Do female "womanizers" exist?

[nella965]

"womanizer" is for men.
what term is for women?

[COMMODOREII]

Its a man-eater

[In_Trance]

Manizer

[Joey_007]

I don't think so. The thing that makes womanizers admirable is being able to get something that's tough to get that many want and unlike with girls hooking up with a guy isn't a difficult thing to do therefore it isn't an achieve it can be a great experience but not an achievement. Maybe gold diggers say what you will but I don't imagine it being a walk in the park.

[nella965]

womanizers aren't about getting hookups. they are the types who cannot commit to any relationship. they are not monogamous. If she flirts with you, you would assume she's interested or physically attracted to you. But in reality, she does this to many others guys behind your back too. You are nothing special to her. She enjoys flirting a lot and floats from guy to the next guy.

[Joey_007]

A woman garnering attention from men isn't a difficult thing to do the vast majority of you can do it but if a woman could instill loyalty into just one (even more commendable for multiple guys) guy who's good looking, stable and competent enough around women then yeah that is an achievement but convincing guys you think they're special, when you don't and flirting with multiple guys isn't an achievement especially without their knowledge (even a womanizer who hides his true intentions is less commendable than one who doesn't) you're a woman of course you can a womanizer is seen as a man among men a woman who can flirt and make men think their special is something that comes with being a woman. If a woman could openly sleep with the type of guys guys respect, who call women who sleep around things like "slut" and "whore" without them calling her that or badmouthing her among their friends (more commendable if they openly defend her when others criticise her) that's an achievement, if a womanizer only garnered attention from women men consider "sluts", "easy" or "whores" his title is revoked.

[nella965]

@joey_007. You would be surprised at how easy it is for a man to get attention of women, if he is good looking , financially stable , or successful. Men who have a hard time getting a woman’s attention are usually nothing special or subpar. I live in New York City full of handsome tall, financially well off, well educated, white men.

If any of these guys pay me any attention , trust me I will swoon.

It’s easy to get women. Because reality is , women want you , they just aren’t brave enough to show it

[nella965]

@joey_007 I am a female womanizer. I flirt with all sorts of guys. Most single guys are looking for monogamy. And frequently when I flirt with them they assume I am interested and also seeking a monogamous relationship.

[Joey_007]

It's different I know women want men too but the challenge lies in the approach when a man approaches a woman he's in danger of losing sex appeal when a woman approaches a man she's in danger of losing respect and the thing that places them above the rest (grants them the title womanizer or female equivalent) is they're tongue and wit and the more norms they are able violate whilst maintaining they're worth the higher their commendability a woman who can approach and consistently draw multiple respectable men's favour, definitely a skill worth having won't take that away from you but that's not why anyone is there it's no different from those youtubers who go around asking girls for their number a neat skill to have but we all know that's not the point it's only a step towards achieving what it is we're really after whether it be a hook up, money or relationship

[nella965]

@joey_007 let me tell you something. Most couples do not meet by standing around the corner , approaching women , handing out phone numbers.

Most couples meet through acquaintances or friends or at parties or social events.

I can tell you don’t have any real world experience.

Women are more likely to be drawn to wit , humor and personality. While men are more likely to be drawn to looks , a cute voice or a hot body

[nella965]

@joey_007 both men and women lose ego and pride if they get turned down by the opposite gender. It’s not any different based on gender.

Most men never approach. Most women never approach.

[Joey_007]

Every guy has seen a woman walk down the street and hoped for either one night with her or hoped for the possibility of getting to know her and they didn't because they knew or thought the didn't have the silver tongue to do it (if their attractive), or the looks to pull it off on top of that (if they/think they aren't attractive) the mark of a womanizer is this guy isn't going to walk away he's taking her to bed if he wants to maybe not today but eventually not because other guys aren't as attractive as he is but because he knows how to cross the line without being prosecuted for it, the wit to say the right thing the right way at the right time whether it be humorous, serious, seductive, witty or playful as long as the goal is achieved.

You don't get to be called a womanizer and do things I can do hanging around friend circles for dates or hookups isn't an extraordinary it's common, you have to get the girls I can't get in situations I can't.

I'm a guy and I'm drawn to wit, sense of humour, personality, career orientation, loyalty and respect to those deserving of your respect as for cute voices no it's a good sign a person has no backbone or assertion etc. but only in someone I want to spend the rest of my life with if it's just a hook up I don't care if you miss slavery

side note:
MRW i'm Tiger Woods, and i fuck bitches

[Joey_007]

[Joey_007]

That wasn't a douchie thing to do was it

[nella965]

What you’re referring to is not called a womanizer. It’s called being a man whore. A womanizer is not someone who just does hookups. A womanizer is someone who flirts, leads women on, even date multiple women at once , enjoying their company
You don’t even know what a womanizer is.

A womanizer can meet women from any where regardless of its the streets or parties or from acquaintances.

But it is the truth that most people do not meet their girlfriend/bfs from approaching strangers. This is something that happens more in movies and tv shows than in real life. This is how I can tell you lack real life experience

I know from experience that women are more drawn to personality while men are more drawn to looks and cuteness. You don’t have to argue with me on that. I’m the one with real world experience here

[Joey_007]

Womanizer and man whore are the same thing being a whore is something people built up because of their egos being shattered by the idea that they could do something with someone they deem meaningful only to find out it was worthless to the other meaning they themselves are worthless to someone they thought they meant something to, so rather than seeming themselves at fault they attempt to save face by pointing a finger at the other.

To me dating in order to get sex isn't a difficult thing to do everybody can clearly do it and the only reason the majority of people don't isn't because they can't it's because it's tedious and illogical. The only reason guys date multiple women at the same time is the lack of wit, being incapable to bed women without being dishonest this is a womanizer without skill a womanizer only by the number of women he's with casanova is one of the most renowned womanizers and was known for being one because of seducing multiple women not committing to them. To me there are levels to this and the one you're talking is at the bottom of the barrel. Being flirtatious is a character trait not a mark of being a womanizer.


if this guy has wit and personality you wouldn't date or sleep with him


but if this guy does you would

therefore you care about looks to the extent men care about looks he's not really that attractive but his female equivalent can get attention from men, now if wanted a relationship and she had personality, wit etc. I'd get to know her, if she didn't, no but if I just wanted to hook up with her I wouldn't care about who she is as a person.

[nella965]

@joey_007 You don't even understand what womanizer means. A womanizer is someone who uses women to boost his ego. Get into a relationship with a woman, trick her that he loves her, then ditch her. By breaking her heart, he gets an ego boost from the attention.

A man-whore is someone who never intended to break anyones heart or see women as conquest. He just wants to get laid.

[Joey_007]

dictionary.cambridge.org/.../womanizer
why are you fighting me on this definition

[Joey_007]

wait a minute who you cheating on

[Joey_007]

Damn it I f. cked up & I'm sorry I was somewhat wrong not completely my last argument is this but you decide whether it's acceptable or not it's a stretch but there might be some truth to it the simile for womanizer is philanderer and the google definition is "a man who readily or frequently enters into casual sexual relationships with women; a womanizer." from here I want you to pay attention to the word readily one of the definition google lists for readily is "without delay or difficulty; easily." which is what I've been arguing now since I've been a dumbass you get to decide whether it holds water or not whatever you decide is valid no clue why I didn't notice sooner maybe I got too excitable, I don't know but the ball is in your court. who gets the win?

[nella965]

Womanizer is a different word for a man-whore. If they meant the same things then they should be the same word.

Womanizers do it for the attention and ego boost , not the sex.

[Joey_007]

I'd argue George Clooney is known as a womanizer but not a heart breaker

[nella965]

womanizing and man whore are two different things with two different purposes

[Joey_007]

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Manwhore
3rd and most liked definition says otherwise

[nella965]

Womanizer definition

A person (usually male) who plays with multiple women's emotions until he gets them to have feelings for him and then ends the relationships the second they do. Usually suffer from Peter Pan Syndrome because they just can't grow up and it's all a game to them.

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php

[nella965]

As you mentioned in your answer , there is an ego boost for a man to get a woman since it’s more difficult.

Having casual sex doesn’t necessarily give people an ego boost. Casual sex is just a desire of sex, not ego boost

An ego boost is getting a woman to fall for you. Just like you said in your answer, it’s harder to get someone to fall for you than sx

[Joey_007]

Fine I give cheers

[Joey_007]

sup @nella965 I've got a question and I'd like your take on it
Why would you not date outside your race or are you unattracted to people outside (mostly interested in black guys but do you) your race? ↗

[LZPanzer]

There called normal people. Not sure why you want to assign titles to normal behavior.

[abc3643]

Slut

[doopayo]

Seems like a double standard...

[abc3643]

@doopayo Not really. Just a different word. A womanizer is just as bad.

[abc3643]

... although a more modern, less polite way of saying "womanizer" is "manwhore".

[nella965]

i think womanizer always had been less of a negative connotation compared to slut.

[abc3643]

In a sense, I don't disagree because males are evolved to be sluttier than females. Since it's more of an expected behavior, it's less shocking.

[nella965]

I don’t think that’s a valid excuse to justify poor behavior.

Similar example :

Female species have evolved to mate with males that are strong fit and can provide for them. Does that mean all females are gold diggers? NO

[abc3643]

It's not a valid excuse to justify that behavior.
It has nothing to do with justification but with expectation.

And I agree with your evolution example.

[Shihab91]

Menizer?