Girls, are disembodied male gentalia enough for women and is the rest of the male body obsolete to continue the civilisation?

[Fellatrix]

Updates

1 y

It is going to sound a bit morbid so please bear with me. I had a conversation with a woman who studies her last year on her campus. She wants to be a doctor. She told me that if all women castrated men and threw away their genitalia and just kept the body, the world would go down unless there are sperm banks. But if women threw away the male body and kept their penis and testicles, women would be reproducing anyway. She told me this can’t be the other way round. A whole woman’s body is needed.

Updates

1 y

Please I want to hear your brutal honest answer, if you were to use your own sense without too much research, do you think this is true? No feelings, but just please be honest. Is only the male genitalia needed while a woman’s body is necessary?

I do think women are superior though because studies show it and there are many books written about the natural superiority of women like “Female genetic superiority”, etc.

[SueShe]

First experiences done reveal that in theory, men and their sperm are no longer needed to reproduce a human being. Females are still needed (for the time being) but the only "problem" (is it really a problem) is that the clones are only female and not male.

Thus, in theory again, you no longer need men nor their genitals to keep humanity alive and growing. The question is now whether men want to be sacrificed?

I am sure that the one or the other will oppose as well as a few women also. As for me, since I don't fornicate, this would not impact me.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

She’s just talking about how sperm production is limited to male genitalia whereas egg production requires multiple organs beyond the ovaries and uterus to function. That’s all.