Should AI Instagram and OF models be required by law to prominently disclose the content is AI?

[KrakenAttackin]

AI has already started to eat into the Instagram and Only Fans models revenue. The ladies are getting pissed and are pushing for prominent display that the content is AI (like warning labels 😂😂😂).

YES, sexually charged content should be REQUIRED BY LAW to prominently disclose the AI status.

NO, sexually charged content should NOT be required by law to prominently disclose the AI status.

Results.

Updates

1 y

Personally, with all the filters and makeup, the difference between AI and a real female is already minimal. O don't see a need to disclose anything.

Updates

1 y

Labeling or not, I think eventually the consumers won't care.

[hahahmm]

To all the hookers & wannabe hookers out there: AI will be able to create fake characters who look as good/better than any woman and cannot be detected. The genie is out of the bottle. It doesn't matter what laws are passed. The average OF model only makes $125/month anyhow. It's like a bunch of fast food cashiers complaining that they might get replaced by robots. Okay, and? The fact you don't have other skills is not my problem.

[KrakenAttackin]

@hahahmm. That's exactly right. If you don't have a skill set of some kind you had better get one. This will be a very rude wakeup to a lot of women.

[DextroShade]

Subway will be hiring

[KrakenAttackin]

@DextroShade Starbucks and Target can always use a few busty wokeys.

[hahahmm]

@DextroShade @KrakenAttackin They will destroy those businesses with false claims of sexual harassment. These women see some other women making millions off claims & they will try the same con game.

[DextroShade]

Well they could always just suck dick for money

[KrakenAttackin]

@DextroShade They are doing that already online.

[DextroShade]

Yeah well they will have to do it in person just all previous generations of whores did.

[DextroShade]

No, let them compete against the bots on a level playing field where the simps can't tell the difference. If these whores are really offering something unique and special then they don't need to worry about AI.

Generative AI putting OF thots out of work would be a very good thing for society.

[kylee2437]

The biggest way to stop this is by stop idolizing them all together. Men are some of the biggest culprits of following these accounts and wondering why they still exist.

[KrakenAttackin]

@kylee2437. True but men simping for women will never change.

[dustybiker2]

They angry are thinking about it all wrong. Maybe they should take some digital art classes. When looks fail they can keep producing content in ai themselves.. 😬

[KrakenAttackin]

@dustybiker2. This is exactly the correct attitude.

[dustybiker2]

Adaptability. I'm starting to say this a lot, but it's the way to survive. Best way to live.

[Anonymous]

when AI was taking away men's jobs in factories, feminists told them to shut up and stop whining

now with AI taking away women's jobs on OnlyFans, feminists wanna cry foul play lol

[WhiteBoyChill]

Talk about being self centered is right

[KrakenAttackin]

Anon... that's exactly right. Now, have big rack and iphone won't command the pay it used to.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Honestly, AI should be more regulated in general. Especially considering how AI can never make anything original, it only copies and spits out what amalgams it can but it still profits from it, especially when it learns from other people’s work without their consent.

[meepmeeperton]

They should kick OF "creators" off the platform altogether. Instagram has so much softcore porn at this point it's ridiculous.

[IslaTheWitch]

it should be disclosed... because no AI is trained completely... so it "can make mistakes"

[CrabCakes11]

All AI should be disclosed. Calling a woman wearing makeup and AI the same is mental though

[KrakenAttackin]

@crabcakes11. I disagree. Women are so filtered, photoshopped, and with layers of makeup; that both the "real" person and AI are imaginary.

[CrabCakes11]

I agree with the filters and photoshop l, but makeup? You can’t tell what somebody looks like under makeup? You can’t be serious. I understand if you have a vision impairment, but use your brain

[KrakenAttackin]

@crabcakes11. Do a search on YouTube for before/after makeup. It's amazing when bridge trolls all of a sudden look like models.

[CrabCakes11]

I’ve seen them. You can still tell they look like that if you have an ounce of intelligence

[KrakenAttackin]

@crabcakes11. Whatever, AI is evolving rapidly and just being "hot" won't be enough to take in millions. Eventually (3-4 years) the "hot girls will have to get real jobs or land and keep wealthy husbands.

[CrabCakes11]

You do realize the vast majority of sex workers aren’t millionaires, right?

[KrakenAttackin]

@crabcakes11. I do and even fewer will be soon.

[CrabCakes11]

Wanking it to AI is more pathetic than subscribing to only fans

[DextroShade]

I'd say it is even.

[WhiteBoyChill]

I mean, I’m all for anything that gets women away from OF

[DrPepper12]

can't let the bots win no matter how high quality. Human content creators only.

[KrakenAttackin]

@DrPepper12. That's a dinosaur approach. AI is developing so fast and will naturally enter markets that were exclusively human. This change is inevitable.

[DrPepper12]

True. I fant tell deep fakes from real anymore and the students have Chat GPT wrote their essays now.

[LaurenM1997]

omg not just here then 🤦‍♀️

[LaurenM1997]

Bots eveywhere

[KrakenAttackin]

Yup, AI boys are coming for "content creators". The days of having zero skills but being "hot", and making millions are numbered.

[LaurenM1997]

That’s nonsense 🤦‍♀️ ugh I hate it

[strateguy632]

1st.

[Drewtate]

Yes absolute