"Unique beauty" Lol, unless you live in the freaking Valhalla, the second kind of a woman is going to be far more common than the first one.
0
1 Reply
Asker
+1 y
lol been and lived most the U. S, London, Australia, NZ, most of Europe and Scandinavian countries and can CONFIDENTLY say that girl 1 look (facial features) is BY FAR more common than the brunette
They both look like conventional beauties, the first one is a bit more made up, the second is more natural. People are attracted to whatever is attractive, conventional or not
Both of those are conventionally attractive. But beyond that, the reason that there is even such a thing as conventional attractiveness is that it indicates good genetics. We’ve sexually selected for a certain set of traits that indicate fertility.
Biological issues the first female has a more perfect symetric that the second and it gives her some advantage but... Biological decisions aren't love decisions so the advantage isn't as great when we talk about falling in love.
Wow... that is so false, the second girl it is just more attractive and seems more intelligent too by the look of her eyes so not sure if you chose the pictures really well, couse I could never actually really ever chose the 1st girl from these 2
Disagree. Women dream up this whole idea of facts about what men want that are horribly inaccurate. Women tell women this stuff men don't say this shit. Itd your Cosmo's and whatever fucking magazine that's just trying to sell you shit.
but her unique looks are conventional. There are guys for example who like women who look rougher with tatoos all over, bigger noses, rougher faces. I don't, but they find them sexy, but that's an example of non conventional looks.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
129Opinion
"Unique beauty"
Lol, unless you live in the freaking Valhalla, the second kind of a woman is going to be far more common than the first one.
lol been and lived most the U. S, London, Australia, NZ, most of Europe and Scandinavian countries and can CONFIDENTLY say that girl 1 look (facial features) is BY FAR more common than the brunette
It depends on the guy. It's said that many guys can attracted to women that look similar to their mom
Pause
IM DECEASED
Guys you know what to do 😂
REPORT THAT MFING SHIT
They both look like conventional beauties, the first one is a bit more made up, the second is more natural. People are attracted to whatever is attractive, conventional or not
If anything, Liz Taylor was unconventional and plenty found her beautiful
why are people get attracted to other dysfunctional people and keep trying to fix them.
Why do i know this and keep doing it.
by the way girl 2 is hotter
Both of those are conventionally attractive. But beyond that, the reason that there is even such a thing as conventional attractiveness is that it indicates good genetics. We’ve sexually selected for a certain set of traits that indicate fertility.
If i had to choose... second one looks far better than the first girls general look.
Maybe cause where not blind. Also both girls here are hot so don't get what you mean really.
Because there are biological fundamentals that make women attractive. Evolution might be a bitch, but it is what it is.
Try dat
Tru*
There are exceptions to everything. No matter what you look like, there'll be a guy or guys out there who think that's amazingly hot.
Of course, the same is not true for women. Which kind of sucks for unconventional men.
Biological issues the first female has a more perfect symetric that the second and it gives her some advantage but...
Biological decisions aren't love decisions so the advantage isn't as great when we talk about falling in love.
Wow... that is so false, the second girl it is just more attractive and seems more intelligent too by the look of her eyes so not sure if you chose the pictures really well, couse I could never actually really ever chose the 1st girl from these 2
Disagree. Women dream up this whole idea of facts about what men want that are horribly inaccurate. Women tell women this stuff men don't say this shit. Itd your Cosmo's and whatever fucking magazine that's just trying to sell you shit.
People don't get to choose what they're attracted, and they shouldn't be shamed for it.
they both have the looks as far as I know of conventional beauty.
but her unique looks are conventional. There are guys for example who like women who look rougher with tatoos all over, bigger noses, rougher faces. I don't, but they find them sexy, but that's an example of non conventional looks.
I'm attracted to unconventional beauty, but you aren't showing it here. I'm also attracted to passion, health of mind and body, and big laugh
neither one of those women are an example of unique beauty.. Both are rather conventionally attractive..
Umm what? What in the hell is unique beauty?
Every person is different therefore everyone is unique and beautiful in their own way.
Both of them are conventionally attractive, if your look deviates from both of them there's a good chance you're just not attractive.
Uh, not true
xx
~ Mrs Manson
@MarilynMansonsSlvt truths are overrated
They're conformists
xx
~ Mrs Manson
@MarilynMansonsSlvt 😂😂😂 hey I remember you
Yep.
xx
~ Mrs Manson
For the record I’ll take a naturally beautiful woman over a woman with caked on makeup ANYDAY
Well people in general tend to gravitate towards basic looking people all the time.
damn