



Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 



I have a couple that come to mind.
The first is Judith Slaying Holofernes by Artemesia Gentileschi. The image itself is messy, uncomfortable but ultimately strong. This depiction of the biblical story is great, but it’s even greater when you compare the image specifically painted by a woman compared to those made by men. The same scene painted by Michael Caravaggio depicts something entirely different. Caravaggio depicts Judith as reluctant, led by an elderly, malicious-seeming elderly lady in waiting, Judith shows disgust at her own actions as blood spills from a man whose neck she is slowly sawing through. Gentileschi does not show this, her Judith is determined, strong, actively fighting a man for his life while helped by a lady in waiting of a similar age, both of them holding him down in a violent, dynamic scene where Judith feels no remorse, only determination in slaying this evil and knowing the cost is worth it. Her work is a statement of the strength of women that men so often underestimate.
The other is Stánczyck by Jan Matejko. It’s a portrait of a well-known jester of the same name who served 3 different Polish kings. You would think, such an entertaining position, the portrait of such a man would also depict the laughter he brings but it’s staunchly the opposite. He sits in a chair, slouched, quiet, all while a party continues on without him just around the corner. The context of the scene is important, you see a folded piece of paper lying on the side. It’s a letter informing him of the Muscovites overtaking Smolensk in 1514. He seems to be the only one concerned, his anxiety clear in his expression, trying to determine what will become of him, his loved ones, his family. He is a royal jester, serving in the court of a king, he is the only man able to critique him openly, the only man in the room more powerful than any from his home town. His influence as royal jester only extends so far and he knows this, but in this moment you see him recognize his powerlessness, the entertainment of the hour in a room full of people with much more power and influence than he will ever have, people he still has to go and serve whenever this quiet moment of quiet, fearful contemplation ends.
I actually love so so so many paintings and I don't remember the name of most of them. The ones I can remember right now are from Edmund Leighton


I love dreamy romantic paintings like these and I also like the typical 'disturbing' ones but I can't remember any of their names for now.

Yeah, this one. When I was researching my Guadeloupe trip, I found an art museum and saw a picture of this painting on Google Maps and I just HAD to see it. She's so beautiful and looks so REAL.
Okay good. I don't see so weird now
It was a real nice painting of a woman that’s very beautiful with a bird on her shoulders
I didn’t take the other picture yet. It’s not hanging on the wall. But meanwhile, here’s a picture of my mom‘s French, impressionist painting, mother and daughter. I had to turn the picture side ways because it sits on the tile floor On its side.
https://postimg.cc/sv4JFwD4
“Girl with a Pearl Earring” by Vermeer always lives in my head rent‑free 🎨✨
The softness of the light, that deep blue and yellow contrast, and especially her gaze feel almost cinematic, like Vermeer paused a movie frame. It’s intimate but mysterious, very minimalist yet emotionally intense. Every time I see it, I imagine a different story behind that look, which never gets old 💙
Opinion
7Opinion
The Garden of Earthly Delights by Hieronymus Bosch.
It's not the most family-friendly painting around so I'm not going to showcase it lol. It left a mark because I view the right part as proto-surrealism, centuries before the revolt against traditional themes, or against realistic painting.
Note: Wikimedia commons has a super heavy 170mb jpg file for that painting, it's a very nice file to have given the intricacy of the scenery
I bought a starving artist's painting on a street corner many years ago for US$25. It's a mountain lake scene. For many years, it hung in my family room. Now it hangs in my home office. It brings back memories of the good times my family had with that painting on the wall.
It's in my profile... and an oversize canvas print is hanging down my stairway.
It is whatever you see in it. The viewer is a part of the art. That's what i like about it.
This one is cool: Triumph of the Amazons by Claude Déruet:
couldn't agree more
it is very cool
I'm glad you like it :)
I always liked this classic The Death of Socrates by Jacques-Louise David

It tells a story with just this visual.

Well lets see i own this Carlo of Hollywood painting and it is currently for sale. It has beautiful red orange yellow shades and the way the soldiers look so different up close as opposed to further away.
Yeah, I've always liked this one:

The apple blocking your view suggests there is always something hidden.
A Few Happy Trees... by Bob Ross
I am way more into the craft, than the art... if that makes sense
so... that's why watching Bob Ross actually work on a painting (or anyone for that matter) it's just so much more fascinating for me... (two of my best, good friends... are painters themselves, by passion, not by trade though) but when I see works of art, already finished, well... great, but to me is just not the same to see a finished art project, than... watching the project come to life and be
this is of course, rare to witness and many times impossible, but anyway
how about artwork coming back to life... I'm fascinated by those as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUpELXPBSMY
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions