What’s so bad about being a gold digger? (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
133Opinion
The main problem here is that she can take his money with her after she ends the relationship, but he can't take her body with him after that. That is why this is a problem, because she can just marry the guy, strip him of what he has right after and that was that end of story. The guy has no way to prevent this nor can he do anything similar.
Another reason is, she is using him for money and he is using her for sex. So one in giving something that just involves a pleasure moment and the other is giving what took him years, sweat and blood to get.
Finally what if the guy is good looking and has money? She has both things while he only has her looks. He is giving much more than she does.
I view a gold-digger as someone who uses another person for their money. Like, they dont actually love them and are only in it for the cash. So I view gold-diggers as being bad, there’s nothing sexist about it. If a guy was doing the same thing, it would be bad as well. “Hottie-diggers” aren’t a thing. If you find someone attractive, then you are attracted to them. Gold-diggers aren’t attracted to them, they are attracted to the money. Simply valuing money is different from using someone just to get your hands on their money.
Woman are shallow for looks aswell, not saying that all of yous do but there is a good amount of yous. And i think its stupid as fuck to go into a relationship just because the guy can buy you nice things, your not in love with the guy you in love with the money, at least the guy who goes for looks loves something that comes to you naturally, and not something you dont get until you hit a job that requires you to work 60+ hours a week. Both types are shallow as fuck and i would hate to be in a relationship because of my wealth and not for my looks/ personality.
Nothing is bad about it. I dont u understand the men that keep them around just pay the whore and let her go. If you want family date rich woman or woman on your level.
But usyay the only thing gold digger has to offer pussy24/7 when I want it and hot body.
I couldn't keep a chick around me like that here take this cash and be my slut for few hours. But if that's the case I rather fuck a porn star .
Gold digger and sugar baby enabling men are just lonely dudes who can't really fuck and want some friends not even female companionship just friends
I don't condone either behavior, but I agree with this completely.
Can't wait to see how many guys get salty about this
This is a controversial subject. There is even salty girls here complaining about the double standard.
I don't have nothing against the girl that do this. I have against the men that go for them. I think they are stupid has hell.
Would you get salty if a man wanted you for your money? Or if he wanted to just fuck you because he was horny? Or if he wanted to get over his ex? Would this make you salty?
And also, it's very different for a man to want a woman for her body than a woman to want a man for his looks.
A woman can get her own money by getting a job etc, a man can't create pussy out of nowhere.
If this post makes a guys 'salty' they have all the right in the world.
@ThisGuyDucks men consistently try and reach way out of their league. They could get an average girl. Just like women could get a man with a median-income
That absolutely makes no sense, even average looking women have guys running after her.
Heck, just be a woman and you'll have guys after you.
So the idea that men ignore average women and only after models is stupid. Most men are in relationships.
Men absolutely do go for the ugly/fat/average girl.
Stop making shit up to make up for your gold digging personality.
If all you seek a man for is money, then own up to it and don't be ashamed by it.
Guys are humans with feelings they're allowed to get salty when you tell them all they're good for is cash.
@ThisGuyDucks do not confuse me with asker. I openly said I do not condone gold digging, or pursuing a girl just for her looks.
Average looking/ugly looking women do NOT have men running after them, lol
Thisismyopinion you probably didn’t noticed that but usually the only kind
Of guys average looking women attract turn out to be ugly, and when he match her look he always turn out to be broke because he don’t stand a chance with women on his league. That’s usually for that that when a good looking man date an average looking woman peoples get as surprised as is they saw an alien
The only kind of what? Men? If you mean men then no, we go for more than just looks.
Are you saying a good looking guy can't get a girl his league unless he isn't broke?
That is not true. If it was then every girl in the world would just be thirsty for money and nothing more.
So the type of guy average women like turns out to be ugly, so women want men for their attractiveness.
Are you stupid OP?
They try but most of the time girl out of their league reject them
@asker disagree i see Good looking men with average women all the time
Emily2375 are u The typical ( I’m not like the other girls) type? Stop bashing your own gender to look special. I doubt you would reject a rich man lol
@asker let women have different opinions without you trying to shut them down.
You're a cash hungry prostitute doesn't mean every other woman is.
Some woman want actual relationships with men.
Girls have nothing to offer but looks, so of course we go for their looks. We offer a ton more than just our money
@Rangers Oh dear. You again, the guy who thinks telling the cops about a death threat is snitching.
(Good) Women have compassion, intelligence, their own financial benefits to bring to the table, the ability to have children.
Their compassion is shown very well through their absence of remorse for doing nothing but deceiving and using men for money. Their intelligence... I don't think I need to even go there. Financial benefits? You mean the stuff they don't share but the guys have to? Children are super draining in every way.
@Rangers sad little MGTOW
Go to a gun store and get yourself a 12 gauge shotgun
That's about your other post, and my life is actually going quite well since I don't let leeches, oh, my bad, women in it.
@asker many girl's do reject rich men that's why many of them are incel.
@Asker would you go for a guy just for his money?
I disagree profoundly. The terms explain everything wrong with being a gold-digger rather than being a hottie-digger. A gold-digger is a person dating someone they don't have feelings for but they date them for their money while hottie-diggers have actual feelings for the person they're dating but search for a person that looks better because that's what gets them going.
The hottie-digger is as common with both and female's tends to lie about it to not get caught.
Gold diggers are usually not honest about what they are doing, puts up drama if someone mention it or confront it. they doesn't stand for what they are doing, shows signals that they have internal conflicts what they are doing is a bad thing.
There's the problem!
Also that it's the same as luxurity prostitution, give sex to get things.
Couldn't care less about if both parties are okay with it and are cristal clear about it.
People have their thing's they like.
First of all, shallow relationships are actually not relationships, they are agreements. A gold digger relationship is an agreement between a rich guy/girl and a hot guy/girl where one provides money and other provides sex! You need to understand that money and sex aren't the end of the world. Most female sugar babies are emotionally unsatisfied like all the time. Plus, an agreement can be terminated at will. If I am a sugar daddy and you're a sugar baby and I found someone hotter, I'll leave you. That's not a relationship, that's an agreement.
Except there's no difference than in any other relationship, and by definition it is a relationship.
If you are cultural and respect your virginity and wait till marriage before sex then you'll see the true meaning of relationships. Tho mordern day dating is a sex agreement between two friends who agree to lie each other and sat that they love each so yeah! You're correct.
Except even marriage was historically based in traditions of paying for the bride or groom and trying to find wealthy partners. It has nothing to do with virginity.
Are you dumb? Marriage was based in traditions of raising a family and keeping the generation alive in the best way! And study has proven that as the number of sex partners increase, the chances of getting divorce also increase.
You're right. If men look primarily for looks they should not be bothered if the girl is also looking for something in specific.
If you make him happy cause what he's looking for is looks, it's just well deserved, each get what they want. Perfect combo.
A gold digger is no better than a ho. Gold digging is a form of objectification and dishonesty; if you hate a person's guts, his money will not suddenly make him likeable. It can be said to be a type of social irresponsibility, in that you are seeking wealth to which you are not entitled and which is not really yours since you did not legitimately work for it. Since gold diggers' marriages often end with divorces that prove very expensive for the other individual, gold digging is a form of stealing. Gold diggers usually have nothing of value to offer to the other person, since real love doesn't exist there anyway.
If my wife were to die, I would eventually find a nice HOT 21-year-old, who I could lust after and provide me as much sex as I wanted. My needs are simple, I earned the money my only real love has died, now I must go find some women with children 30 kg oversize and live with that. NO NO NO I have had a vasectomy, men always end up paying for sex, even worse when you are married. So I will pay for what I want, not what you lot of fat old women think, it is MY money and I can spend it any way I like. That's why you don't like it you lot want to tell me who I can fuck LOL LOL LOL
I don't think anything good ever comes from being with someone for shallow reasons, be it money or looks. I also don't agree with the statement that it's okay for men to pursue women for looks but not for women to pursue men for money, I think both get an equal amount of criticism for being with someone for either of those reasons.
You described it perfectly, there's absolutly NOTHING wrong with it.
You are both going in KNOWING what the other is gaining from the relationship.
The man gains hot young arm candy and feelings of youth
And the woman gains wealth and stability.
The only men upset about this are the ones who do not have enough money to get the same perks!. Get over it
Window. Jump.
They are lousy when it comes to loyalty, as soon as old man Lester looses him bank, she wanders off denies ever liking him in the first place. They are essentially con-artists who live as a parasite leeching of other people. Overall it involves lying, manipulating, disloyalty and self-indulgence which are all the traits of someone I despise, especially disloyalty.
If a woman is 100% honest and up-front about it, I have no problem with gold-diggers. It's the evil bitches who pretend they want "love" but only manage to see rich men as being capable of giving "love", that I hate.
Of course, once they've turned into old hags (say about age 35--the shelf life of a gold-digger is VERY short), they don't get to whine. They had better have locked something up by then.
Note that a gold-digger turns into an old hag at a MUCH younger age than do many other types of women. The sweeter her soul, the longer her shelf life. I've met women in their 70s who were still lovely (and some were still even a bit hot). Every one of them had the sweetest nature and demeanor.
That's actually false. I've seen multiple stories of gold diggers managing to find husbands into their elderly years.
@wolfcat87, the men must be already on life support machines or those women must be world-class cum-guzzlers. The former is sad. The second is excellent.
I agree that there should not be a double standard here but I'm not sure there is one. I think that when an older man marries a trophy wife, he is looked down upon as much as she is. Both are seen as conducting a kind of shallow transaction. Maybe that's not the case, but it certainly is in the circles I'm familiar with.
And now be honest with yourself, turn it around, if you could be together with a man who you don't love you are just attracted to and there is an other man who is 3 times hotter and you are super attracted to him. You see, if you are together with someone because you like her and you are attracted to her, that's not the same as you are together with someone that you are not attracted to and you are with him only because of money. In fact I don't see too much difference between a gold diger and a prostitute, they both do it for money... Oh wait the prostitute does not lie about why she is doing it.
Hottie-digger is not a term because gold can be digged and hotties can not. That doesn't mean men aren't judged for being shallow which is definitely the case.
Also: Beauty is part of the person. If you like someone's looks you at least like that part of them.
Money is not about the person. If you're only after money you literally don't care about the guy at all, he could be 90 years old, he could be gay, he could be a she. It means you don't value anything about the guy himself. And that is definitely an absolute no-go in a relationship.
It's not a great comparison because men aren't money. Women are their looks. Either way though, just be honest about you wanting them for their money and I think it's totally fine. When you lie about really liking them for them, then I think that's where it's unethical.
Women are their look? So I guess it’s fair to reject a woman because she isn’t pretty enough, without being shallow right? But why is it bad to reject a man because he isn’t rich enough? It’s even more unfair toward women because beauty is something she doesn’t truly control, unlike success
The word shallow is dumb to me. We all like shallow things. Liking dick or a vagina is considered shallow. I don't agree with people saying attraction shouldn't matter. Yes it's okay to reject a man or women for their looks along with any other issue you have with them.
I'm not saying it's bad to reject a man if he isn't rich. If you need a 6 foot tall man with good looks and money, that's fine for you. If you only want a guy for him money, that's okay but I consider that using him so I think it's important to not lie about why you like him.
It's important to be open about why you like a partner in general. If a guy only like her ass, I think she would want to know that as well. Usually when that happens, the guys uses her for sex and will be in a friends with benefits type situation. If both parties are happy with that, great. Just don't lie.
A girl acting like she wants him but only likes his money is wrong because he may want a real loving partner.
Also if wealth was easy to obtain, you wouldn't be using men for it. You'd get wealthy yourself. Looks can be heavily improved by having a fit body, yet 70% of Americans are overweight.
What? I think the opposite is true. Dudes get shit for going after a chick just for her looks. I think it's more acceptable for women to be with a guy for his money. I don't hear as much backlash on that.
I don't know why other broads think this. Maybe because they're more focused on the female aspect. Try looking from all angles. Both get a good amount of shit.