How should we read Balzac’s harsh critique of newspapers today?

The press, once a calling, has become a mere instrument of parties; from an instrument, it has degenerated into a trade—and like all trades, it is without faith or law. Every newspaper is, as Blondet observes, a shop in which words are sold to the public in whatever hue it desires. Were there a journal for the hunchbacked, it would prove morning and evening the beauty, the virtue, and the necessity of hunchbacks. A newspaper is no longer made to enlighten, but to flatter opinion. Thus, in time, all journals will become cowardly, hypocritical, infamous, deceitful, murderous; they will kill ideas, systems, and men—and by that very means, they will prosper.


They will enjoy the peculiar privilege of all rational beings: evil will be done, yet no one will be held accountable. I shall be Vignon, you will be Lousteau, you Blondet, you Finot—Aristides, Platos, Catos, men of Plutarch; we shall all remain innocent, able to wash our hands of every infamy. Napoleon gave the reason for this moral—or immoral—phenomenon, as you prefer, in a sublime remark drawn from his reflections on the Convention: Collective crimes implicate no one. The press may indulge in the most atrocious conduct, and yet no individual will feel personally stained

Text written in 1837
How should we read Balzac’s harsh critique of newspapers today?
How should we read Balzac’s harsh critique of newspapers today?
Post Opinion