
The building is on fire! Do you save 5 strangers, or 1 sibling? ?🏢🔥🚒🆘🤷?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
A lot of sick, twisted people on this message board; willing to kill five persons just to save one person. One person gets to graduate college, marry, have kids, grow old, but five times as many were denied this life because some greedy sicko felt it necessary to save someone he\she knows, as if knowledge of this person somehow makes him over five times as valuable as a human versus five persons she doesn't know. Sick!
i completely disagree with you, iβm not sure if you have ur own sibling or not but this completely changes it. you grow up with them and have a special bond, at the end of the day iβm not going to lose a loved one over 5 people iβve never met! itβs not greedy at all, itβs when you have a relationship with someone it completely changes it. and iβm not sure if any of my family could forgive me for not saving my own blood
Quality over quantity.
Well if I could only save one it would be my sibling as we would have a stronger bond which matters to me most. Although I know this is kind of escaping the question a bit but if this was a possibility I would save the 5 strangers as if the sibling was trapped in a hard place then the 6 people would be better than none people trying to help. But again the sibling if it was just one!
If I even have to die trying no sibling of mine is left behind if I have the chance to save them. I'm the eldest daughter and the thought of choosing complete strangers over my sibling will never be my call. I would be terribly sorry but blood is thicker.
Blood is thivker than water im afraid. But no lie, my sod and i would try as heck to help them once she's secured. Especially if the strangers were kids.
My sis and i would*
Opinion
38Opinion
Well, I don't have siblings... so strangers it is then!
Still though, think about it. If you ask everyone that question and everyone except those with siblings said save 5 strangers, everyone would be saved if you think about it...
First my sibling and if I am up to it try to save the others. You make it seem like if I want to save my sibling I can not try to save any if the strangers and if I dave any of the strangers first I can not try to save my sibling. Its either that or I let them all die.
Do i know where the strangers are? How can i save 5 people in the same time it would take me to save 1 sibling?
Is my sibling super fat or slow or something? If so i want to change my vote to the 5 strangers.
Save 5 strangers who could be anyone and deal with trauma of letting your own close relative die?
I pretty sure even in that situation, Iβd be too focused on saving my loved ones over anything else. Once thatβs done, Iβll go for the rest.
Sibling unless the strangers are small helpless children that are less able to get out on their own than my sibling. I'm helping whoever I can, I'll deal with a little smoke inhalation.
Depends
if the five strangers were kids and the one sibling is an adult, I would TRY to get one kid and one adult
The people who will save 5 strangers must really hate their siblings and i won't be surprised if they started the fire on purpose to burn their sibling away lmao
Depends if itβs my from my moms side siblings tbh Iβm saving those 5 strangers because there honestly shitty as fuck, if it was my siblings on my dads side though no hesitation I will save them.
Sibling. I have two nephews and the thought of them growing up without a dad is too much. Sure the other people could have family too, but family is family. That's not to say once my sibling was out I wouldn't try for the others, but fam first.
I'd save all of them. I know the choice is between two but I'd try everything I can to save all of them, even if it costs me my life.
But I can't just abandon innocent people like that without even trying.
If strangers where little kids, I would save them first, if they are grown ass adults, they can take care of themselves, I'm saving my sibling
I save my brother, is it a selfish decisions, yeah probably, i don't care though me and my brother are the closest of friends ill always choose that.
One sibling. If i didn't know they existed before, i doubt iβll know about them after. Rip strangers 🙏
Most people would save the person they are closer too duh
It takes a special kind of human to look at the bigger picture and save more people as opposed to one hahaha
I'm stuck between one sibling or get the hell out of there
I guess I'd save my little brother
Why would I save 5 people I don't know?
Why would I try to save 5 people?
I'm not Superman saving one life is doable, but 5 that's borderline moronic.
my sibling. i don't owe strangers anything. i don't know them and i don't care much for them so if it's 5 vs my sibling, it's my sibling. could be 100 and it would still be my sibling.
I'd prioritize my sibling and then try to rescue as many strangers as I can after.
I'd be worried about people who assign equal value to all human lives.
If I could, I'd save as many as I can but I'll start off with family first.
I straight up don't care about random strangers. I'll get my sis and dip
I only have one brother. If I can, heβs getting out alive
I'm sorry but it would be my sibling first . Then I would help other people if I can
Hear me out First. I'll save my sibling first and I'll try to save as many as possible strangers too.
I'd chose a sibling, no way can my chair go fast enough to get to 5 strangers.
Save myself. Society doesn't give a donkeys tail about me, except when they want my money. So, why should I care about someone else?
I'll try to save the building?
If that saves my brother too, this can be tolerated :D
I guess, I'll go for the easiest case/cases first. Next: see who's left.
I'd save my sister. Blood is blood 😂 sorry 5 strangers, you're on your own
Oh yawn.
Take your fucking retarded ethics home work some where else.
Of course I'm gonna save my sibling!!
Leave. Fuck strangers and I have no siblings
5 strangers. I don't have any siblings.
I would choose my brother.
One sibling. Sorry. But family comes first for me.
Strangers. Fuck my sister.
Depends on the quality of the strangers.
I would save my sis
πππ
Save the youngest sibling.
Make it interesting... say 5 babies or a sibling.
Sibling... the world is overpopulated
My sibling fuck the stranger!
You save your own blood its automatic
screw that Im saving all 6 people!!!
The people I know first.
Sibling
The only person I'm saving is myself
My fam first then everyone else
I would choose saving the most life over 1
I put the fire out and save them all
This happens to me so much!
#BLM
#HoustonTexas
Ill get out i have no siblings
I'd save 5 strangers.
As many as i can,
Being an only child strangers.
Family. The blood of the covenant and all that
Sibling of course.
My siblings
My sibling.
My brother, always.
1 sibling
My siblings all have kids, so i'd want them to survive
I have no siblings
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions