Should AI Be Banned to Protect Our Privacy?

[Nyctoveilexe]

Nowadays, AI is being used to create non-consensual and inappropriate content of women and children. An influencer even dealt with this recently; someone opened a fake Deepfake OnlyFans account in her name. It’s absolutely disgusting. Do you think AI should be banned?

[FreyaRed]

No.
If someones posts AI generated pedophilia content, the person gets to jail. It doesn't matter it's not real.
I don't care for all those OF "Stars and Starlets", they scam simps other simps scam them with AI generated content. Those girls should sue the site who post AI generate pictures with them. It's finally the reason we have courts and police. They are adults, make adult content and should be able to act like adults while suing people who exploit them.

It's like with cars, they kill people but benefits of personal transportation are higher than damages causes by cars. AI has to prove itself if it's beneficial for society or damaging. Banning it before it started isn't a smart move. Maybe is AI the tool to cure cancer and improve efficiency in our societies? When we ban it now we will never know.

[Chloe_Jones]

AI has its place and can be used for many good purposes but I definitely agree that any use of AI to cause harm etc should definitely be banned. But tech companies are so big and there are no doubt many ways to beat the system harmful AI is going to sadly become more common and harder to remove

[DonaldDarko]

Communists are starting to use it to attack X. Other platforms could be attacked as well. In the end the result could be that actual degenerates could photograph themselves comfiting the most heinous acts and distribute the photos among their friends freely. They'll just say it's AI.

[Chazmatazz269]

Since you made it clear that you only care about specific victims and you have no intention of protecting male victims, no.
No law should ever be applied to only one demographic. Any legislation that does is not just unethical, but unconstitutional.

[DrPepper12]

No. Ridiculous to presume we can control our creations (Hell we create gods by the thousands!) Frankenstein is a prescient warning.

We should do like the Dutch: You own your likeness & copyright AT BIRTH with SEVERE penalties for violations.

Then again they're a sane society..

[Twalli]

AI has done far more good than harm. Nothing will be perfect. Should we ban dihydrogen monoxide, it's the largest component of acid rain and causes more deaths than any other single cause in the world. If you think we should, you just wanted us to ban water.

[jshm2]

Lol, don't be silly. Photoshop still exists, as do many other editing apps.

So banning isn't going to do shit, other than pushing it underground.

Better to have it up here, where something can be done.

[David318578]

Think all AI content should be labeled as AI in the video. Fake AI YouTube videos that are posted as real should be illegal. Right now its still not to hard to spot them. But its getting harder and harder

[Adam_INTJ]

Regulated, sure. Banning just destroys innovation.

The knee-jerk reaction to not understanding something should not be an impulse to destroy it. We'd still be traveling in wagons and dying of dysentery if that's how things worked.

[Telekinetic-Potato]

It's too late. Anyone can make a model now there's thousands of amazing ones which have been downloaded probably millions of times by now.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Tech companies could just allow us privacy period, instead of having digital back doors into everything we do

[Hagar88]

AI uses more fresh water as the entire global water bottling industry does. Worth thinking about

[sawno]

Recognition AI and data collection? Absolutely I am in favor of that. Generative AI can be done in a privacy friendly way.

[sawno]

Banning image editing AI will do nothing by the way, AI enthusiasts already can run these at home.
Just make spreading such images illegal and that will make people not want to do that.

[sage2021]

Yes! I don't like AI at all!

We all lived fine before AI didn't we?

[CaptainObivous]

Shouldn't be banned, but should be regulated, AI can be very useful in science and medicine.

[UrLoveMocha]

I don’t think it should be banned but monitored for illegal activity.

[jamesgoldman]

Absolutely but unfortunately it's been released now

All us with concerns of skynet were hushed before but now the birds are home to roost

[dragoblack]

Autonomous and thinking AI should be banned from buisness. Buisness was AI slaves to replace people who need to work for money, and to use it to sclap info from us.

[ChicoFromThe305]

Yea I at the very least it should be controlled and regulated

[WonderingManII]

We can't ban AI. The genie is out of the bottle.

[TonyMetal___86]

They didn't create A. I to ban it, actually it's going to become dirtier and more realistic, also more controlling!

[Alex-Snow]

It is kind of worrisome if we ever are going to have privacy any more

[In_Trance]

There's no point in trying to protect people's privacy when they willingly post their entire lives online on social media

[888theGreat]

I don't know , but Trump is all for it EVEN though it means job losses for Americans , and Democrats oppose it because they support unions.

[Kelly6]

@Nyctoveilexe it doesn’t need to be banned, it just should be labeled as AI video.

[Staximus]

Artificial intelligence is the devil, and I don't even believe in the devil

[FenixG45]

Its fine to say AI should be banned, but the genie is already out of the bottle! Good Luck putting it back in the bottle!

[jaecifer]

A. I. is one of the scariest reality of our existence.

[AnonLife]

Yet women are the ones who use grok to undress themselves far more than men do

[lilBigPotato]

Not banned but it needs stricter rules.

[captain_voidwalker]

Ai should be banned so we don't end up with skynet

[eagle1951]

yeah