Should international disputes be settled through the Olympic games?

[Chazmatazz269]

This is a thought that i had decades ago; ironically when i portrayed myself as ultra conservative. Ell oh ell!
Put an end to wars. Disputes are settled through sporting events. It sprung into my imagination upon learning that the earliest games were essentially war games. I thought it curious that nations would invite other nations to see the best that they had to offer. The games would sometimes have an effect on allegiances and wartime strategies, but did they mitigate war at all? Maybe. But i’m talking full embargo on war. Everyone participates in the games and everything is decided therein. Might makes right with a negligible death toll.
Would you support settling international disputes with the Olympic games? If so, should it be considered for domestic disputes between states and territories or even political parties? Whenever a compromise cannot be reached through debate, arm wrestle for it! I’m only seeing the upside. What would be the downside?

[exitseven]

I would rather see the leaders of the countries compete in the games.

[Kelly6]

@chazmatazz269 Soon games will be rigged 😆

[andreasderjuengere]

The Olympic games are global --- Not good.

[Cidknee]

That'd be nice.

[Cidknee]

How about the two systems that seem to be the most popular divide this country in two. Then leave the other the fuck alone.

[Chazmatazz269]

Honestly, that would be nice, but i think the reason is obvious. One half needs the other half to pay for both halves. It’s not like the modern democrats are known for their overall contributions. They’re takers. If they didn’t have the working class and rich, who are they going to tax? Ell oh ell!