Is this movie poster sexual in any way?

[DubiousIntentions]

Why were things in the 50's and 60's not censored like they are today?

A little sexual

No, nothing sexual at all

dude, that is so blatant

Your comment

[DryGermanGuy]

That film is a James Bond spoof, so obviously they had to take it over the top.

I remember that film because it had an extreme risqué intro sequence with dancer Cyd Charisse ripping her dress open. Some film prints are here longer than others... ;-)

[Havthrills]

Spoof or not, James Bond was very sexual. Octopussy as one movie with Pussy Galore in another James Bond.

[DubiousIntentions]

@Havthrills True, that name. . .

[DryGermanGuy]

@Havthrills
Uhm, yeah, obviously Bond films are overtly sexual, that’s why I mentioned a spoof needs to be even more over the top.

[ohsheeT]

They were it's when everything started getting uncensored that's why we're at where we're at right now I'll never forget we got a TV and I forget the question that I asked my dad but he told me that there wouldn't be cuss words because we had sensors and look at it today look where we are today he told me the TV was going to change the world and that it did

[suzzieQ]

I don't see the men running around in underwear...

[JohnK123]

Couldn’t it be bikinis?

[Fireguy17]

that is about the most they could do back then without getting in trouble with the censors.

[exitseven]

The gun seems to be a phallus. That was really racy in the 60s I bet.

[MCheetah]

Half naked women are at least a little sexual.

[DubiousIntentions]

That is all you see?

[MCheetah]

I mean, I see the gun-as-a-dick double entendre but that's a huge stretch. I doubt most people who don't already have dirty minds, would be thinking it.

[DubiousIntentions]

That is why they were able to do it. I'm thinking back then "Shoots the works" was like "Shoots his wad"

[NathanDavis]

I am quite sure that there is a lot "worse" today... lol

[DubiousIntentions]

OK, which one of you didn't vote?

[NathanDavis]

I do make a differentiation between sexual... and suggestive

[NathanDavis]

@dubiousintentions is this one suggestive or offensive?

[DubiousIntentions]

Anything with her is offensive.

[NathanDavis]

lmfao...

that was hilarious...

[Havthrills]

Back then, people really didn't care or see it that way. Now, everyone is so picky they try to find what's wrong in every situation.

[Makeushiver]

Maybe in a goofy early to mid sixties way. Now your pic...

[loveslongnails]

It would be dubbed as sexist today more so than sexual.

[Dinosaursandanime65]

Because people then weren’t a horde of p*ssies, respectfully

[panamared1]

they were censored, but differently, they could get away with this, but a lot less nudity than today

[Reddy4it]

C…so blatant…phallic imagery

[Nazgol]

Definitely sexual!

[HasegawaHaruko]

Yes so clearly ha ha...

[Jouth]

penis gun

[DubiousIntentions]

Looks like it to me.

[Jouth]

yeah that's what I'm sayin'.

But what's your take?

Do you like penis gun?

[JohnK123]

It’s people in bikinis that’s not sexual

[DubiousIntentions]

That is all you notice?

[DubiousIntentions]

Bikinis or underwear? How about the gen (penis?) with a girl rubbing it, and "Shoots the works" meaning "Shoots his wad"? But I guess what everyone sees is probably different.

[Wise4myage]

Yes, a wee bit.

[Guardian45]

No, just STOOPID! LOL! Dean Martin!😂🤣🤪

[Vendela]

Lmfao 🤣🤣🤣

[Chaser3232]

Suggestive!

[Lee1515]

yes i do

[MrTaboo]

Bring it back