I see when young people have sex and have a baby, the girl gets to keep it and get child support but the boy has to pay and has no child.
So who has it worse?
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News I see when young people have sex and have a baby, the girl gets to keep it and get child support but the boy has to pay and has no child.
So who has it worse?
My strong opinion is: The biggest loser is the child.
It really doesn't matter what the argument is for or against the father or mother. The child loses a proper family it deserves to grow healthily and being loved by both parents.
Hence guys and girls, before you fuck around, think of what the fuck you're doing. And the responsibilities that comes with it.
Think of everything that you'll present to the family court: custody, support, continuing of education, legal fees, etc. And the emotional damages.
Then fuck, if you both are OK with that.
To conclude, the child is innocent. It shouldn't bear any burden created by the parents apparent lack of responsibility.
And ignore impact on boys? Who cares the fucker? He should had think of it much much earlier before his first fuck.
Think of the impact on the child. Maybe by doing so, there would be less social problems
It's how the world is. The Government doesn't care about Men just women and children. It's also in our DNA. The problems of women are taken more seriously than men. In case of a fire, they save the kids and women first whilst the men burn. We saw Titanic too women and kids first.
The child doesn't even have to be the man's. Women can put any name on the birth certificate and that man must pay up. A man in America paid child support for 16 years at year 4 he tried to get off it, the government said no.
So because he must contribute financially to the child he helped create, he has it worse? Not the person who carried, birthed and cares for the kid? I’m sorry but if the guy isn’t going to help in any other aspect, the least he should have to do is help finance the kid.
He has it worse cause he loses the kid
What would be the event that he’s losing the kid?
Child support? Any child brought into this world, or person who chooses to have children, shouldn't need that.
Opinion
9Opinion
Because you know, materialistically, they can always leave and ignore that responsability. So we ignore that they may suffer because they have the ability to be mean, at the same time you judge them for doing that so hard that they don't (most times) but then if they don't aren't they being missjudged for having the ability to do something they may not want to do.
This doesn't apply to men who were minors at the time.
Crazily enough it does. The reason why is because gender roles have been establishing themselves for millenia. Men are men as little as 3, they already have a different identity from a 3 year old girl, it's suble but its there :)
The boy has it worse most girls treat boys like they just don't matter. I see many girls treat boys like that in school and when they try to defend themselves everyone believes the girl.
It's not ignoring anything. Men have to take care of their childern financially. It's just how nature made us
Guys should take care of it but they technically aren’t forced to physically unless through child support even then they pay for it but don’t actually do any of the responsibilities.
That itself is a responsibility.
Plus they don't get to see the kid
I think it's worse for the boy if the young people are minors and they have a kid with a pedo.
Its hard for a single mother financially. So that's why the fathers pay child support to help. If he was smart he'd ask for shared custody. Then he can see the child.
True! I expect there to be a court sanctioned “male abortion” that permanently and irreversibly deletes a male’s right to a child. Once abortion is back up if enough Libs vote this time. Gals? (Snaps) Gals?
Its because goverments presume the male co-hurst the female into having unprotective sex hince why in a lot of media when a girl gets knocked up they presume a guy forced her
That depends on a case by case basis. Generally-teen girls receive most of the support, but I have teen fathers trying to be responsible to and participate as well.
Not every female is a good mother, and not every father is a bad father I’ve got custody of my son she didn’t really want him anyways
The woman has it worse. Because of male oppression she has to give up her career and be at home with the kids.
That's not that bad.
She still gets to keep her kid
Yeah the man should've kept it in his pants then.
You can't blame everything on the man. It's her body, she wanted it
@Anonymous What are you, a white knight? Male oppression? She can still get a job if she wants to, albeit it's not easy due to financial and protection of your child constraints. Moreover, having sex was BOTH the girl's and boy's choice (barring rape). Parental rights are also dictated by what jurisdiction/state you're in (barring a custody battle). Here in FL, last I checked, if a child is born out of wedlock, the mother automatically gets 100% custody - I still think it's a shitty thing to do is to bring a child into the world and not be there for them wedlock or not, but alas, we live in the real world.
Ask Shane Seyer!
You can also add your opinion below!