Why do females find Jeremy Meeks far more attractive than Andrew Tate?

[InsecureLivesMatter]

[Weapon77]

It's pretty obvious, but I'll lay it out. This Meeks guy has fantastic facial structure and symmetry with a great jawline, skull shape, and eyes. He also just looks better groomed, and whether or not that's true, it makes a huge difference for women. Add to that that this Meeks guy is calm and confident, and it's no wonder ladies enjoy him

Tate on the other hand has a kinda wonky head shape, receded chin, and his eyes have the look of someone who is insecure or creepy. In his case, it's both. He gives off the vibe of a loser trying to be alpha, and that's exactly what he is. Some human's can just sense stuff like that, and many woman can even though men are probably better at assessing other men since we had to evolve to be able to compete with other men (we have a sense of who is weaker than us mentally and physically).

Add to that that many women have seen Tate speak and interact with people, and he's extremely socially awkward, even though he's trying to be dominant. He's clunky. Not smooth at all. Talks too fast too. But the Meeks dude talks slow and has a better voice, and has great body language. No contest

[inhua]

both are confident bad boys but it seems like the more of a "bad boy" you are, the more attractive you are to women even though Andrew Tate's body count far eclipses that of Jeremy Meeks

in terms of hatred Andrew Tate receives far more of it despite Jeremy Meeks' crimes are actually proven whereas Andrew Tate's "crimes" are merely allegations that have so far shown no evidence of such

also it seems the women who defend Andrew Tate are a lot more reasonable than the women who defend Jeremy Meeks. the women who defend Andrew Tate talk about his kind personality and heart whereas the women who defend Jeremy Meeks only talk about how hot he is.

lmao at Jeremy Meeks being considered "smart"

this is the Halo Effect in full force. keep in mind there are much better men out there than these 2 bad boys but women wouldn't even go near them with a 10 foot pole because those men aren't considered attractive

[bamesjond0069]

Photos aren't equivalent quality for comparison. Meeks is far superior dress, and it's a solo shot, shows his face better.

Too few votes.

Andrew tate is too popular to ever get a 100% true vote. Some girl sees it and knows him and is a hater and will make him low not off the photo but what she knows or think she knows.

Lastly Meeks IS more attractive based off just face structure. Tate has a better body most likely since he is an athlete. Photos don't show that.

[Anonymous]

Andrew Tate is an ugly douchebag. Nothing he says is actually notable. And he’s loving the money he’s getting from that attention. The other dude is at least a model. And even though that did went to jail, he has better qualities than Tate.

[inhua]

how does Meeks have better qualities than Tate when he has an actual criminal record?

[Opinion Owner]

@inhua so does Meeks. And I knew a guy who went to prison, and went to college afterwards. Now has a wife and kids, so he changed his life around. Just like Meeks

[inhua]

Tate doesn't have a criminal record though. Meeks has actually killed someone. how does Meeks have better qualities than Tate?

[Dav1dTh0ma389]

If I could punch Tate in the face, I would

[LimitedBenefits101]

Females love cheaters.

[Anonymous]

Beats me.