<------- Not a genius.
How would you rate your intelligence?
<------- Not a genius.
i have no way of knowing for sure,
and i dont believe those iq tests, cos there's so many variables that can make u perform differntly... for example oneday u may be having concentration problems... then it will take u longer to do the test, resulting in a lower score,
and then another day u may be more awake and alert and understand the question more clearly... giving you a higher score,, u know what i mean?
there's no guarenteed accurate way of getting ur score,,, only estimations,
and im too cheap to pay for 1 of those tests anyway lol,
but im just gonna say im dumb, cos i dont wanna sound conceited or egotistical...
also i make a lot of dumb mistakes and it takes me a long time to understand things compared to most people, and some times i dont even get the thing im trying to understand at all nomatter how long i think about, so i probably have some kind of learning disability
Well I can't do any thing aboveong division
And i don't know what photosynthesis aside from saying how plants grow up.
But i can go in depth about history, philosophy and theology.
I struggled to learn what im not interested in. I just won't take it in.
I think iv a lot of emotional intelligence, or rather its very strong empathy I don't know. That is my perticular kind of intelligence.
I took an iq test once it said 146.
I never took it again cause i was afraid itd go down lol.
I don't believe anyone on this site can score more than 110 on this test
http://test.mensa.no/
post screenshot of your result
If you had answered every question correctly it will just say you have an IQ of 145+
Did you answer every question wrong? 😂 how is that even possible lol, children can do the first few question, where's your screenshot? it's okay you can take it again, the result won't be different :)) this test is robust that way
I couldn't get onto the test, but I probably wouldn't have gotten a high score if the entire test is based on knowing which shape should be next.
I'm not good with shapes or numbers. I don't think that makes me slow or of under average intelligence. I'd never base my intelligence on these type of IQ tests.
I have a good paying job and I've been promoted. I I have achieved so much in my life. I consider myself successful in all aspects of my life... and that's without needing to have a high IQ for knowing what shape comes next lol
Superior, literally.
http://test.mensa.no/
Even if it's an online test, the calibration is still done in a large population of people who take the test. So if you score in the 90 percentile, it still means you're better than 90% of the tested population. The relative result among different users is still significant. Takes less than 20 minutes to see if the people who claim to have IQ of 140+ are full of shit
I got a 105 ... whew!! 63%tile
It's just logic, pattern recognition and speed of processing, right? It's not testing other types of intelligence... like if I can decorate a room, choose the right pair of shoes to go with an outfit, or smell the freshest vegtables, read others emotions. Just whether I'd want to hire you to do quant analysis for my hedge fund or launch a rocket. Why do we value logic so much? cool test though...
@lightbulb27 At least you're honest. I salute you for that. Whereas the people who claim 147 IQ and 186 IQ are making excuses even though the test should've taken like 10 minutes for people of that bracket lol
Well, I am in that bracket and it still takes 20 minutes :))
First of all I have never seen that vid, second of all, that guy in the video is wrong on several questions, but so am I, probably. The whole reason I bring this test here is to show how many people lie about their IQ on the internet. You must understand how annoying it is, considering my result is high enough to trigger your inferiority complex so that you think I have to fake it. Like the guy above, I can also explain every single one of my answer. So your conspiracy theory is debunked, okay?
See 12:50, the guy in your second vid just runs multiple tests at once to get the correct answers, then he made up the rule to fit the results... That's why his explanations are super contrived lol
It seems to me none of them actually know the reasoning. I'm gonna tell you this, it's actually simpler than what they are presenting, and you're willing to believe they have the answers lol
Nothing? it shouldn't take that long to go over the test and ask some questions, considering you already have all the answers you found from googling, just with no correct reasoning :))
I'm not gonna spend all day waiting in this thread to explain these trivial results to you, perhaps @Tessa01 can do it. IF she can't, I might come back to this thread.
@Asker That's some weird cope mechanism right there lol
How do you explain the 31st question then @IlyaTheImpaler, cos in the vid our asker found the guy said he couldn't solve it then he just run the test 4 times lol he said he got higher IQ with B therefore B is correct 😂
@Tessa01
Yup he's wrong, it's a simple binary operation, so symmetry must be preserved, so B, C, E are eliminated first. The correct answer is D, A and F would make the operation ill defined. As I wrote above, Asker never realized that both guys he posted have at least 1 wrong answer lol
And how do these sad people spend so much time to simulate this test to extract the answers and still get them wrong lmao It's just an online test, if you do badly at it there's still chance you're gonna do well in real life tests :)
@IlyaTheImpaler that's hilarious 🤣
@Asker you need to chill lol. I dislike people boasting about muh IQ that's the whole reason for posting this test, sorry for triggering you, it's not like anyone is saying if you do badly on these tests then you're dumb. Cheer up 😂
Y'all lost me with trying to prove it way too hard.
Another fun quote.
You can clearly see that this man wasn't a genius, because the more the two of you talk the less I believe you.
You have also tried pretty hard with your search for the answers, but the two videos are not enough to support your belief, both of them contain wrong answers as pointed out... so you want to believe that we tried too hard to perhaps fool you into thinking we're geniuses 😂 I can tell you I am not a genius. It's my bad for posting this, sorry, but again, I dont believe anyone who claim to have 140+ IQ in this question :) except for one outlier. The other poster didn't reply to your question but to my provocation, so we can just ignore him. Typically people would say `I was tested when I was in grade school and I had 190 IQ` lool sure.
Why are you still going at it, the only thing an IQ test tests is how well you do on IQ tests... This is why I was asking about the over all performance, not IQ test results.
som.yale.edu/.../why-high-iq-doesnt-mean-youre-smart
Nobody in this conversation is saying high IQ = intelligent, you just sort of jumped in and went on and on about it for some reason. If you're honest about your opinion, like how you dislike IQ because you believe it doesn't measure intelligence, maybe you should've spammed image macros on the people who answer your question about intelligence with their IQ (incidentally all top 10% to 0.01%) 😂
It's 'How would YOU rate your intelligence? How do YOU usually feel you perfom?' NOT "What is your intelligence according to IQ tests? / "How do YOU peform on IQ tests?" You not understanding the question also gives me many doubts here.
You - "Superior, literally." after which you go on to post your IQ results, "screenshot with a tab of this thread, basically verifying I actually took the test and this is my result" ... I'm starting to wonder if you might be in the borderline impaired.. Or is it memory loss?
`Superior literally` is an answer to your question.
The test is to show people who claim to have 140+ IQ will do the same as everyone else, in the average range. No where in anyone's post do we claim the result = our IQ or our IQ = our intelligence.
It is clear you just got butthurt because you score like 55 or something on the test, so you had to google its answers 😂. That's also the reason you have no problem with people who claim to have 140+ IQ therefore they are superior as an answer to your question, but you keep bothering me about this. Now you're trying to insult me 😂, what a stupid person you are.
Opinion
26Opinion
Okay, I'm sorry but I have to be 'that' person who points out that Alfred Binet, the guy who invented the IQ test, didn't invent it as a measure of intelligence. It was intended to be used only to identify students at schools that needed extra help - basically anyone under a certain level was falling behind, but anyone above that was satisfactory. Once they reached the satisfactory level, the rest was not actually designed to compare students, nor did it fairly do so. Binet was actually very specific about his intentions for the use of the test, and was rather unhappy about how it had been misused.
That being said, I only know all of that because I'm a genius, clearly 💁♀️ Lmao, I'm kidding of course - about the genius statement, not the previous paragraph that is. IQ tests actually do a pretty bad job of measuring 'intelligence' because there are several kinds of intelligence and even though there are tests for each of them, it's almost impossible to prevent improvement in an area when actually taking the test. Anyway, intelligence is fricking complicated 😂
i think there are different kinds of intelligences and everyone has their own highs and lows, labeling intelligence just puts people in a box with no room to grow
Your absolutely correct. What this poll really shows is your level of confidence with your intelligence
True, but some people simple are a little slower. We're not all equal, thats for sure.
Yea, but slower concerning what? Math?, science?, art?, business?, law?, mechanics?, chemistry?, culinary?, computers?, technology?, stock?, intelligence is a broad subject. You can be weak in one thing but strong in another, does that make you less smart? No. That’s why some “IQ test” is bs
that's the whole point of my initial comment. it was when you said that we all aren't equal where i disgree. if you meant it in different subjects, yeah that's exactly my point, but if you meant it in a person's overall importance, i wouldn't agree because being more intelligent doesn't make someone more deserving than others
Superior - My IQ is 147, so high to an exceptional extent but not quite at the genius level
I don't believe anyone on this site can score more than 110 on this test
http://test.mensa.no/
post screenshot of your result
@Tessa01 I studied biochem and pre-med, and I was also in Gifted and Talented in 3-12. To get into the TAG program the first thing they do is give you an IQ test, and you have to make at least 130 to be considered as Gifted and Talented. And you’re talking about 3rd grade when I was tested and was accepted... Not everybody is stupid lol, although I agree that there are plenty of people on here who are 🤣 but yeah... it’s not like you can tell me that I’m wrong, considering on a daily basis I’m at the medical school here. My dad even graduated from here at Yale. So you can’t tell me I’m not valid, when I have unlimited proof all around me every day
I'm not even telling you you're wrong, the fact is you're simply claiming to attend school X to study Y on a website where nobody can verify your claim :))) that should say enough about your life achievements.
What I'm telling you is you can't score more than 110 on the test I gave you, like most of the people on this site, you probably believe you're smarter than them. I'm telling you that unlike your mega special genius program, or Alien's existence, it can be verified that you're not smarter than most of the people on this site within 20 minutes.
No, it cannot be as easy, it's not 50/50 that you have an IQ significantly above others. When you flip an unbiased coin, there are only 2 options, there is 50% chance, that means it's as easy to be tail or head. When someone claim they are in the 0.01% of the population, there is 0.01% chance they are right. Basic probability.
That's some weak grasp in logic right there lol
@Tessa01 Considering the entire population, yeah, but the entire population has no effect on what I would make on the test if I took it. Do you actually know anything about probability? Like, if you put 9 red marbles in a jar and 1 blue marble, it’s not 50/50 because there being significantly more reds affects what you draw. The entire population doesn’t affect my test scores. There is no scientific relationship. Consider your dependent and independent variables and make a science equation with it. Would the percentage of the general population determine how common or uncommon My IQ is? Yes, absolutely. That’s why I put “superior” compared to the majority. But does everyone else, or even that percentage, actually have the ability to change how well I do on that test? Nope. Speaking of logic... You should read about probability and maybe some basic science. 😊
And by the way, I have better things to do than to argue about what YOU think My IQ is, especially since I don’t even know you. If you aren’t interviewing me for a job or an education, then your opinion isn’t really relevant. So there’s no reason to keep on about this.
@Tessa01 scoring hight on that test isn't hard since all the answers are out https://youtu.be/RvpGnSuzmt4
Those are not answers, those are some guy's answers, and they are not correct. He simply does better than most.
I can be everything from this list. Different times, different situations, different areas -> different results. There really isn't a dominating one. My mind is a mystery to me. Maybe most times jumping between genius, average and delayed without any clear system, but that's rather a kind of informative guess.
High Average. Or bright. Not sure but I know when I was younger I did one IQ test and got something around 120, but I have forgotten if it was a bit lower than 120 or a bit higher. However those tests only mesure logical intelligence. If it was about kinesthetic intelligence I would be under average for sure.
I was told a lot i am intelligent but my math tests say otherwise
Being good at math is one type of intelligence but it isn't the only one.
Einstein flunked math class
I'd normally say intelligent, I tend to figure things out easier than people around me, and I have been called intelligent my whole life, but on the other hand, I haven't figured out how to achieve some basic shit that every moron in the world can, so from that side I'm obviously a complete imbecile. So the jury is still out on that.
Well, I have sometimes doubts that I'm not that smart like my test scores.
Being stupid like a bun and being ignorant is really sometimes a bliss.
I probably perform around high average? I'm definitely capable of more, but lack the motivation and self discipline to achieve any higher
I'd say average, but with enough situational awareness to fake genius if I had to.
your eyes are super small or are you squinting?
i thought so but wasn't quite sure if you were or not
Like Harry Leland (the Black Bishop), my Reason is two levels higher in law than in other areas. Unlike him, I also have a very high emotional intelligence.
"Mad Professor" ?
I handle stuff well, but... :D
I've taken multiple IQ tests and usually end up around 130-140 but due to tough times I dumbed myself down (regretfully on purpose) with the help of dumb shit and weed. I don't even know if I would make it up to 120 now
I am intellectually disabled. The dunning-kruger effect is going strong on this site, by the way.
Lol probably above average i was told in grade five i had a IQ of 186 but that was clearly bullshit
I don't believe anyone on this site can score more than 110 on this test
http://test.mensa.no/
post screenshot of your result, I am asking at least other users to do this too. At least we see if relative results are consistent among the users who claim to have IQ of 140+ (which seems to be all of them lol)
Clearly you dont understand how the iq scale works then its a standard deviation system 51% of people will score between 90 -110 with of course means 24.5 % of the population is on ether side of the that range but as intelligents is nearly impossible to accurately measure scientifically expesssaly on the internet iq is at best a lose guideline witch is pointless i know my actual IQ as i have took about two dozen different IQ tests for various sources as i have been is many psychological studies but its not something i brag about
Did you just parrot what some website says about IQ test lol you have no idea how the standardized population was selected for this test.
Even if the result is not absolute IQ, it's still the relative result in comparison to people who take the test, if you understand how the IQ scale work you wouldn't have this much difficulty understand the meaning of your result.
The iq test doesn't matter its a standard deviation system based on population its high school math and i never took a online iq test i have always been giving them by professionals with several doctorates
People have carried on
And on about my intelligence my whole life but if I'm any smarter than average then average must be real dumb
High Average-Average.
I know i'm not that intelligent, but i know i'm not stupid either i'm smarter than i come across though.
Some of my professors might say borderline impaired, but I do well enough.
Another easy one...
Everyone thinks they're smarter than everyone else.
I did manage to retire before I even got a job just by playing my cards right sooooo.. I think I'm above average :)
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions