Probably the government and the population are crooked. 🇨🇦 Best off moving North in my opinion. $50 days they don’t want to change.
I tried when the world was against me, could never get the money for an RV or trailer even though I should have been able to easily enough, scammed by my own family and shit.
No aslong as you actually can manage things like garbage, parking, water and electricity in a legal way. It's isn't suitable for family life. Since society isn't nomadic.
Definitely shouldn't be illegal. I dont know the laws, but I feel that as long as the vehicle isn't super intrusive, you should be able to park it anywhere regular vehicles are allowed. I think living in a van would be really fun, nothing to tie you down.. but I'm too much of a hoarder for that.
I am against it! Not for your situation but for the 99% of the others. Your $100K van is out of reach for most! Its the other 99% of crime ridden trash! First is safety issues, Next police want to know where you are, States and cities want their tax, trash and waste not properly disposed of.
It should not be illegal when they own it and live in it with proper documents and in the right place. However, if they intend to park their van anywhere without proper permission or authorization, then it should be illegal.
Looks like cool ass van inside and be nice to hang but maybe not live. I don't it should be illegal some people is all they can afford and be homeless. I be okay a van but I don't think I would want to live in a van. It wouldn't really impress most girls.
Why would it be illegal? As long as it's not hurting anyone, not parked on someone else's place or living unhumane conditions, I don't see a problem with it.
No, the last time i checked t was a free coiuntry. What about all the people living on the sidewalk of democrat run cities Do they get a pass because they are Biden's people?
Some people that are single or couples that has kids but are grown and moved on sellout and travel the world. But sometimes you have those that don't have family, so they do the best they can. We need to concentrate on people that's got all the money and sitting on it.
Many different reasons: 1. There's not really much land around here and even if there is land you need to acquire a permit to have a semi permanent home on it, don't quote me but I think it's anything longer than 4 maybe 6 months. 2. There's nothing in place for postal addresses, even if you're in a place that receives post. Maybe you can have a postcode created for yourself but I can bet you that's a pretty penny. 3. There is real bad stigma about mobile home owners in UK and you can actually not get jobs based on that fact. 4. Because of the overcrowding crisis - that the gov purposely created 🙄 - they give more permission to build up rather than low and across. 5. Yet despite that crisis, government officials say they don't want to introduce tiny living as that'll impact negatively on mental health, and will be forcing people into shittier conditions. (Never mind that people are asking for this). 6. They are already wasting a lot of our police time by shooing away vans and caravans/motorhomes, away from roadsides allowing more people to own them, would mean even more police resources wasted.
There's probably more that I can't think of, but I've watched a few shows on tiny living in the US and it sounds great 15-30k to own your home a brilliant thing for retirees or graduates so that they can live rent free in the start of their lives or the end of their lives.
Oh thought of one more: 7. The structural value of the property is nothing like houses it won't gain money in time, rather the structural integrity will dramatically decrease over time and would need replacing a lot more than brick and mortar. Therefore they don't want to invest in projects like tiny living, as there's no money to be made aka- inheritance tax or if at the end of your life you have no family/friends etc then the government gets the full estate value, which is next to nothing if it's a mobile home.
Nah. Especially if your a traveller or are homeless. I've always had a love for vans (especially old ones) so if someone wants to live in a van down by the river fine by me lol
I have only encountered gypsies/travelers a few times. As long as people leave me alone, I leave them alone. It’s that whole concept of Live and Let Live.
I think raising children in a van should be illegal. There’s the family on tiktok.. really weird people. It’s like 11 of them living on a bus.. with children.
Nope. If someone wants to live in their van there is nothing wrong with it.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
Dont be so surprised because of the housing costs. Its only a matter of less affordibility over time, that more people resort to living in vans or tents.
if you are self-contained and in a RV park then it is ok there BLM campgrounds that snowbirds live in over the winter and go back home up north when the weather warms up
I agree with the other user here. Raising kids in a car/van should be illegal. I understand some don’t have another option but definitely people need to start buying RVs
Well, homelessness was not a thing for centuries even though there was a huge financial gap between the poor and rich, it’s due to politics. You know there are countries like in the Norwegian countries who do not even have one homeless person because healthcare is affordable and cheap, rent prices are fixed that whole time you live in that home. However, the US doesn’t care about homelessness, and those who are on drugs should be helped forcibly because I do not think ‘it’s a free country’ is good in this case, more rule and order.
@Bellona So basically your argument is that people should be arrested so that they can get the help they need?
Honestly, that's a fair proposal, if we're talking about alcoholics and drug addicts. But you're leaving out the other homeless people that are NOT affected by substance abuse issues. Why should they be subjected to arrest when they're not doing anything wrong? And if their problems are purely financial, how is the government going to help them (aside from giving them free money)?
@Jamie05rhs those people who have financial problems need to be put in public housing and given a job, as it is hard for the homeless to find a job when the manager does not know if they could trust them to work for them (if they will go back to drugs... a risk). If those are given public housing temporarily until they have a job it would be helpful and the managers of businesses would be more likely to trust them if addicts are given help and put away from society until addict free.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
+1 y
+1 y
00 Reply
