Questions: Society & Politics

Not attacking either political side when it comes to this idea. This is an open ended non-partisan question.

Anyway I would absolutely love to see JD Vance debate Kamala Harris and Tim Walz debate Donald Trump.

This would be a very badly needed and informative vantage point for American voters to better analyze VPs/presidential candidates. Reason being it would be much more challenging for all the candidates to prepare for their opponents which is a good thing. It would force candidates to think fast on the spot. Get the truth out.

The VP would likely be the aggressor given they can criticize the presidential candidate given they are the ultimate decision makers when it comes to policy. Also the VP would have to defend their own running mates with the opposing presidential candidate’s criticism. It would be like a hostile & unpredictable interview but not necessarily a fist fight.

It would also give more attention and prominence to the VP’s role, abilities and personality. The VP is after all just one gun shot, heart attack, etc. from being the president of the United States.

If both sides could agree to two debates (and maybe do a coin toss on which match up goes first) it be so much better for the American voter. Because it would expose more strengths and weakness of all the candidates. Give a much better picture of what the American voter is really buying.

Anyway I posted this as a non-partisan question. Please avoid attacking Trump, Kamala, etc right off the bat. However I would love to see this and I imagine so would most other people.

I think if this strike lasts more than two weeks , Trump is President #47 .

The US is producing record amounts of fossil fuels right now, but he's going to open up more federal lands to drilling and fracking, and he says that'll cut engery prices by 50% within a year.

"MSNBC's Nicole Wallace claims women object to JD Vance 'mansplaining' immigration during debate after female moderator offered false fact-check" - thepostmillennial.com/msnbcs-nicole-wallace-claims-women-object-to-jd-vance-mansplaining-immigration-during-debate-after-female-moderator-offered-false-fact-check

"As POLITICO Magazine has noted before, Vance is the first White House wannabe to wear facial hair in 80 years. Our appearance is fundamental to our body language, and research indicates that voters see beards as (surprise, surprise) more masculine," Navarro wrote. "That can be positive to some, reading as strength and competence. But to others, especially women, it can be negative, conveying aggression and opposition to feminist ideals." - Politico: Vance's beard a sign of 'aggression' to women, Walz's 'saucer' eyes showed his 'passion' www.msn.com/.../ar-AA1rC3A8?ocid=sapphireappshare

Felony murder is essentially where anyone involved in a felony that results in the death of a person can be charged with murder. The classic example is that if there's a bank robbery where one robber murders a bank teller the getaway driver can also be charged with murder.

In Minnesota they've recently changed the statute in a manner which will allow potentially hundreds of convicted murderers to be set free. Do you think this is just or unjust?