Stay Behind or Go Ahead?

[Rosexøxø]

Would you rather:

- Be the one who has to stay behind, maybe to look for / or look after survivors, when there is a *massive threat inching closer* by the day, to your ‘safe area/site/ camp,’ and the majority of the group will move ahead to ensure other things are cared for?

OR

- would you rather be the one who has to go ahead alone, and venture to find a ‘safe place,’ while there are *threats all around,* and unpredictable situations outside of the temporary safe zone, where the rest of the group remains, and tries to recover from wounds, or other?

(Some Images Sourced from Google)

Be the ‘Someone has to stay behind’

Be the ‘Someone has to go on ahead’

I could do both

I prefer neither

Other

Updates

1 y

Why or why not

[MisterWack]

Depends on the circumstance, if it were Jurassic Park / Zombie Horror I’d stick to the safe place looking after survivors…

[Rosexøxø]

Interesting and what if it was only safe, say.. for like a few days left and stuff? Then it would no longer be safe or it was a semi-safe area that had a huge risk for being breached?

[MisterWack]

@Rosexøxø If I had a risk of dying either way….
I’d go ahead. Again depends on the risk, stakes, etc.

[Rosexøxø]

😂 okay

[MisterWack]

@Rosexøxø , Great! 🤣👍

[DizzyDesii]

Im sticking with the pack. Gotta keep the bait close

[Rosexøxø]

😂 it’s definitely an option