Questions

Lets say you were online friends for a few years and you were recently accused of wrongdoing online by a person that visited your friends chatroom online that could have really impacted your life but was proven you didn't do it.

Then a few days or weeks later you were in that room but was kicked out of that room by your other friend that is a moderator even though you were there first because that accuser joined. That friend messaged you after being kicked saying they only did it so no trouble would start, but they didn't kick out the accuser that had been hostile to you even before the accusations started.

Then months later not the room owner but the moderator of that room messaged you checking up on you even though you all haven't really spoken to each other much for months after everything, but only a few times.

Would you remain friends with people like this?

Yes or no? VOTE BELOW! 🗳

“All men are trash.”
“Men need to stop killing women.”
“Men need to stop raping women.”

And if you think generalising men like this is wrong, you’re told: only the men who do these things should be offended.

Okay, then:

“Black people need to stop committing crimes.”
“Muslims need to stop being terrorists.”
“Women need to stop being gold diggers.”

Not all Black people.
Not all Muslims.
Not all women.

All valid arguments, apparently—but not when it comes to men. Why are you allowed to say “men need to stop” etc., but can’t say that about anyone or anything else, and then claim that only people who do those things should be offended?

I got device banned from Snapchat supposedly for sexual content , all I have was a shirtless picture of a man and there’s shirtless pics all over the place on there and women promoting their onlyfans and having their boobs out , Snapchat is a hypocritical shithole. I don't know if I can ever sell my phone now, cuz device bans are usually forever.