When you're children will stay 11 months. In school and only one month vacation
If you were rich, would you put your children in private school?
When you're children will stay 11 months. In school and only one month vacation
I don't think I'd send my children to private school. In my opinion if you have time and money, you should probably invest some of that time into teaching your own children and then expose them to the general public via public school to socialize them. That said, with some of the behavior in public schools these days you have to be diligent to keep on top of what is happening with your children. My reasoning is as follows. 1) My older brother attended Saint Andrew's School through middle school and half of high school. Tuition there for middle school is $39,455, for high school it is $42,690, and for boarding school it is $72,420 per year. From my observation the education isn't necessarily better, it's more so that you are exposed to a private boys club of wealthy families. When people pay big money for their kids to attend school they have better behavior in the classroom so that is an advantage over public school, but on it's own the subject matter is relatively similar. You may study Latin as an extracurricular or something to that extend, but the bread and butter of the daily education is the same. It's mainly just a networking experience that I'd say psychologically damages kids. It's all about who is richer than one another, what Ivy League School your father went to, and stupid shit like that. It skews your perspective on life and leaves you ungrounded in reality. This can lead to a psychological break later in life... 2) My aunt's family own's the top ranked private school in Florida... Tuition runs roughly $40,000 a year as well. My cousins attended school there. I would say they are educated to a similar level as many well performing public school students, but they are socially awkward I guess you could say. Schools don't just teach content, they teach character. The character that is taught isn't always healthy for a developing mind. So for example, my father attended St. Ann's High School and the nuns use to yell at him and smack his hands with rulers so on and so forth. It was strict and rigid... It made him relatively nonreligious as an adult, but Charles Whitman who went to school with him became a Manchurian Candidate and became the Texas Tower Sniper... The character you are taught when you are developing can make you or it can break you. Young minds are fragile... I don't want my kids ending up like this...
https://www.youtube.com/embed/x8-UalJzVnAIn the US, since education is largely supported by local provider taxes, the quality varies widely. Wealthy parent have two choices: that can move to a wealthy school district with higher home prices, or they can send their children to private school..
For high school, possibly and most likely only sons. I'd still prefer to do most of their education at home and only send them to a private school if they're extremely ambitious and I wouldn't be able to teach them myself/hire tutors/sign them up for additional courses. Any kind of organized education is indoctrination and I'd rather do things my way when they're young and impressionable.
Possibly, if he really wanted to go and it was a good school. I certainly wouldn't force him and I'd prefer a local private school but I can imagine circumstances in which I'd agree to it. It would be only for high school... which is an age when children don't want to spend time with their parents anyways. But I don't have a teenage son so it's hard to tell how I'd actually feel about it. If he didn't put the effort to keep in touch I'd probably bring him home. How was your experience? Since you spent 11 years there, I'd assume you either really liked it or you were forced to do it?
I did not have a choice, either school or returning to a church orphanage,
so I chose a school and entered that school at the age of 7,
but I get a good education, but I did not get a life like any teenager in my age,
(it was like hell 24h they spying on you )
knowing that anyone who studied with me would say the same thing. We got a good education, but We didn't get a life
So i always have this question Why would parents do something like this? To them children
That does sound awful, I'm sorry you experienced such abuse and neglect from your adoptive family and school. Do you think there's anything you can do about the school at least? Report somewhere that they abuse children? If you believe that other kids feel the same then maybe you can use that amazing education you received against them?
To answer your question - I wouldn't willingly put my child up to age at least 12 (ideally 15) in ANY school. Beyond that, I would be willing to do it if I trusted the school and my child was particularly ambitious and they wanted it while always monitoring what's happening. I wouldn't force them. That being said, I favour discipline when it comes to children... but there's many ways to reach the same goal especially if you're wealthy. You don't need to send them to a school like you described. So you're out of this school now... did the people that you work with also experienced this type of education? Was it a requirement to get to where you are?
As for why some people do this to their kids... well, some people are assholes and becoming parents doesn't change that. Could also be a rich people thing, that I couldn't tell you. As a parent you want an educated and well rounded child that is capable of thriving in the adult world and achieving their goals... but you also want a child that is attached to you and loyal to your family. Not to mention well adjusted to society and how can you achieve that if you take them out of the society? Did you ask your adoptive family about it?
I can also sympathize with you on not experiencing normal teenage phase because I also missed out on it, though for different reasons.
It is not possible to file a lawsuit against my school because it belongs to the government.
When I spoke to my family about the reason for putting me there, they said, “We just want to see you successful in your life, and this is nonsense.” The real reason is that they cannot have children and they wanted me to get a good education so that they could have children. who is going to run the family business for them, when they get older
but I rejected this topic because I wanted another way of my life. I never spoke to them again (except on birthdays and special occasions).
And now most of the people I know. Who studied in regular schools. They have a little stupidity and they don't speak many languages, unlike my childhood friends who studied with me. The least person speaks 3 languages and earns more than 500k in a year.
And the others they don't work they just spend them family money or they work in them family business
Here are some pics of our UWC international school in Wales. It's pretty much Hogwarts for rich kids.
Would I send my kids? Yes because I don't have the skills to help them navigate the super-rich world. These kids aren't being prepped to flip burgers.
Depends on whether I can stand them or not
Opinion
28Opinion
Absolutely. I live in Arizona, and if you know Arizona, we are known for having one of the worst public school systems in the country. You only get better options if you live in nicer areas, or private school. There is absolutely no way I’d put my kid through the Arizona public school system. I’d move out of the state before I let that happen.
I'm a former public school teacher. The single biggest influence on student performance is a combination of their diligence and parental involvement (often the former is determined by the latter). If your fellow students are not focused on their academic performance, your child is wasting their time, regardless of where it is.
I'd avoid sending them to an American public school. Homeschool or perhaps a montessori. You never know when the state will mandate that children at their schools eat live grubs, and maniacs have a larger supply of potential victims if they want to invade the place.
Or rather, if they decide to invade -a- place.
I might consider if the private school was local. I wouldn't send my kid to be raised by someone else for 11 months though. So we would just homeschool
Doesn't matter if I'm rich. If I have kids, they are going to private school or homeschool. I will only eat once a week if that's what it takes to afford private school for them.
If very very rich then I'd certainly think about it. Not only because they'd get a better education, but they'd make connections with people more familiar with their lifestyle.
If the private school was purely academic and not religious then yes but if it is religious no.
Of course haha, by the Grace of God I definitely will. A Christian boarding school actually
I want to a catholic boarding school myself. Church is mandatory, the uniform is usually long haha, emphasis on the bible and a strong relationship with Jesus. Hard work is promoted etc
No, I would still rather have my kids homeschooled and be able to control 100% of what they are learning. Whether a parent teaches them or we pay someone to teach exactly what we prefer our kids to learn and at what ages.
Schools have been getting steadily worse in the last 20 years. Then Covid came along and they re now in free fall. The teachers union have taken over. They are getting rid of standardized tests and nobody gets held accountable. If my kids were still in school I would have them all in private school.
@Avicenna At least it sets a standard and everyone that graduates can read and do basic math. With no accountability nobody gets left back and everyone graduates whether they can read their diploma or not. In the city where I live there are 35 high schools. The valedictorians from each high school gets a full scholarship to their choice of state school. They were revisited 4 years later and not one single one of them was able to graduate. Many dropped out after freshman year. Most were not prepared.
What would be much better is to require a project in each core subject to graduate (would be much more real world and much more interesting for the students). What happens where standardized tests are required for graduation is that students keep taking them until they pass, and that means missing a whole lot of class time to take the test for the umpteenth time. Or they're pulled out of their other classes for tutoring.
I might have agreed with you before I taught a high school basic engineering class and limited the number of written tests in favor of hands-on projects where the students chose and designed their own products. I was very pleasantly surprised how well the students (9th and 10th graders) bought in to the class and what they conjured up. When students choose their own topic, they have a lot more stake in the process rather than passively choosing an answer to a multiple-choice question.
by the way, I decided to limit the written tests because about half of my class had previously had trouble with written tests, although the lack of real-world application also factored into my decision. Fortunately, the administration (which had backgrounds in English and Social Studies) have me freedom to teach the class the way I wanted to.
The public schools here are good, in fact really good. The private schools seem to exist more for pushing a right-wing ideology, and their test scores are consistently worse than the public schools. I'll keep my kid in his public school.
It really depends on where the private school is located. They can lean heavily either way.
it would depend on the area... then it might be better to go public or private
I would, but I would choose an American school
American private schools aren’t like that. That’s why I wouldn’t choose a Swiss school.
I am paying to have my 3 children homeschooled in 3 of 4 subjects I will teach the 4th. In addition they will be free to choose any skills they want to learn and I will make sure they have the classes
Abso-fuckin-lutely. Took a walk through of my old elementary school and most of the classrooms have pride flags. Told me everything I needed to know. Not about to place my children in a room with a pervert
It would depend on where we live. In my area we have pretty good public schools. But if it was a a different area where the public schools weren't as good, I'd aim for private
Absolutely. I certainly wouldn't want them in an American public school.
If I had kids I'd homeschool them. I don't want any kids though.
I don't want to have to clean up messes, I hate bad smells, I don't want to suffer from irreplacable property damage to my stuff, I don't want to lose any sleep, I don't want a reduction to my free time, and I don't want to be in charge of anyone, pay for anyone else, or worry about anyone else doing stupid things.
There is also the possibility that they will be nothing like me and we won't get along, and normally I just shut those people out of my life, but you can't do that with your own child
Yes , I certainly would if I could afford , my kids did attend private schools but not super expensive ones , I could pay and I did.
If I ever had children I would send them to a local private school.
No, unless it was a school which wasn't elitist and took poor kids.
Some private schools take poor kids.
Most Helpful Opinions