Skip to 2:34 to watch it if you want.
Whose side are you on in the Whoopi Goldberg vs Jeanine Pirro screamfest on the View?
Skip to 2:34 to watch it if you want.
Jeanine Pirro. I mean one, she was pointing out provable facts (also amusing to see people who know nothing of the law arguing about it to an actual judge.), two whoopi Goldberg was not just inappropriate in her behavior and vitriol but she was inaccurate with her statement suggesting that trump claimed Mexicans where rapist (what he said was illegal immigrants are more prone to rape and crime which is statistically accurate (roughly 75% of illegal immigrants have criminal records)). Hell technically she was being racist for presuming that all Mexicans came here illegally. This conceit, irrationality, and just pure seething hatred is what is causing people to disavow the left. Disgusting.
I somewhat agree with some of Whoopi's points. She should have remained calmer though, the girl was bringing her out of her own character. I saw her trying to hold herself together but I think she was just tired of all the bullshit going in this country. The other girl wasn't making much sense and was overall being a bitch. As normal, Trump would have a representative who totally avoids real questions.
You can say "Trump, your shirt is inside out," and he or his representative would say. "But what about your shoes though?" Just fuckery as always. I avoid the view and the news so I don't get triggered lol.
Blah blah blah, Trump is this and that and he's the next Hitler because I have no fucking legit perception of what a new Hitler would look like, blah blah blah.
Americans have gotten so whiny since Trump got elected, I almost want Obama back so they'll be dumb and docile again.
(I AM GROSSLY EXAGGERATING)
@cavmanier I like Sweden and want people to enjoy it here, so I'm an obvious racist, hence the lack of extremist socialism.
@cavmanier Not sure what you mean by that (I was sarcastic by the way)
They're quiet because Obama was slaughtering them for wanting to meet with sheriffs that value the constitution, or putting them in solitary for knowing too much. Or assassinating them if they snitched and ruined his plan to nuke Charleston. Or making it look like an accident if they had dirt on him or Hillary.
The rest were either ignored, too scared to speak up, or willfully ignorant of what the Lord of the Flies was doing.
@HughJass : California already banned straws. Never mind most straws in the ocean are from Indonesia and other shithole countries.
@ObscuredBeyond Banning straws won't stop the California democrats to stop sucking.
I can't be on Whoopi's side because she's on the side of a peadophille who drugged and raped a 13 year old girl.
I don't agree with your viewpoint on this because I kind of see where she was coming from. She wasn't saying the man wasn't wrong or that she's for the rape of a 13-year-old and etc. She was stating that not everyone knows what happened exactly and they are judging without all the facts and in reality despite a 13-year-old being a child. It might not have been "Rape rape" which means it was statutory rape but the girl could have still wanted to participate even though in the laws eyes she doesn't have a choice. And I see that because I remember being in school and hearing literal eight-year-olds talking about fucking our gym teacher. Not all kids are completely clueless and mindless. And yes, the man is a pedophile and it goes against the law but Whoopi was merely speaking on her beliefs that there could be more there in 13-year-old rape victim case. She just worded it weird.
St the end of the day he did break the law and can be charged as a pedophile though. No matter what happened.
@CherryRoseChampange "We did photos with me drinking champagne," Geimer says. "Toward the end it got a little scary, and I realized he had other intentions and I knew I was not where I should be. I just didn't quite know how to get myself out of there." In a 2003 interview, she recalled that she began to feel uncomfortable after he asked her to lie down on a bed, and described how she attempted to resist. "I said, 'No, no. I don't want to go in there. No, I don't want to do this. No!', and then I didn't know what else to do," she stated, adding: "We were alone and I didn't know what else would happen if I made a scene. So I was just scared, and after giving some resistance, I figured well, I guess I'll get to come home after this".
Geimer testified that Polanski provided champagne that they shared as well as part of a quaalude, and despite her protests, he performed oral, vaginal, and anal sex acts upon her, each time after being told 'no' and being asked to stop.
https://youtu.be/sHflBPU-DtA she actively defends and excuses away what he did.
Fact is Polanski got a 13 year old drunk on purpose and drugged during a photo shoot so he could have sex with her. A child can't consent to sex nor can a woman who's been drugged or under the influence of alcohol.
Let's be clear Roman Polanski was convicted and if he ever returns to the United States he will be thrown in jail.
This is why people don't listen to Hollywood because they defend and protect rapists and peadophilles like Polanski.
I am not informed on this issue. Why has this Roman Polanski not been extradited?
@Trollfather there's been attempts to extradite him but he only goes to countries where he won't get extradited. France, Switzerland and Poland have all refused to extradite him.
Horrible. Shows the corruption of those countries. I guess they like having pedophiles in their midst.
He seemed to have the establishment and big film industry behind him in France and Poland but 75% of poles and French do not want him to escape justice for what he did.
@Trollfather it's no different here I dont think. I mean look at how many celebrities still support him even the very anti-trump #METOO celebrities. In 2009 more than 100 celebrities as well as the film actors guild signed a document calling for his release.
Michael A. Russ Erika Abrams, Fatih Akin, Yves Alberty, Stephane Allagnon, Woody Allen, Pedro Almodóvar, Gianni Amelio, Greta Amend, Wes Anderson, Michel Andrieu, Roger Andrieux, Pascale Angelini, Yannick Angelloznicoud Jean-Jacques Annaud, Tomas Arana, Frédéric Aranzueque-Arrieta, Alexandre Arcady, Fanny Ardant, Asia Argento, Marie-Hélène Arnau, Stéphane Arnoux, Darren Aronofsky, Olivier Assayas, Alexander Astruc, Simone Audissou, Gabriel Auer, Zdzicho Augustyniak, Alexandre Babel, Vladimir Bagrianski, Lubomila Bakardi, Fausto Nicolás Balbi, Eleonor Baldwin, Jean-François Balmer, Alberto Barbera (Museo nazionale de Torino), Sylvie Bardet-Borel, Luc Barnier, Christophe Barratier, Ernest Barteldes, Carmen Bartl, Pascal Batigne,
Anne Baudry, Henning Bauer, Tone Bay Juan Antonio Bayona, Xavier Beauvois, Liria Begeja, Matthieu Béguelin, Gilles Behat, Jean-Jacques Beineix, Marco Bellochio, Yannick Bellon, Florence Bellone, Monica Bellucci, Véra Belmont, Jacqueline Belon, Jean-Marc Benguigui, Djamel Bennecib, Saïd Ben-Said Luc Béraud, Jean-Pierre Berckmans, Jacob Berger, Christof Berger, Alain Berliner, Gael Garcia Bernal, Pascal Berney, Xavier Berry, Bernardo Bertolucci, Giuseppe Bertolucci, Jean-Marie Besset, Nico Beyer, Marlène Bisson, Arnstein Bjørkly, Lucien Blacher, Virginie Blanc-Brude Bard, Jean-Marc Bloch, Léa Bloch, Catherine Boissière, Anne-Sylvie Bonaud, Olivier Bonnet, Thierry Boscheron, Renata Bosco, Freddy Bossy, Jacqueline Bouchard, Louise Anne Bouchard Patrick Bouchitey, Cédric Bouchoucha, Paul Boujenah, Patrice Bourbon, Frédéric Bourboulon, Etienne Boussac, Katia Boutin, Elizabeth Brach Ian Brady, Jacques Bral, Sophie Bramly, Paulo Branco, Patrick Braoudé, Guila Braoudé, Edwin Brienen,
Adrien Brody, Isabelle Broué, Max Brun, Merima Bruncevic, Bastien Brunel Anne Burki, André Buytaers, Emilie Buzyn, Anthony Byrne, Marco Cacioppo, Gerald Calderon, Monica Cannizzaro, Peggy Carajopoulou-Vavali, John Carchietta, Christian Carion, Henning Carlsen, Jean-Michel Carré, Esteban Carvajal Alegria, Lionel Cassan, Bryan Cassiday, Miss Catadler, Steve Catieau Mathieu Celary, Teco Celio, Muriel Cerf, Dabiel Chabannes, Thierry Chabert, Chagi, Jean-Yves Chalangeas, Daniel Champagnon, Christophe Champclaux, Georges Chappedelaine , Litseselidis Charalampos Yann Charbonnier, David Charhon, Fabienne Chauveau, Claire Chazal, Patrice Chéreau, Brigitte Chesneau, Marie-Christine Chesneau, Michel Chevalier, Mishka Cheyko, Catherine Chiono, Catherine Chouchan, Elie Chouraqui, Alex Cichy, Souleymane Cissé, Jean- Pierre Clech, Henri Codenie, Robert Cohen, Olivier Cohen, Catherine Colassin, Suzanne Colonna, Jean-Paul Commin, Andrea Concato, Anne Consigny, Alain Cophignon, Antony Cordier,
There's too many I'm only in the c part. Here's a link with a list of Polanski supporters
Figures. Shows the power of the media and the Hollywood brainwashing machine. They say X and all followers believe X because it's all they ever been tuned into their entire lives. Show them Y and they freak out.
@Trollfather I ended up writing a mytake.
Peadophille rapist Roman Polanski. The facts and who in Hollywood supports him. ↗
I'm suprised by the 4 downvotes which indicate that those people support Roman Polanski and think whoopi was right about it not being rape to drug and have sex with a 13 year old girl.
Yes I saw it, I'll read later, I'm at work right now hehe.
I don't take these people seriously. They tend to base their beliefs on out of context information that means something completely different when in context. It's like the difference between murder and self-defense with a weapon. And I believe they are too emotionally invested to want to look okay the information neutrally.
I don't expect people to maintain openness to thought when there's murmuring in the background when even suggesting the president. These people gave up their ability towards critical thought because the groups opinion is defacto enough to where they think there's no reason to think outside of it.
I kind of agree with this, their emotional investments really kill logical thought most times. Completely throws their viewpoints out the window because they can't control themselves.
Look, they invited her and can uninvite her whenever they want. Just like if you invited someone over to your house and they pissed you off, you can tell them to leave.
Also, Pirro asked Whoopi a question and didn't allow Whoopi to respond, instead talking over her. Then when Whoopi tried asking her a question, Pirro dodged around it.
Then again, the View knew what they were doing and getting themselves into. They knew who Pirro was, they used to share the panel with her (I believe I heard that). Whoopi also stated that she apologized for getting upset and how she doesn't do it, yet did it in front of everyone. And she was to quick to react that way.
It was definitely not as one sided as Fox news declared it to be. But it's Fox news, what else would you expect?
Millionaires yelling at one another, honestly.
To put it mildly Whoopi Goldberg is a nasty disgusting ghetto POS. Why they keep that around I haven't a clue. In cause you missed it, notice that as soon as Judge Jeanine makes a valid point, a few actually to the ghetto monster Whoopi, ghetto monster Whoopi tries to shut the Judge down. I am pleased to say I had the pleasure to meeting Judge Jeanine in person and we had a good conversation, however if I every had a chance to meet the ghetto monster Whoopi I would first tell her how disgusting she is and walk off.
I don't know. I don't know if I care. When two or more people lose their heads, I lose my interest in listening to their opinions. I'd rather listen to a civil and rational conversation/discussion and/or debate than to listen to people insult one another and escalate into a physical altercation. I'd still respect both sides, even if they disagreed (and/or I disagreed with them). But when they bring their inner demon child into the circumstances, that's when it becomes difficult to keep the discussion going.
Jeanine Pirro just likes listening to herself talk. She didn’t say anything in that entire interview. She’s supposedly promoting a book, but all she wants to do is scream about how liberals are stupid. I have no respect for her as a person at all.
Whoopi "it wasn't rape rape" wtf
Asker, I can understand her viewpoint better, given that she usually makes one instead of just dropping names.
I'm not American and I don't watch the view with any regularity.
@catholicgirl22 please miss me with your false shock/concern trolling. I haven't the patience for that kind of reductionist conservative tactic today.
Justin Trudea still groping women?
You bring a TV Court judge on a morning television show. The judge who is a spokesperson who basically backtracked on meetings. Someone who is "LOOKING FOR HILARY CLINTON". With all the resources you have, with all the "eyes and ears: to find this woman, and you can't, you also have an Attorney General who is more powerful than her, and calls for, and still nothing is done.
Trump has opened the door for white suprimicist to do their thing without fear. 3 black wondn have been murdered by white suprimicist in this past week...
Here’s what Anne Hathaway has to say about WHITE PRIVILEGE
The guy was homeless and required medication which he wasn't on. He was having a mental breakdown. Hate crime is just what people are labeling it as because he is white and she was black.
@truthbeknown umm no. He killed another black girl as well and it was definitely a hate crime. Another black woman sad murdered after a white supremicist befriended her for the sole purpose of murdering her.
And how has Trump enabled this guy?
@truthbeknown cause trump opened the door with his racism for all his little racist followers to do their thing.
I'm Canadian, I really don't give a shit. All I see is a bunch of people crying and screaming in the corner of a room without any details or specific events as to what is being racists. If you want to end racism, you need to tell people specifically what is holding you back or holding your down in life or no one can help you. Right now, all you're doing is being another sidewalk protester screaming about nothing for the sakes of causing a public disturbance. If all you have is one insane white guy who murdered some women, I don't see how that is holding you back in life or how Trump specifically made it happen. Sorry, try again to change my mind.
@truthbeknown I’m sorry was I talking to you? Like you’re said you are Canadian do you’re on the outside looking in. When you try to address the issues that are going on people just over look it.
I didn't pay attention to it, yet it found it's way to my ears. Personally I don't really care. Whoopi Goldberg used to be cool. Now she's not. I don't really know or care for Judge, but she also doesn't deserve the treatment Whoopi dealt her. So by proxy I'd say Whoopi is wrong, but I wouldn't argue I'm on Jeanine's side. Just that Whoopi should handle herself better.
It sounds like whoopi's "view" not anyone else's. Throwing a tantrum is not a political discussion and it makes me laugh when people do so. A discussion is two sided and if you have someone on your show, it's okay to ask questions and question that person's view. But don't flail your arms and almost start throwing shit because you don't agree.
The irony is... if blacks and latinos and democrats ACTUALLY believed Trump was half as bad as they claim... they would all be silent out of sheer terror, afraid of Trump supporters coming along to skin them alive and hang their corpses on a bridge.
Woopi Goldberg is a comedienne, and... who is Jeanine Pirro? So, yeah. I don't care.
by the way, she's been "in the crime business", not "crime-fighting business". LOL
That being said, Donald Trump is a horrible person, and as far as presidents go, he sucks the most (that's not to say that any of the previous presidents didn't; they all did in their own special and unique ways).
Sky screamer identified
@ObscuredBeyond What's a sky screamer?
Are you calling me a sky screamer?
You hurt MUH FEELINGS!!!
I'm not on anyone's side.. Pirro is a vile human being, she's nasty and arrogant and a conspiracy theorist. Whoopi is not as smart as people think she is, but she's alright. I this case tho, for me, she lost the argument when she went off on her and took the argument in a completely different direction.
@cinderelli- I think judge Jeanine is one of the most fair and balanced conservatives currently on tv. Being a former judge she always deals with only the facts- not innuendo as you imply with your inaccurate assessment of her being a conspiracy theorist. You can of course feel repulsed by her ideology, but it's unfair to label her the way you did- especially without providing evidence.
@Girther10 like I said, I'm not on Whoopi's side, but saying that ''judge Jeanine is one of the most fair and balanced conservatives'' only makes conservatives look bad in my opinion. She's not fair, she's the prime example of someone who just shouts and shouts because she believes if you say something again and again, enough people will believe it. (which does work for Trump base but not others)
I’m not taking a side however I didn’t like the snug bitch face that Jeanine was giving. But whatever... I don’t watch shit like this on TV because it’s trash anyway.
I haven't watched it but it's safe to say I'm on Pirro's side.
If you haven't watched in then your opinion is irrelevant lol
@Allie_Oops and I care what you think because why?
I haven't ever politically agreed with whoopi goldberg
It's not what I think. It's fact. Someone who just blindly agrees with a person without having heard either argument is someone with an irrelevant opinion lol.
You're almost 40. I'd think you'd know that it's ignorant to follow someone blindly like that.
@Allie_Oops 1st of all I said its safe to say... meaning most likely. That's not concrete following.
Secondly I love when people bring my age into it. That's the weakest argument ever.
Lastly, I wasted 4 minutes of my life watching it just for you sweetie and my assumptions were correct. Goldberg came across as a hysterical loon.
@HughJass yes. It really is aptly named because it's like they all share 1 brain. One view is all they have.
Lol, you watched the video just for me? Interesting considering how I never asked you to watch it hahahahaha
@Allie_Oops oooo I'm weird? Oh that's the meanest thing ever 😏
I think whooping proved pirouette was correct when pirouette said whoopi has trump derangement syndrome- she went into an out of control rant like a lunatic- proving judge Jeanine was right- TDS big time!
I vote put rubber dicks in both of their mouths to shut them the fuck up.
Im on Jeanine pirros side. Whoopi showed a bigoted side with that display. I actually signed a petition to have ABC fire whoopi from the view because of it.
I don't really care, but I'm more inclined to believe what Whoopi said. (Pirro being a diva and yelling at staff)
Whoopi Goldberg was fun in movies so she gets my vote but I am saying that while ignoring child rape wasn't real rape... can't it.. nope... can't see it
Yep, need to a MyTake on right-wing racist/sexist morons
LMAO World class projection there.
How many left-wing rallies had cowardly losers ganging up on a female/minority?
How many of the MASSIVE amount of mass shootings were committed by a liberal?
I could go on and on with questions like those.
by the way Just because a SCARY black person walks with 2 city blocks of you doesn't mean they're threatening violence towards you.
I advise you follow lnghrn_fan88's example and block me lol
I noticed you chose NOT to answer those questions... I definitely understand why you'd not want to.
You DO know the difference between facts and the Fox news propaganda you're spewing is right?
Or are you actually so stupid that you HONESTLY believe the mass shooting by RIGHT-WING losers were just faked like your guy Alex Jones believes?
Still didn't answer ANY of the questions. :) Go on, prove me wrong.
why bother? you're just gonna spout as many leftist talking point as you want and then claim victory. i could link you to the things i just told you myself but you'd just tell me my sources are too biased or something. this will go nowhere and you know it will.
like i say though the fact that Trumps approval rating keeps going up and not down and that blue wave you democrats were hoping for will be little more than a trickle should probably worry you.
Aw come on slugger!!! You can answer just one!!! We all believe in you!!!
Tell the GaG world about the liberal mass shooters!!!
Regale us with tales of men assaulting women and/or minorities at liberal rallies!!
I'm ABSOLUTELY sure that the right-wing "men" who blocked me because they needed a safe place would LOVE to see you prove me wrong!!
Do it Tiger!!!
I know. And we all know exactly why you won't.
Perfect response!!! Referring to telling the truth as "playing my game".
I almost feel bad for you and don't really think I even need to do much more than let you respond to prove my point.
This is kinda like sandblasting a saltine lol
Most Helpful Opinions
The show itself is stupid. Pirro wasn't on for 30 seconds before they started in on her. At 14 seconds they were already attacking. "I thought she was talking about the Trump White House."
At 1:32 they try to switch the topic to Pirro's belief of Trump. Pirro states she is there to talk about her book.
Whoopi chimes in at 1:55 and states "No, you gotta answer the question."
Pirro brings up the official metrics that Presidential Administrations are measured on.
Whoopi begins asking a question at 2:34, the blond on the left interrupted at 2:36 and Pirro lets her know that she is listening to Whoopi at 2:37. Whoopi then goes off because Pirro directed the blondes attention to Whoopi.
Then Whoopi starts in with Trump Derrangment, which was never mentioned. Whoopi is on record (on The View) stating she was going to move if Trump was elected.
Whoopi starts on a rant, that has nothing to do with the book, from 2:37 to 2:35. Then asks a question.
Pirro addresses the question by stating "I want to answer your question." (2:35)
Whoopi says at 2:38, "I didn't ask a question." You have to listen carefully.
Pirro redirects to Whoopi's opening statement about Trump. Whoopi then denies the statement and states Pirro said Trump was horrible. Which Pirro did not do. Pirro only gave official metrics, around 1:55.
Whoopi then continues to shout over Pirro.
Whoopi then makes a statement about Trump stirring people up to beat up other people. I would like to see where Whoopi got that information.
Whoopi then kicks Pirro off the show at 4:00.
My question is, why would you invite a person on the show to talk about their book. Then not talk about the book or the reason it was written. Only flame them over topics not related to the book. Makes no sense.
Pirro tried to address the questions posed, but the "hosts" did not want to listen. They just wanted to make their own opinions heard.
I would be just as annoyed as Pirro if that happened to me.
Because the view has some crazy ass bitches on it. All they want to do is sit there and bitch and name call.
@Rissyanne Very true. I never watched the show. I really don't need to. Their idiocy makes the news rounds enough for me to know it's not worth watching.
What is more funny is some liberal idiot on here calls Pirro a bimbo. She is a highly educated woman. A beautiful woman. I dont know many men who would choose a nasty woman like Goldberg over a highly educated beautiful woman like Pirro.
@Rissyanne I'm waiting for Goldberg to carry out her promise of moving if Trump got elected. It's been a year now. Time to go. Maybe she needs help finding a U-Haul store.
Ghetto monster Whoopi invited Judge Jeanine on that clown show for one reason and one reason only. Ghetto queen wanted to use that opportunity to make a grandstand against Judge Jeanine and Trump.