conquering, but in a world full of women it will likely be the same, but probably with different means.

[melssvdv]

Men do not hate other men like women would hate other women. And the reason why men are in wars is because men are more capable than us. And also because men are in higher positions of power than us. So they have access to more fields (in this case war). A nation would not choose women to fight in war because we women would drop dead as flies. We will lose against men we are just not as powerful as they are. It is like saying that adults are oppressors over children. It is not because adults are biologically wired to be oppressors, rather they are in higher positions of power than children and hold children in their place for order.

We women need men to survive mot than opposite. Let alone being born...

[Miristheiss]

How would the species reproduce and not die out?

Men build everything, electricity, internet, fuel, water, grow all the food, maintain all of the infrastructure, repair everything.

The species would die out without women.

Until wr die out society would continue to exist because men maintain society and built it all.

[Asker]

You do realize there are women who work construction, can do electrical, water, certainly grow food, and maintain the infrastructure. Like every man on the planet seems to forget when men were away at war during the 40s, women had to pick up the slack. They were welding and building planes and we've gone to space, hello. This isn't the dark ages.

[MrOracle]

The number of women who actually do these things is super tiny. Yes, women work in construction, but for every woman who actually does demolition or carpentry or drywall or flooring, there are 10 who hold stop signs and do paperwork and deliver parts. The stats may show that 12% of people "in construction" are women, but few of those 12% are actually swinging a hammer. It's not zero, but it's not many.

It's an even tinier percentage who actually work on electrical infrastructure - linemen and generation engineers. Yes, on paper, 1.5% of these workers are women, but they're actually the ones working in HR or doing reports - they aren't the ones repairing downed lines or rebuilding generators.

There are essentially zero women who work in oil fields, or at refineries (except for office work). Female commercial sailors (cargo and fuel transport) are non-existent. Zero women maintain wind turbines, and nearly zero build and maintain solar fields. Nearly zero work in water treatment, and nearly zero work in garbage disposal.

And while, in theory, women could LEARN to do many of these things, they couldn't do it in time to survive. It normally takes 6-10 years to build up the knowledge, skills, and experience to operate an electrical generation plant for grid power, or to operate a refinery - and you need enough trained bodies to go to work and run the plants within 3 days, or they'll go offline and they'll never restart.

In WWII, the young men were sent to war, but the factories and shipyards were ran and managed by older men who had decades of experience and who could train women to do the jobs that they did. Plants lost 60% of their men, yes, but that 40% who were the most skilled and knowledgeable were still there. In this scenario, that wouldn't exist.

[melssvdv]

@Asker We are not as capable as men. We need men more than the other way round.

[Telekinetic-Potato]

If all the men got turned into women, the world would fall into chaos from all the arguing over petty shit. A lot of jobs would be left unattended. Things would be left alone because "it'll be fine, someone's got it"

If all the women turned into men... There would be smog everywhere and it would be peaceful but there would be so little chaos that it would effectively have the same result and everyone would die from being content and not worrying about stuff.

[slatyb]

It would be completely different as we would be reproducing asexually, or we would be self-hermaphrodites. Such species evolve more slowly because they don't produce as much variation as sexually reproducing species. For this reason, all the most complex organisms, both animals and plants, reproduce sexually. Even though geologic time is enormous, there hasn't been enough time for asexually reproducing species to evolve to complexity.

[AviatorTom]

I don't know what "the other gender" is but if only the male or female sex existed, humanity would soon die out since reproduction would be extremely rare. There is only one documented case of immaculate conception in humans, that happened two millennia ago, and its fact is often questioned.

[worldscolide]

If men ceased to exist, literally every modern convenience women enjoy, and the infrastructure women use would start to crumble and eventually be destroyed. Additionally we would go extinct..

If women ceased to exist, nothing would break down but we as a race would die out for the same reason we would die out if men ceased to exist.

[mitch7753]

Well, the human race would die out quickly and also everybody would be homosexual because yeah I’m assuming there would still be a sex drive. But if there were no women, There would be a lot better drivers on the road. And if there were no men, there would be no civilized society because most societies things men built for women. Not being any sort of way women are beautiful, but just historically this is how it has worked

[RayanSterling]

It's gonna have It's pros and cons. But for me as a guy, and I know a lot of girls will dislike it (even though its their only point of strength), but I in need of girls intimately 🙇‍♂️

Our balls just can't help, it needs a relief.

And the only natural relief they can get is the girls' triangle shaped thing 🤦‍♂️

[OneViewpoint]

If one gender or the other didn't exist neither would the other. Humans are a heterosexual species. So there would be no humans without both genders.

[WonderingManII]

The world needs balance of both. I think the world is out of balance now. Women are not being Women, and Men are not being Men. The roles have gotten changed to matter of who's opinion, rather than something everyone agrees on.

[jshm2]

The world would not exist at all if there was only one gender, kiddo. That is not how biology works.

[RavVid]

It would a more peaceful relaxed place without women starting fights all the time.

[melssvdv]

We women are born of men. So how are we going to exist anyway?

[FunkyMonkee]

The entire planet would be green instead of blue because there'd be no one to cut the trees and weeds.

[teehartman55]

Humans wouldn't be part of it. As they say, it takes two!

[Staximus]

If this world was all men there would be nothing left but fire, smoke, and ashes. Women are the reason our idiot species hasn't killed ourselves off yet.

[melssvdv]

Semi-erect now?

[genericname85]

Humans wouldn't exist then, cause then procreation wouldn't be a thing and thus mutations (aka evolution) that lead to humans wouldn't exist.

[ginger_snap]

I doubt the world would service without either gender.

[Dargil]

We would all be extinct in less than 80 years.

[Friendlybro79]

We would die off is how it would be. We need each other.

[MikeMcMansion]

The guys you show are some of the most soy-jacked losers I’ve ever seen.

[CallmeTheKnight]

There wouldn’t be any life if the other gender didn’t exist

[snermcger]

Quieter. I would still be a virgin though because I am not into men's hairy asses. Yech...

[blackeagle007]

Nobody would exist if the other gender didn’t

[beefcakebradybatson]

IMAGINE A WORLD WITHOUT BUXOM BLONDES? NOT THIS OL' BOY !!!

[Anonymous]

Well, for one it'd end after this latest generation.

[Spencer10]

Much worse. I love women.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Women ran the world before men ruined it

[jazzy34]

The human race would cease to exist.

[beenherebefore]

I think it would be terrible.

[LiamJHayden]

We couldn't reproduce so we would not know.

[Mike_Hum]

humans need both genders to procreate.

[SofiaMay18]

We both need each other.

[shortster]

We would go extinct

[MasterKS]

No sex, No world.