Why?
Go anon if you have too.
forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=5481953
I don't think you can make generalizations that everyone is lying or not lying. Some are, some aren't.
Lets look at science. From the point the female body reaches the age where they can conceive a child (has her period) until menopause she is scientifically able to reproduce and as nature would have it those years tend to be the most attractive to the opposite sex.
So generally from 14 - 50 or so. Now the high point of those years from a hormone and looks perspective is around 18-30 or so.
Now before people freak out - I'm not saying that 30+ are not attractive etc - I'm saying' the MOST attractive years'.
Now some girls become 'womanly attractive' earlier than others. I've seen 15 year olds that I'd swear are 20 and 18 year olds I thought were 13.
Personally I am NOT attracted to girls who look young or have a baby look to them. I prefer some level of maturity. At my age - what level of beauty and maturity would I date/pursue - 23/24 and up at least. What level is attractive? College age and up no doubt. (19+). But while I can look at a 19/20 year old and think she looks attractive - I would not pursue it for the maturity factor. When I was college age - but of course I would pursue it.
However from a physical level woman's bodies are best from about 17 to 24. Lean, nice skin, curves etc. It is the peak attractiveness. From an overall attractiveness though - I prefer more maturity to a woman and someone closer to my age. Few girls are comfortable as comforatable with their sexuality as I would like until they pass 25 so... thats my new target.
Long winded response but again - I hate the generalizations as 'everyone' this or that. People are individuals. If you say 'do you think the majority... does this or that' then its a different discussion.
This is a very well rounded answer. Thanks
Well done! 👍😄
If a female has a developed woman's body... she will be attractive to guys of ALL ages.
Us guys just don't act on that attraction, because of 1) the law, and 2) social persecution.
Even if she has a child's face?
And even if she still plays with dolls?
Back in the caveman days, females would mate as soon as they were able to conceive children (aka, when she starts menstruating).
Socialization has changed the perception of the masses, mainly because a modern, capitalist, first-world society can't function optimally with 13 year olds having children!
When little girls have babies.. They usually die of birth problems. Because even though they are old enough to have babies.. Their bodies aren't ready.
That sounds selfish
Well.. I never shared and I still don't care. And none of the people in my class do either.
I think the number one reason guys shouldn't act on it is because its wrong...
Thankyou. This guy couldn't have said it any better.
I have come to like this answer.
Yeah. I cry about everything ;_;
I think that if girls under 18 looks mature enough, most guys will be attracted to them (there are also guys who are only attracted by much older woman). Some girls look older and some look younger (people guess that i'm 18-20, but i'm a few days shy of 25) so it can be hard to judge sometime. For example, my best friend was at a time 16 and he could pass for a 18-19 year old (I have been seen as his little sister even though i'm a year olden than him).
18-20 year old guys are in the gray zone due to that they are not that old, but at least 13-14 year old girls should be to young for them).
For me guys need to be at least 2 years younger to 4 years older for me to be attracted to them (younger or older than that doesn't do a thing for me).
I feel the same way. But not quite. I think 18 is too old for 13!
Ofcourse a 13 year old and a 18 year old should not be together. It was more like the 15-16 area which i meant.
I'd say it depends on how she looks and I wouldn't surprised if they did. If she looks like a woman then that's normal. Brooke Shields was 14 in the blue lagoon
cineplex.media.baselineresearch.com/.../...ull.jpg
scstylecaster.files.wordpress.com/.../...24431.jpg
And while she could have more womanly features, she also doesn't look like a child. Which doesn't mean it's ok to have sex with a 13 year old that looks mature. We have statutory rape laws for a reason
She looks so pretty in the last picture.
Maybe that's why some guys find younger girls who look older attractive
Jailbait! lolol girls 13-23 should focus on their self-growth, who cares if the guys are attracted to the age or not? They will fuck a pocket pussy if they have to, dont plan around the guys ideals. Uniqueness is best and you can only achieve that by focusing on yourself.
Interesting and very true
Well said.
People treat you like you treat you
@crazyincalifornia
Exactly!!
I love the pocket pussy description
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Opinion
48Opinion
To be honest, I am seriously starting to believe it. It is quite revolting.
I know. And since I'm 13-14 the answers literally are making me want to vomit
I know how you feel. I cried all day when this man as old as my dad tried to talk to me
I think many don't want to believe it because of social pressures but even 13 year old girls will have the necessary sexual triggers for a guy. From an evolutionary perspective it makes perfect sense to be attracted to anyone capable of reproduction. I read that 12-15 year old girls had the highest chance of surviving childbirth and having the child survive as well, maybe it was one or the other or both I don't remember. So I accept that guys can be attracted to teenage girls.
Studies show it can be damaging to have sex underage (go figure) but that most people tend to have the necessary mental framework to handle sex at 16 or be able to make a decision whether they want to or not. That's why the laws often have the age of consent around 16. Most guys will respect that out of moral decency if they see attractive young teens, but mostly they are little idiots at that age and it's annoying as fuq so they aren't attracted to the personality anyway.
I've seen on a number of occasions guys look at a picture and go oh she's cute/hot or something to that effect and the be told she's under 18 or under 16 and then go eww gross. Clearly modern guys don't like the idea of girls being underage but it's perfectly possible for a 13 year old to be attractive.
Girls don't just magically become attractive overnight when they hit 16 or the age of consent for wherever they happen to live. Guy's attraction isn't as fluid as girls, it forms over puberty and then the sexual cues are mostly set. Even if we say girls are most attractive in late teens to mid twenties, it stands to reason that they will be attractive to some extent on the younger and older sides of that age range.
Lastly, pedos go for preteens and below, not teens, and if they don't hurt anyone then I'm not going to hate them and bash them like everyone else. Pedo ≠ rapist/molester. There are groups for self-admitted pedophiles that don't intend to hurt children, I won't hate when they being responsible.
I think you can say someone is attractive but its whether you act on it is where the problem begins. And it depends on the context of why you're saying it.
I personally wouldn't go near any girls that age and even when i was younger i still had a massive problem with it. Girls at that age of 13/16 are still developing and aren't the finished article. 17 year olds though still absolutely no chance. id even put them in the developing stage. most are trying to figure themselves out and won't really know what they want from life.
For me dating underage girls is wrong. Simple as that
This is what I think every man should think like
the guys on miscers. wow hahaa. i never log onto that forum anymore cause of the people lol.
17 is understandable if the region is legal. but 13 pfft bahahaa. how is "underdevelopment" in any way sexy?
I know, the things some of these men are saying are very pedo ish
It's not that simple. That's the age we start coming into our own sexuality, those are the first girls we're attracted to.
So in a purely physical, primal sense we never stop being attracted to teenage girls. It's fertility embodied.
But as an adult, teenage girls are insufferable. They're immature, insecure, inexperienced (both sexually and socially). So even though they're physically attractive, I'd never want to get involved with one. They have so little to offer compared to a grown adult woman.
There's a difference with being attracted to someone, and thinking they're attractive. I do see some 13-14 y/o girls that I think they are attractive, but I don't feel any attraction to them.
As a 19 y/o guy I do feel some attraction to some 17 y/o girls though, but because the age gap is not too big.
Thats understandable
I also forgot to add, that makeup can be misleading. I've seen 14 y/o girls with makeup that look like they're in their 20's, so I can understand why some men can get confused. Hell, I've been in that situation, where I feel attraction to what I think is an 18 y/o girl, and when I'm told she's 13 I wanted to vomit xD
Hahahaha LOOOL that was funny
16 year olds are mature enough for me to consider them physically attractive, although too young to date. 13 year olds? No. Younger? Sick. 16 seems to be the number, and I noticed this can vary based on race/genetics. In my experience, Latinas are primed in the 15-21 range. I'm just stating my observations and maybe this could lead to an interesting discussion amongst biologists.
Anyways, that's just me.
Yes they are. Even though I find Latinas of all ages beautiful
16 is the legal AOC in a good portion of the US and most of Europe (sometimes 15 in Europe). Most men ARE attracted to women 15-19, this is known as Ephebophilia. Some guys won't admit it or just aren't consciously aware. It's actually completely normal, since girls of that age have gone through puberty and are sexually mature enough (breeding age). Humans used to have kids at 15-19 not too long ago.
13-14 is certianly much more iffy. Some girls are certianly sexually developed by then but can still be considered children, whereas 15 is considered the age of womanhood in many cultures (16 here in the US).
I think as long as a guy doesn't do anything illegal, it's okay.
I'm only 20 but I find it really hard to be attracted to anyone evenslightly younger than me. My girlfreind is only 9 months younger than me and it was hard for me to get passed. I think I just have a real hang up around pedophilla that stops me from having those kinds of feelings. Also I've always been into women in there late 20s and older since I was a liitle boy. However beyond myself I don't think it matters if you're attracted to people and animals who can't give consent as long as you don't act on that attraction. Feelings you can't help, but you are always in control of ypur actions and victimizing a child in that way ks one of the worst things you can do.
I agree
Yea I agree it's more of a legal thing and morally wrong in 2015, but if you look at humans from a scientific perspective as long as you hit puberty anything goes since we live for reproduction and to sustain human life
The law is there to protect younger minds since there innocent but that doesn't mean older people can't be attracted to younger people. Women as well, lots of older women want younger guys
It's normal, youth is valued since humans age
well its normal for a guy to admire beauty
but to be sexually attracted to a girl that is under 16, is just weird
girls aren't even close to being ladies at that point
I can sometimes be attracted to a girl that looks older than she is, for example a really developed 16 year old can pass for 18, but to know the age would be a bit of a turn off
plus i usually find my self attracted to older women, or rather women who are older than me
Well, I wouldn't sleep with a girl under 18. But, whenever I'm out and about, I look at all the nice bodies/asses I see, and I am physically attracted to those girls. I'm pretty sure (aside from the obvious of course) that not every girl I've seen is at least 18.
So, I get the point they're making.
Even with their child like faces?
Some girls just have a baby face, and yeah, some of them probably are actually 15 or 16. But I like what I like (nice body and butt), so if I see a girl with physical features I like, it's only natural that I'll be physically attracted to her.
Guys have in there head an age that looks dateable. I'm old enough now that even most 20 year olds just look too young for me. It's not a legal convention, it's a child. Anyone who can not see that has issues. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact my daughter is 25.
Yeah. I think it has to too with that too. Because people over 45 who have no kids still say they find 18 year olds "sexy as hell"
And when I say stuff like "she's young enough to be your daughter"
They block me.
Lol you went to bodybuilding dot com forum. That is no place for a woman to go to. I repeat do not go there again. I have an account on that site with same name and use to post on their forum. They are heartless men that hate women.
Anyways. Yes I think they are lying. Teenage girls are still attractive yet they should know that they are off limits. Attractiveness has nothing to do with age but simply looks.
Them threads on there are from year 2007, but still why would all them
be so interested in girls age 13-17 makes me wonder why some police
unit to prevent crimes against children hasn't took that down well you
know police departments have Facebook, all you do is contact them
they will investigate also there is well known LAPD detective whose
brought a California Lawyer to justice for committing crimes on a
website called Kupika
*they
I'm not going to report it but I agree.., it's still gross
Kind of
Smh... i don't know why the Moderators of that site haven't took that down?
Those "men" if you want to call them that are sick and disgusting.
I agree
LOL look at how many guys are bummed out at your opinion
They are probably just having a hard time admitting it to themselves
Ha. The amount of crap I give about how upset guys are that being attracted to prepubescent girls is sick is... none. :P
sex, legal age but prob not since id end up hurting her...
i dont know about 13 or 15 yr olds... but legal is 16 here.
i just go by the rule of if i dont like her or see her as a potential gf, i dont try anything. but, to say teenagers can't be physically attractive is bs.
when she is developed, nature is saying she's ready. i do not care about what others think. most are sheep anyway.
Science says that guys would be attracted to youth because of fertility (NOT MINORS), Before it was acceptable since people died at a early age but now it's gross, maybe not 17 but especially 13 for obvious reasons.
I also think that it was gross to marry minors in the past/ ancient times too, sorry for not being specific
Young girls are funny/cute if you are patient with them. They make me laugh... I never had sisters, but I'd image that's what they'd be like...
Patient with them? Can you explain that?
Young girls are like little bottle rockets. They have too much energy and they have bad judgement. I can see how people who lack patients would find them annoying, but once you get to know them they grow on you. They're funny and caring for the most part and make me smile. I don't see them as sexually attractive at that age, more so like a little sister or daughter without the strong loyalty bond that come from being family. They're still fun to be around sometimes though.
Haha that's really cute
I'm 22 and my (soon to be, hopefully - distance and waiting) girlfriend is 17. I really couldn't care about the age gap. Waiting this long and gently palming off other girls interest seems to have paid off, imagine that this could be a long-term deal. :)
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions