
I strongly agree with that sentiment
Possibly a portion of accuracy, but oversimplified in my opinion
I strongly disagree with that assessment, and find it somewhat offensive
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age

Not necessarily in total, but there is a skool of thought that suggests the more people that live in a given community, the faster and more severely the community declines. Specific numbers have been suggested for maximums and ideal, and there is a great deal of research proving certain correlations. There are benefits and detriments to more people in totality, but there absolutely has to be an upper limit to the benefits. There is only so much livable land, and even though there is no legitimate shortage of any meaningful resources, almost every developed nation on Earth has permitted a tiny wealthy, powerful and ultimately greedy minority to control those resources for profit and yet more power.
Well a world without humans would be much better for environment.
But as a world we carry on existing in, it's oversimplified but yes at least the idea goal of the future I see.
Which is less humans needed for mundane jobs as tech has replaced such jobs, most humans are slaves some more content than others to be so.
This not content to be so lot causes a lot of problems in society thus would disappear if that wasn't a need.
In a world not of need for humans to do such jobs you can't and won't want more people you'd be better with less cause now you have a problem with what do all those people now do?
I have zero expectations therefore I'm not really disappointed.
Ever noticed the nicer places have lower populations?
Opinion
11Opinion
Much of our existing technology level would be impossible to maintain if global population levels were lower. It costs hundreds of millions of dollars to launch space satellites for phones and weather forecasting, etc. Insurance sales would be imossible in high risk areas, because without a higher population in low risk areas there would be no way for insurance to cover those high risk areas.
There are all sorts of problems with the "lower the world population" agenda. Who gets to decide who gets to reproduce?
If we're going to lower world population, we should only allow people with IQ greater than 100 to reproduce.
"The less STUPID people there are, the better off the world is". The planet is already a bit stressed out because of how the world is run. IF governments are willing to spend money on the right things, Earth could hand more folks. If they're not willing, zero population growth and more education will do just fine.
Good question.
But who decides who is stupid? Finding someone stupid is subjectively measured, not objectively.
Sorry but that's incorrect. I believe you're confusing stupidity with ignorance. i should have replied that less stupid AND less ignorant people in the world, it would be better off.
Stupidity is indeed measurable and is based on cognitive performance under controlled conditions. Ignorance is a different animal. You can choose to be ignorant, or you can choose to learn IF you're not stupid. If you're stupid, you don't really have a choice. Why? Stupid people don't know they're stupid.
Not incorrect.
Well, not getting into with you. Science has been at this for years and cognitive biases as well as frontal lobe development play a role in their findings. You're actually proving my point; you're not stupid but you lack certain information (or you're ignorant of certain information) that will greatly effect your opinion, which you insist is correct not having that information. Ok, we've been here before.
The great Will Rogers said: "Everyone is ignorant, only on different subjects". You don't seem to believe that.
@Cidknee Once again, as usual, you project your own bias and insecurity onto others. sounds like you're suggesting that I said stupid people should be killed, and so should the ignorant. Hmmm... I never said anything of the kind. I said the world would be better off without stupidity and ignorance. That's all I said, but here you are again. LOL
I didn't elaborate on my point, but here it is: stupidity is often not your fault if you're born with limited mental capacities. Ignorance on the other hand, is completely your own fault. So, chew on that for a while.
@Cidknee @loveslongnails alright, both of you bozos are saying nothing. Enough already lol
I said my statement, you disagree, fine. It was done, but of course, we have to hear some form of judgment from the one tells everyone not to judge. I actually partially agree with you this time lol.
Nope, a society needs to keep growing. If the birthrate takes a sharp decline for too long, there will be a lot of positions going unfulfilled.
Mass illegal immigration just suppresses the symptom and does not address the birth rate which is the root cause.
There are definitely people that we would be better off without. Take the women on The View for example.
I disagree entirely, and the reason being that it's along the same premise as our discussion on public promises.
While i may not be correct on whether or not it would be better for the "lucky winners" who get to live being better off i am correct in that its a disgusting idea for anyone to entertain.
Possibly. I mean just look at the effects of open boarders on countries and how crime rises, and living standards drop.
I'd feel better if people used better grammar !!!
Where is the grammar mistake?
No response?
Even though my pic here is the Statue of Liberty, I still approve your statement.
A Miserable cunt said that. Thank God she is as powerless as she is stupid.
Sounds like a Thanos quote lol
Sounds like something a toddler would say.
Says the guy who calls people who don't share his views "retards." Lol 😂
You are a man child lmao
That's just because you're stupid
Yes. Highly intelligent people whine and complain because they can see what's wrong with our world. Stupid people, on the other hand are oblivious to the reality of the world they live in. They see nothing wrong it. They are content totally unaware of the shit show happening directly under their nose. ☝️
Lol, did you come from central casting? "hey I need an angsty satanist who is really a big fucking nerd but he tries to make himself feel better for his loser life by claiming he's smarter than everyone?"
"how old should this character be? 15? 17? Lives at home and hates the oppression of mom's mini van?
"nah, get this, he should be a millennial in his 30s!"
Please, for the love of G0d, lead the way!
You can also add your opinion below!