Is white flight and re-gentrification responsible for the impoverishment of black communities?

“White flight” has a strong negative connotation in polite society. It is used to tar the motives of mainstream America. Americans returning from service in WWII chose to live in the suburbs rather than urban life.

White flight continued throughout the ‘50s and ‘60s. It was driven by knowing that city neighborhoods that had become inhabitable were falling into further into disarray. That included the influx of blacks that had moved there.

It is in discernible form in Democrat run cities like Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, Newark, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Baltimore and Memphis, among others. More recently, some white, affluent residents have moved back into central-city neighborhoods such as Dorchester, Mass.

This is sometimes called Gentrification and is described as a reversal of white flight; something that many had wished would happen. This movement now has a negative image, a classic example of "white guilt".

The reinvestment in and reinvigoration of city neighborhoods brought accusations that longtime black residents were being displaced. This is a mythology that has emerged and blames white flight for the impoverishment of black communities.

Academia has strained to attribute this to government policy, dealing with housing finance, highways, schools, zoning, and taxation to create wealthy white suburbs at the expense of black neighborhoods. These strained attempts to deflect from the inherent failures within Democrat and black leadership have existed for over a half century.

White flight was a major force in 20th-century American urban history, but mythology that paints it as a bad thing is false. Black leadership should embrace gentrification for its own people.

Is white flight and re-gentrification responsible for the impoverishment of black communities?
Post Opinion