Um, no, that's not how it works lol. Plenty of guys date women solely because they're hot or physically have something they like and will kick them to the curb when someone else comes along.
You can love a man and still marry him just for his money. There's plenty of guys (and girls) who are not good partners for various reasons: Abusive, cheaters, liars, insensitive. However, people choose to stay with them anyway. Women can find a guy who is no good but still stay for the money. People stay with people they know are no good because they 'have history' or 'love them even though they're completely wrong' and the money can be what tips the scale in the marriage direction.
Shuri I don't know what guys you've dealt with but I can assure you one thing both guys and girls stick around for security yes. But most of all because they're to scared of being alone.
Thing is when a girl dates a guy for money she actually gets something out of it trips , shoes money, she pretty much just hit jackpot
When a guy dates a hot girl what's the benefits umm Have to constantly deal with her being opsesed with herself aka inflated EGOS. she's most likely terrible in bed she's harder to impress due to the attention she gets from Instagram etc. There's not to much benefit to dating a hot girl just for looks. Let me tell you something a guy isint picky. Infact a guy just wants a girl who respects him that's it. problem is to many girls don't want to show any interest and expect the guy to persue them. thats not how it works any long term relationship needs to individuals who will receive and give love.
Some men are attracted to looks but the matter of the fact is that everyone is attracted by looks so you can't judge them for that because both parties are bad.
But if you dating them for money quite simple your a gold digger lmao. You have no interest in the person just wealth instead of earning your own you feed off of others through seduction like Bonnie and Clyde.
Bonnie and Clyde was seduction Bonnie had no love Clyde just attention she wanted.
Who said it's fine? Maybe a feminist hypocrite 😏 Marriage is sacred only if it's done in a chruch or another place where the couple gets the blessing of god to become one and turn into a family...
I'll never marry a girl for her looks, i'll marry her because she loves me and willing to do anything for me...
A woman shouldn't marry a man for his money because marriage came from love and not from money!
Because a lot of hypocrisy exists in society today, but here's the truth: A woman who is with a man for his money is a bitch and a thot. A man who is with a woman for her body is a cad and a louse. Individuals who act this way are reprehensible in every way and guilty of fraud and one of the most dishonourable forms of objectification.
It's acceptable both way just frown upon. If you want to pimp out 1000 women more power to yah. If you want to gold dig and bankrupt 1000 more power to yah. In both situations, no one is truly a victim. People know who they're usually dealing with. And decided not to take action. In situations like those two no one is a victim and no one is an idiot
What on Earth are you blabbing about? Women bitch about men judging them only on their looks at least as much as men bitch about women judging them only on their success or material wealth. To pretend one is more "acceptable" than the other is to be vain, petty, selfish, and daft. You act like "socially accepted" is some designed machine with pre-programmed algorithms, when in reality it is just the similar opinions of individuals who neither attempt to nor care to conspire with one another.
It's not. Its just that women go about it all wrong. If you simply had a standard ie. Only date successful men. Ok thats one thing. And in my opinion as a successful man thats a good standard. I dont want a girl who likes bums. Eww no thanks. But men who want pretty girls keep it as a standard. Ie i will not date fat girls period. What y'all do is date bums and then latch on to a rich guy. Thats disgusting and literally just trashy behavior.
You could argue that how someone looks is part of them i guess.
I dont think it is socially acceptable though we're not in the days of 'trophy wives' unless we are talking about the top earners. Then you have people marrying for looks to people marrying for money and... well they deserve each other.
It was socially acceptable to marry men for their money up until the sexual (gender) revolution of the sixties. My grandparent and my parents married because "he had a good job".
Money is not something you are born with. Since money is something anyone can get to marry for money can make the woman seem shallow. Men can be called shallow for falling for looks. One isn't more right or wrong than the other. But that's what I think.
What are you talking about? Most women do marry men because the man has a good career! And Most men marry a woman because they like her looks, thats the natural order
Because we live in a world where men can do no wrong and everything women do is critiqued. The man going for looks and the woman going for money are essentially the same thing as they are both shallow, but people only bat an eyelid at the woman.
It is? Not in the U. S. it isnt!😆😆Have you seen all these apps? Tinder, OKC, POF, etc...4 out of 5 female profiles state "cash app only," or "No broke nigggas allowed," or something like that. Seems pretty socially acceptable here to me.😏
if there's no feelings behind and it's only for teh money or looks then it's not really ok. But some men love the woman's looks as apart of her as a whole as @ChurchOfIron. too add on, money is important to some extent.
I never came across anything like that. I've rather seen the opposite, women getting judged for wanting men for their money but people being ok with men wanting women for their looks only.
I agree with that, people can agree with both versions. But you didn't swap them this time. The poster said 'unacceptable' and you said 'judged for' wanting men for their money. It sounds like you're saying the same thing in the same order, not the opposite.
It would be equally as bad if a man is with a woman for her money. That's like comparing oranges to bananas. They might be fruit but not have the same type of vitamins. Your comparing materialistic double standards to vein physical standards.
Because being more sexually attracted to women with larger, fuller figures is inherently related to poverty, and resource scarcity. If a pregnant woman's facing starvation, she'll abort her baby first as malnutrition starts to set in; in evolutionary terms, that's what those subcutaneous fat deposits, especially the ones which men don't have in their breasts and their buttocks, are there for. And that's why men from impoverished backgrounds have a subconscious predilection towards 'thick' women. Men from wealthy backgrounds though, raised in resource abundant environments, don't have this bias though- starvation isn't a risk for them, and they know it never will be. So those fat deposits that make women 'thicc' are completely unnecessary, and surplus to requirements, in much the same manner as body hair. And these rich men see them in much the same way. A woman can have too much body hair, but there's no such thing as too little body hair to make her attractive, so long as she's healthy; unless you come from tribal cultures in relatively frigid regions which haven't yet grown accustomed to wearing clothes (e. g, Eskimos, and the Yaghan, both consider female body hair to be super-sexy). And likewise, in places where guys have grown accustomed to there being no risk of starving to death whatsoever, a woman can have too much body fat, but there's no such thing as too little body fat, so long as she's still healthy.
Home > Relationships > Questions > Why is it socially unacceptable for a woman to be with a man for his money but not for a man to be with a woman for her looks/body?
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
111Opinion
Because everyone knows that the girl doesn't love the man,
While the man actually likes the girl because if a guy is in a relationship with a girl he must like her personality too.
A guy who only goes for a girls looks is a bafboy you know the same ones you complain about but end up fucking
Um, no, that's not how it works lol. Plenty of guys date women solely because they're hot or physically have something they like and will kick them to the curb when someone else comes along.
You can love a man and still marry him just for his money. There's plenty of guys (and girls) who are not good partners for various reasons: Abusive, cheaters, liars, insensitive. However, people choose to stay with them anyway. Women can find a guy who is no good but still stay for the money. People stay with people they know are no good because they 'have history' or 'love them even though they're completely wrong' and the money can be what tips the scale in the marriage direction.
Shuri I don't know what guys you've dealt with but I can assure you one thing both guys and girls stick around for security yes. But most of all because they're to scared of being alone.
Thing is when a girl dates a guy for money she actually gets something out of it trips , shoes money, she pretty much just hit jackpot
When a guy dates a hot girl what's the benefits umm
Have to constantly deal with her being opsesed with herself aka inflated EGOS. she's most likely terrible in bed she's harder to impress due to the attention she gets from Instagram etc.
There's not to much benefit to dating a hot girl just for looks.
Let me tell you something a guy isint picky.
Infact a guy just wants a girl who respects him that's it. problem is to many girls don't want to show any interest and expect the guy to persue them. thats not how it works any long term relationship needs to individuals who will receive and give love.
No, they don't lol. And this is not based on guys I know personally. I don't deal with men too much anymore and it's not because of security reasons.
If a guy marries a woman for her looks, that does not mean he must also like her personality. There's zero correlation.
maybe initially yes but that will most definitely end in a divorce obviously.
by the way women due care about looks to so what's the point of this post when women due the exact same thing.
Because let me tell you girls do the exact same thing it's called BADBOY
@zeinboyu you understand 99% of women better than they understand themselves.
Hahahmm it's called redpill g you understand it or you get destroyed by it
Both are wrong in my opinion. Dating someone only for their money is wrong not to mention pretty stupid.
@Nicholas__ no
Some men are attracted to looks but the matter of the fact is that everyone is attracted by looks so you can't judge them for that because both parties are bad.
But if you dating them for money quite simple your a gold digger lmao. You have no interest in the person just wealth instead of earning your own you feed off of others through seduction like Bonnie and Clyde.
Bonnie and Clyde was seduction Bonnie had no love Clyde just attention she wanted.
Who said it's fine? Maybe a feminist hypocrite 😏
Marriage is sacred only if it's done in a chruch or another place where the couple gets the blessing of god to become one and turn into a family...
I'll never marry a girl for her looks, i'll marry her because she loves me and willing to do anything for me...
A woman shouldn't marry a man for his money because marriage came from love and not from money!
Because a lot of hypocrisy exists in society today, but here's the truth: A woman who is with a man for his money is a bitch and a thot. A man who is with a woman for her body is a cad and a louse. Individuals who act this way are reprehensible in every way and guilty of fraud and one of the most dishonourable forms of objectification.
It's acceptable both way just frown upon. If you want to pimp out 1000 women more power to yah. If you want to gold dig and bankrupt 1000 more power to yah. In both situations, no one is truly a victim. People know who they're usually dealing with. And decided not to take action. In situations like those two no one is a victim and no one is an idiot
What on Earth are you blabbing about? Women bitch about men judging them only on their looks at least as much as men bitch about women judging them only on their success or material wealth. To pretend one is more "acceptable" than the other is to be vain, petty, selfish, and daft. You act like "socially accepted" is some designed machine with pre-programmed algorithms, when in reality it is just the similar opinions of individuals who neither attempt to nor care to conspire with one another.
It's not. Its just that women go about it all wrong. If you simply had a standard ie. Only date successful men. Ok thats one thing. And in my opinion as a successful man thats a good standard. I dont want a girl who likes bums. Eww no thanks. But men who want pretty girls keep it as a standard. Ie i will not date fat girls period. What y'all do is date bums and then latch on to a rich guy. Thats disgusting and literally just trashy behavior.
You could argue that how someone looks is part of them i guess.
I dont think it is socially acceptable though we're not in the days of 'trophy wives' unless we are talking about the top earners. Then you have people marrying for looks to people marrying for money and... well they deserve each other.
It was socially acceptable to marry men for their money up until the sexual (gender) revolution of the sixties. My grandparent and my parents married because "he had a good job".
Cuz people who marry for money usually want the body of someone that isn’t their spouse, which leads to big issues.
Money is not something you are born with. Since money is something anyone can get to marry for money can make the woman seem shallow. Men can be called shallow for falling for looks. One isn't more right or wrong than the other. But that's what I think.
What are you talking about? Most women do marry men because the man has a good career!
And Most men marry a woman because they like her looks, thats the natural order
I disagree most women date and Marry guy's they find attractive in my area most of them themselves already have good job.
Because we live in a world where men can do no wrong and everything women do is critiqued. The man going for looks and the woman going for money are essentially the same thing as they are both shallow, but people only bat an eyelid at the woman.
It is? Not in the U. S. it isnt!😆😆Have you seen all these apps? Tinder, OKC, POF, etc...4 out of 5 female profiles state "cash app only," or "No broke nigggas allowed," or something like that. Seems pretty socially acceptable here to me.😏
if there's no feelings behind and it's only for teh money or looks then it's not really ok. But some men love the woman's looks as apart of her as a whole as @ChurchOfIron. too add on, money is important to some extent.
Who said it's wrong? The rich man and his gorgeous wife? Or the broke guys and ugly women?
So what does that boil the issue down to? Morality and ethics, or envy?
I never came across anything like that. I've rather seen the opposite, women getting judged for wanting men for their money but people being ok with men wanting women for their looks only.
Nah, that's not the opposite. It's what the asker is saying too.
@Boppy nope. I could ask the exact same thing in reverse and you would find people that agree with me.
I agree with that, people can agree with both versions. But you didn't swap them this time. The poster said 'unacceptable' and you said 'judged for' wanting men for their money. It sounds like you're saying the same thing in the same order, not the opposite.
Woah, you're right. I just noticed that. Thanks for pointing out.
It would be equally as bad if a man is with a woman for her money. That's like comparing oranges to bananas. They might be fruit but not have the same type of vitamins. Your comparing materialistic double standards to vein physical standards.
have you ever noticed that smaller chested women, (models, typically), tend to be with rich men (actors/other models etc..)
you never see bigger breasted women, with rich men
That doesn’t answer the question
just sayin'
i like big breasted women, but im not rich
Still didn’t answer the question. Nothing you have said so far is important.
Or you just don't realize that what im saying is the answer, because it's not what you WANT
Or maybe you just didn’t answer the question lol
Rich men prefer skinny women that's it
Because being more sexually attracted to women with larger, fuller figures is inherently related to poverty, and resource scarcity. If a pregnant woman's facing starvation, she'll abort her baby first as malnutrition starts to set in; in evolutionary terms, that's what those subcutaneous fat deposits, especially the ones which men don't have in their breasts and their buttocks, are there for. And that's why men from impoverished backgrounds have a subconscious predilection towards 'thick' women. Men from wealthy backgrounds though, raised in resource abundant environments, don't have this bias though- starvation isn't a risk for them, and they know it never will be. So those fat deposits that make women 'thicc' are completely unnecessary, and surplus to requirements, in much the same manner as body hair. And these rich men see them in much the same way. A woman can have too much body hair, but there's no such thing as too little body hair to make her attractive, so long as she's healthy; unless you come from tribal cultures in relatively frigid regions which haven't yet grown accustomed to wearing clothes (e. g, Eskimos, and the Yaghan, both consider female body hair to be super-sexy). And likewise, in places where guys have grown accustomed to there being no risk of starving to death whatsoever, a woman can have too much body fat, but there's no such thing as too little body fat, so long as she's still healthy.
Yeah, and skinny women HAVE SMALL BREASTS
Do you get my point qa, it's all about how rich the man is, GENERALLY, in what he likes on a woman