What's wrong with the man being the sole provider for a household? (Page 2)

Question

What's wrong with the man being the sole provider for a household?

Cláudio93 · Answer

If the man is the sole provider, he would be better living alone. Is she is daughter? Handicapped? Why can't she make money? What a meaningful life she has. Stay home, eat and sleep like a parasite.
Why live with a women that don't help financially, when he can live alone, save more money, no arguing.
And he can have a different women everyday if he wants.

TheBootyChest · Answer

There is nothing wrong with that, if both people are in agreement about it. Whether they understand that the man can make enough money to support the family, or maybe the woman as always dreamed of being the stay-at-home mom/wife.

MasterOfReality · Answer

Call me old fashioned, but nothing at all. Nothing wrong with both providing, or even the woman, if that arrangement suits them, But it seems most natural for the man to provide.

Levin · Answer

Here the guy would have to earn say about 50000£ per year, which I'm guessing would be a 97 percentile income here. In other words, it would not be viable for 19 in 20 men here (if my maths is correct).

Jackblue · Answer

I was raised in a family like that. I think it was nice, my mother had a lot of time for me, though she was by no means subservient to my Dad.

msc545 · Answer

I don't mind being the soul provider, but the sole provider maybe not so much.

JosyJosy · Answer

It's not wrong, at least if both are in on it.

I would like to keep working. I'm already a person who likes to stay home. Working is one of the few excuses I have to leave the house. I'd feel lazy, I'd want to keep busy

exitseven · Answer

Nothing. Guys can be nurturing and run a household. My wife stayed home for 12 years while my kids were little. We would not put them in daycare.

clairebearrrr · Answer

Nothing at all, I would honestly just rather be a stay at home mom like the olden days, but I’m actually going into accounting for myself. Haven’t met the one yet but am willing to wait!

Neko911 · Answer

It's not wrong if he's okay with it. It's wrong if the women just expects to be able 2 freeload off his money

T1038 · Answer

Well, I'm not trying to sound like an asshole but feminism and time did it. Everyone wants to be considered equal.. dont get me wrong tho, I am the provider for my family, but now at days everything is halfass backwards, and people identify as toasters, so I stopped asking questions I'm terrified of knowing the answers too lol

VanillaSalt · Answer

What’s wrong with the woman keeping the house clean, making dinner, and greeting me when I come home with the occasional foot or back rub?

Satish2607 · Answer

Nothing at all as long as it's a mutual understanding between the couple.

worldscolide · Answer

Nothing at all. On that same token women that choose to have the man be the only bread winner, if divorce happens end up winning permanent alimony.. Which is essentially theft.

0112358 · Answer

I'm the sole provider. I'm not sure I'd recommend it to families starting out. There are advantages and disadvantages.

hellionthesagereborn · Answer

Nothing as long as she is traditional as well. The issue is when she wants to be non traditional while demanding he be traditional.

TallAnon · Answer

As long as both are fine with it, nothing. I would want my wife to do something though. Especially when there's no kids.

Hispanic-Cool-Guy · Answer

Nothing. It's just not possible for like 93% of men around the world to take care of a whole family unit.

Boodica · Answer

One is then dependent on another person. If there are children involved, then an adult is necessary to manage the child. Someone has to stay home.

BarryLiverstone · Answer

Nothing if both people agree. Something if it’s forced.

K-I-S-S · Answer

Really slows down the income. Teamwork makes the dream work. No real reason to sit at home, can also have kids a bit later. Pay off debt faster, invest and enjoy life.

Juxtapose · Answer

It's just as "right" as a woman being the sole provider.

cth96190 · Answer

The soul provider, or the sole provider? There is a difference.

jerdanro · Answer

Nothing. I'd be morecomfortable with that than the other way round.

dudeinohio · Answer

In today's economy, typically, in the middle class, both partners need to work to get by . Just how things are.

sixtyeightplusone · Answer

if mothers stayed home and raised their children things would be a lot better. Obviously this depends on dad hanging around for the long term and both parents being intelligent financial planners

Massageman · Answer

Not a darn thing! As olderandwiser said, we DO need to get back to traditional family structures.

TonyMetal___86 · Answer

Nothing wrong, in contrary, that's the right thing to do if he's capable...

AdithyaR · Answer

Nothing wrong with it if that's what both the partners want.

Malik00 · Answer

I mean if you're ok with your wife and kids looking at you as nothing more then a glorified ATM have at it.

scooogy · Answer

What's wrong with the woman having a dozen kids and doing all the chores?

themythos · Answer

Nothing but its gonna be expensive for one person to be bringing in all the money alone.

skeetskeetskeet · Answer

As long as she keeps that ass in check... nothing

OddBeMe · Answer

I like women with ambition. Get a fucking job.

bamesjond0069 · Answer

Nothing. Its the ideal scenario.

Bklynbadboy12 · Answer

Nothing is wrong with it I love it

Mensur002 · Answer

Nothing. I wish the days when men acted like men and women acted like women.

TheUniqueOne96 · Answer

Nothing, if that's what both want.

TacosRAwesome · Answer

Whatever works for the family involved.

Miristheiss · Answer

Are you a graphic designer?

Stevefiveo · Answer

There's nothing wrong with it.

joeldalton · Answer

*sole. But yeah nothing is wrong with it.

GAGSucksBalls1 · Answer

what do you think?

maryisbreathing · Answer

Nothing as long as he's fine with doing it

Ninjaflowers · Answer

I have no idea.

BubbaTech · Answer

When he dies. No provider.

anylolone · Answer

The dependence it creates.

zoobs94 · Answer

Only thus wrong is its not in fashion nowadays 😂

Iron_Man · Answer

There’s nothing wrong with it at all

hunsinger · Answer

Nothing at all!

Pighttussy · Answer

The lack of acknowledgement

Jmmmfi4 · Answer

Not everyone can afford to live off one income

Not_Average · Answer

Nothing at all.

Grond21 · Answer

Nothing at all.

Joshua213 · Answer

Nothing

MrCreep · Answer

I don't think women are that pathetic

MrTaboo · Answer

Not a damn thing

Romeocuck · Answer

Nothing

Steve1071 · Answer

Nothing.

Calgarydirty69 · Answer

you could get sick

What's wrong with the man being the sole provider for a household? (Page 2)

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.