While this is a fun question for once, I must correct you on ascribing Turks to be Huns. The Huns were a subgroup of the Mongolian steppes, while the original Turks were called Göktürks hailing from inner Asia. Similar cultures sure, horse nomads both yes, but not the same people and certainly not with the same deeds to their name.
Now as for the question; first you must specify what period of Vikings vs Huns. Being Viking in the famed sense of the word existed from the 8th century to the 11th century and they did evolve somewhat during this time. Are we talking about the disorganized few raiders who started out on Lindisfarne 793 AD, or the Vikings with greatly developed cultures of armaments, battle tactics and reach of influence who controlled Great Britain and fought Saxons in the Battle of Meretun 973 AD? The same goes for the Huns. The few nomads who grazed the steppes early on in their history or the organized armies of Attila invading Eurasia?
Given then that we take the prime of both cultures it can't be said for certain. Both were fierce warrior peoples. Some factors to consider is that the greatest challenge for the Vikings would be the horse archers of the Huns, pinning them down and picking them off. The greatest challenge for the Huns would be the shieldwall of the advancing Vikings capable of deflecting archery tactics, and their berserkers running rampant straight into their lines without fear. The Norse did employ cavalry, but were mainly infantry. Furthermore, the Huns would face a logistic problem in that they must find a suitable campsite to orient themselves in foreign lands, say the Russian steppes and east Europe. They would have to have water nearby for their horses, i. e. rivers. But this would be vulnerable to Viking lightning attacks as the Longboats of the Norse was capable of traversing up river and was part of their transportation network. The Huns strength were their horses, if the Vikings could neutralize that, they would most likely prevail.
Most Helpful Opinions
I'm thinking the Huns with all their cavalry although I'm far from an expert on this subject.
No brainer. Huns or "Turks". @TheTurksLeader... Who depending on what study you consider was a Turkic tribe, seeing as the language of the Mongol Empire was Turkic. And in the reverse some view Turkic people of a Mongolian root
And, since @alexanderanttila knows little about ancient fighting or societies, the Vikings would've been picked off like fleas on a dog.
Why?
They'd have no horses. Vikings predominantly had to steal mounts and the Huns would've protected their mounts like a figurative dragon protects their gold. The Hun horses also would've been fast, fleet of foot, etc. which the Vikings in their lumbering armor & shields would've been disadvantaged against.
As example a group of Hun are riding from the west. The Vikings know of the archers so they set up their shield wall. Good, good. The Hun are coming closer & closer & closer. But rather than waste their arrows they split around that shield wall, turn their mounts, and open fire on the Vikings who are desperately scrambling to get their shield wall turned around in defense.
Like said picked off like fleas on a dog.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
1Opinion
Turks
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions