Should we aim for a world without nations or national borders?

[Anonymous]

Obviously this would be very difficult to achieve, but should we try to work toward this goal?

Yes, an ideal world is a world without nations.

No, that is dumb.

[strateguy632]

The point of a border is the LIMIT of authority. Therefore laws in each country are only until the border. For example north Korea wants its rules! it doesn't want rules of south Korea! so it needs border and DMZ. Muslim countries don't want laws that protect liberty=sin, so need border to limit reach of laws.

[DryGermanGuy]

Doesn't seem practical. A Europe without borders is difficult enough.

[exitseven]

No, I like the US the way it is.

[Jeff51]

We need borders to keep bs people out.

[Anonymous]

Nope