There's attractive and unattractive males and females when it comes to humans alike. I think for the most part females are the more beautiful of the sexes. They are more sexualized and have more beautiful features (to us). Men are hairy, often go bald and strangely shaped a lot of the time. Even when males are attractive, they have a lot of feminine features. Not to the point of being androgenous, but more on the feminine side nontheless..
It would definitely be more fair, if women didn't have to always have to please men with their looks. I don't see men putting half as much energy in to this, and it does seem extremely exist!!
In the human species clearly it is the female who pays more attention to her appearance, dresses in a more advertising fashion (in both color, flashiness and exposure and accentuation of her body parts), and adorns herself with more flashy accessories to attract male attention. And it works. So I think this is pretty clearly what nature intended.
Well to start "beautiful" is subjective and animals by nature are ugly, they are animals lol.
Women naturally should be better looking than man because most men are visually sexually turned on by a woman's physical appearance and beauty while most women are sexually turned on by a man's personality rather than his physical looks.
Disagree. No doubt women like good looking men and that they are visual creatures as well but it's not equal to men.
A handsome man that's a lame with zero confidence and a dork will not have a advantage over a man that has a high confidence and a strong demeanor though he may be average or subpar in physical looks.
A woman at least not the immense majority would not be turned on by such men.
A woman on the other hand can lack confidence and be a bit dorky but if she's physically appealing the man would be turned on by her though her personality sucks a bit.
Nah women are just more picky about who they actually get with but visually are still attracted without personality/emotional connection being a factor. It's that men have been taught that they are allowed to see women as objects just to view for their sexual pleasure. If women did that we would be shamed so it's not something we are open about.
I think a lot of this is actually cultural. There have been times in history when the men are considered pretty, and certainly some subcultures the guys do primp and prim.
I see your point with the cosmetics and other artificial enhancements, not sure how that got flipped. But naturally, males have beards, similar to a lion's mane. So we flipped it around for whatever reason.
Men are beautiful. Thatโs why many women paint their faces with ridiculous amounts of cosmetics. With the diet of entirely fruits, the face will practically glow, although thatโs not about genderism.
Some species are pair bonding and others are not. In the later girls just go after good genes. A peacocks tail is a handicap that advertises his good genes. In pair bonding species male beauty is not so important.
with humans its the opposite. like fun fact scientifically there's actually more pretty girls than pretty guys for evolutionary reasons. so we the cute ones here
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
61Opinion
There's attractive and unattractive males and females when it comes to humans alike. I think for the most part females are the more beautiful of the sexes. They are more sexualized and have more beautiful features (to us). Men are hairy, often go bald and strangely shaped a lot of the time. Even when males are attractive, they have a lot of feminine features. Not to the point of being androgenous, but more on the feminine side nontheless..
It would definitely be more fair, if women didn't have to always have to please men with their looks.
I don't see men putting half as much energy in to this, and it does seem extremely exist!!
A lot of it is for protection. Like Cardinals. Female is brown and male is red.
True but it's also for mating. The cardinals are my fav always feeding them
Nice.
In my case, its my AMAZING LARGER THAN LIFE PERSONALITY and something you CAN'T see publicly!
Lol it's your inner peacock
Riiiight!
In the human species clearly it is the female who pays more attention to her appearance, dresses in a more advertising fashion (in both color, flashiness and exposure and accentuation of her body parts), and adorns herself with more flashy accessories to attract male attention. And it works. So I think this is pretty clearly what nature intended.
Well to start "beautiful" is subjective and animals by nature are ugly, they are animals lol.
Women naturally should be better looking than man because most men are visually sexually turned on by a woman's physical appearance and beauty while most women are sexually turned on by a man's personality rather than his physical looks.
It's a myth that men are more visual. Men and women are equal when it comes to getting turned on visually
Disagree. No doubt women like good looking men and that they are visual creatures as well but it's not equal to men.
A handsome man that's a lame with zero confidence and a dork will not have a advantage over a man that has a high confidence and a strong demeanor though he may be average or subpar in physical looks.
A woman at least not the immense majority would not be turned on by such men.
A woman on the other hand can lack confidence and be a bit dorky but if she's physically appealing the man would be turned on by her though her personality sucks a bit.
Nah women are just more picky about who they actually get with but visually are still attracted without personality/emotional connection being a factor.
It's that men have been taught that they are allowed to see women as objects just to view for their sexual pleasure. If women did that we would be shamed so it's not something we are open about.
Apple, as a straight guy I've never thought of women as dull brown peacocks. I think women are much aesthetically pleasing than men.
🍎
* much more
No; but then, I'm a straight guy, so I'm far from unbiased. I'm curious to hear what the gay guys and bi folks have to say.
I think a lot of this is actually cultural. There have been times in history when the men are considered pretty, and certainly some subcultures the guys do primp and prim.
I see your point with the cosmetics and other artificial enhancements, not sure how that got flipped. But naturally, males have beards, similar to a lion's mane. So we flipped it around for whatever reason.
Men are beautiful. Thatโs why many women paint their faces with ridiculous amounts of cosmetics. With the diet of entirely fruits, the face will practically glow, although thatโs not about genderism.
Nah ur beautiful without any make up:) also let me babysit ur kidssss ahha
Awh thanks! And yes I need help lol
Lmao u never check ur dms anymore so likeeeee
I wanna help ofcccc
Check ur dmsss so I can give u my numberrrr lol to help and coordinate
Some men are (*cough cough* Harry Styles *cough cough*).
Oh now I get it and it made to oh 👀👀😮 oh my 😳😳😋 to myself 👍👍
Typo: made me *go (not to) oh. Darn app delay with typing fingers. Lol. ๐
Some species are pair bonding and others are not. In the later girls just go after good genes. A peacocks tail is a handicap that advertises his good genes. In pair bonding species male beauty is not so important.
You decide... women wear makeup go make themselves look beautiful. Men don't.
@AviatorTom
I beg to differ. Right now there are so many guys wearing makeup. That's the new in thing. And I saw Brad Pitt on TV wearing a skirt.
I would say men and women are roughly even but women are more socially pressured to fuss over their looks so women are the beautiful ones.
Yes male are beautiful to pull females attention
Both men and women can be beautiful or ugly miss apples, it depends...
with humans its the opposite. like fun fact scientifically there's actually more pretty girls than pretty guys for evolutionary reasons. so we the cute ones here