Why are MOST guys attracted to conventionally attractive women as opposed to unique beauty? (Page 2)

Question

For example: Most guys would be more attracted to a girl that looks like this: THAN a girl who looks like this:

tartaarsaus · Answer

Well, that's kind of the reason why something such as 'conventional attractiveness' exists. The nature of it is that it is conventionally attractive, so most guys are attracted to

winterfox10 · Answer

Wow, really? I found the brunette more appealing. I think guys find conventional beauty attractive, just because that's what we see idolized when we are growing up.

sunflower569 · Answer

Ik I’m not a guy but I think both are super pretty. Maybe it has something to do with primal instincts. Maybe certain characteristics would aid in survival. Example: guys like boobs because they feed their offspring?

DashboardLight · Answer

It might just be me, but I think guys would actually like the second one more, because A: her looks tell she has more personality than the first one and B: the first one looks faker in the pic than the second one.

WeirdoWerdo · Answer

2nd girl is better stop generalizing what most guys want...

OnlyYouKnowThat · Answer

In my opinion both the women shown as examples here are equally attractive.

PunKin93 · Answer

I don't really see a difference between the two other than hair color really. And makeup.

Anonymous · Answer

Actually the girls u are '' using ''are both '' conventionally attractive'' , but with different coulour '' tones''. As to your question , for the good or for the bad mankind have beauty standards for both men and women , who are universal and in some case timeless. If one girl from Africa , one from Asia and one from Europe see a 6-packed guy they will all think that this guy is handsome.

JackJPershing · Answer

Your question answers itself. The reason it is defined as "conventional beauty" is exactly because most men/people find it most/more attractive.

Logorithim · Answer

I like the second one better. Guys like whatever is more exotic to them.

madgoat · Answer

Many people tend to gravitate to someone equal to themselves, and perhaps fantasise about photoshopped models.

blubblubblub · Answer

er they're both conventionally beautiful actually

Daniel3035 · Answer

Were not were attracted to a girl with a decent heart and personality the problem is you can't differentiate between the two either could be or neither could have those traits. 99% it's neither.

Introvert94 · Answer

These are both bad options. The blond looks like a robot/machine. And the brunette looks like she's crazy. But the brunette is way more attractive than the blond.

cykasenpai · Answer

The second pic has less makeup around the eyes. That's a killer for men.

jessture · Answer

Why are most women only attracted to men taller than them? Hint: biology is the answer to both

AcidT0y · Answer

People don't like it because it's conventionally attractive. It's considered conventionally attractive because people like it.

Anonymous · Answer

I don't see one unique thing about that second girl

katymystery00 · Answer

I honestly think the 2nd girl was much prettier than that first girl. The first girl looked very plasticy and her makeup was caked. She also had a really bad dye job and her hair is probably very brittle. 2nd girl is a natural beauty!

Just_A_Guy2018 · Answer

well shit, I'm not attacked to either, where are the red haired Amazons?

TheNotorious · Answer

The first one is actually ugly blonde girls are overrated

PatKirby · Answer

Jezuz, how much fakeup does the first one need to put on in order to feel good about herself?

fay23 · Answer

What are you talking about? Both girls are conventionally pretty

AynonOMouse · Answer

I don't like the first one's face, and her eyelashes really bother me.

shady1997 · Answer

Thats wrong i prefer the second one and if she was a latina it is more pretty

zagor · Answer

Both are conventionally attractive. If you want to demonstrate unique beauty you need to come up with a new pic.

Aenetoo · Answer

I like short girls with big noses. Not conventional. But neither am I.

StickStickity13 · Answer

Men have a much higher range of what they consider "attractive" than women

JSmuve · Answer

1st chick has more feminine features 2nd chick has more masculine features

Dzokson00 · Answer

I prefer the unique beauty that i find once in a week, not the basic bitch/ porn star makeup looks

bamesjond0069 · Answer

They both look like girls I've dated before. I don't think you know what you are talking about.

James1033 · Answer

I’m attracted to the second one more. You’d probably get a 50/50 split for who guys think is the most attractive out of the two.

valualty · Answer

Same way women are mostly attracted to guys with hair ignoring that up to 40% of men are bald but attractive 😂😂😂

esotericstory · Answer

Its called averagedness, humans have a predisposition to desire averagedness for some reason, although exotic beauties will certainly be appreciated.

Patmedley26 · Answer

Both of them are beautiful honestly... actually the unique beauty may have the edge just my opinion tho

TDMelo · Answer

It will depend on the guys I prefer the second girl far more than the first one, I like unique beauties, and I agree with you in the fact that the first one is much more comum

Anonymous · Answer

They really don't look that much different and neither one of them does it for me.

Fuentes · Answer

2nd girl is average compare to the blonde lol idc what u say

Piteka5 · Answer

Both seem strange to me, I'm more for friendly faces

Krazzymike321 · Answer

Nah, neither of these girls are my "taste"... It's hard to explain without sounding like a jerk...

rickytim · Answer

That's just the way guys are that woman is beautiful. but to me unique beauty is fantastic

CoffeeWC · Answer

Possible reason: it shows that they put effort into their appearance.

Chromekids · Answer

Your high. They are both conventionally hot. Unless you live in Norway or Sweden.

TheFlak38 · Answer

Most guys will be attracted to a girl like that because it is exotic beauty.

jeffybill · Answer

I think that they're both hot, but I really love for gnats with thick and asses

BeyondPlusUltra · Answer

Blonde hair and blue eyes are just nice to look at for most people.

Jonny_Five · Answer

I would choose the second girl, I prefer dark hair & brown eyes.

TsubasaCorrupted · Answer

Those are both considered conventionally attractive.

Anonymous · Answer

I'm not a male lol but I don't care for the look of the top girl. (Just talking about looks here)

Anonymous · Answer

I'm more attracted to darker skinned and darker haired women. They are my looksmatch.

Anonymous · Answer

Not really

Rowlesman · Answer

I for one am more attracted to the second, but most guys choose the first cuz we know what we want and that's decided from our ancestors

cutthroats · Answer

What? They are literally both hot af! I would smashhh both of them

pitzi · Answer

How's the second girl unique?

Anonymous · Answer

there was a study done on this people are most attracted to common face rather then some one who is super attractive

SwagsMcBags · Answer

They're both conventionally attractive... though I'm a fan of neither.

Slim57 · Answer

I'm attracted to whatever I'm attracted to, conventional beauty or unique doesn't matter to me

Thechillguy · Answer

They call it conventional for a reason, because it is what most find beautiful. Obviously

Seppelson · Answer

I am more into the second picture. I don't like blondes

Anonymous · Answer

That's what conventions do: they get to them, and now that's how they think too.

Why are MOST guys attracted to conventionally attractive women as opposed to unique beauty? (Page 2)

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.