
What's the difference between leading and ruling?


We could wrestle all day on this issue. The bottom line is whether the person in charge is worthy of the position, do their policies produce a profit for the Earth and its inhabitants? Rulers typically focus on maintaining a structure that upholds their power. That is there primary focus, like a gardener who constantly weeds and sows and fertilizes, they work against nature. The Leader strives for balance and beauty. All things have a purpose in which they can be illuminated and purposeful. They just require the proper arrangement. The only thing standing in the way of peace and prosperity on this planet are the one who strive to out do the others, even they must be put in their place and controlled! Who will watch the watchers Jean? Maybe you.
That's a really good and complete opinion, thank you for sharing it!
I especially agree with you on the part ''All things have a purpose in which they can be illuminated and purposeful. They just require the proper arrangement.''. I also agree that control must be placed on whoever is leader, as to make sure power doesn't get to their head.
Leading is by conscious voluntary choice by all parties.
Ruling is leading by way of some natural force, whether it be societal, emotional, or physical.
Kids are ruled by their parents from an early age. They emotionally understand at the end of the day their parents decide and the kid listens, with some freedom to make their own choices.
at least this is true when kids have good parents. As much freedom as possible while ultimately listening to parental decisions when it matters.
As the child ages the ruling changes to leading. The parents aren't deciding for you but rather are now guides that lead you through difficult times. Helping navigate successes and failures.
As you get older your parents are closer to advisors and friends, because you are the leader of your life now. Then you have kids and are now the ruler. The cycle continues.
Ruling leaves no more for suggestions or opinions. It's a dictatorship. Do what you're told when you're told. Show reverence and respect whereas with leading, you're being guided by a knowledgeable person (s) who was either chosen or took the role because they have the qualifications to do so.
A more democratic approach? Certainly taking into account the other person/people.
'Iron fist' comes to mind.
Yes. This topic came to mind because of a quote of former Portoguese PM - and de facto dictator - Oliveira Salazar ''I won't be able to lead until I'll be surrounded by people with conscience. So for now, I rule''
Opinion
30Opinion
A lot a guess
leading is like: taking all the good or worst (most importantly) first on your back credit goes to everyone if it's good and worst come only on your back if you are leading leading is like scarifice
Ruling is like: Bad King theory 😂 keeping your slave in front raw to sloughter if you wins you take all the credit without remorse if you loosing yoi will blame others
It's like same in ruling you don't sacrifice you just take credit or advantage , blame others for issue , you are not responsible for worst you will hide your self
So In real life relationship be the leader if she is afraid to lead let her rule the thrones of relationship under your leadership ❤️❤️
Ruling is biblical leadership.
"Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."
Gen 3:16
"[Jesus] shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father."
Rev 2:27
'Leading' is what losers do. The Emperor of Constantinople died in a suicidal defense of the city. He "led" his people. He was still a loser.
The rulers goal is 'dont lose.'
Hitler once said, "I consider it my right to send the German youth to their deaths." He believed that men are born to be ruled over.
Of course, both the bible and fascism are out of favor in modern feminist societies because of that.
A leader listens to all the options and chooses what's best for the people he leads. A ruler only does what he or she wants and chooses the best option purely for themselves (and possibly their loyal subordinates, as well).
I'd say most world "leaders" we have nowadays are just elected rulers.
I tried typing this before it cut me off the connection but I was saying that ruling people are more likely to take control and make decisions while leading people take action before it’s fully formed by any said person in the group or relationship, either way both can be impulsive just for different reasons.
The former sounds like any authority is derived from people naturally following a leader wheras ruling has been done by tyrants, emperors and many people who weren't necessarily attractive because of their intelligence or leadership capabilities and can be ruling solely by brute force
A difference between a ruler and a leader is mostly morals and finding logical solutions.
Rulers: Are people who classified as authority figures and usually their way is the only way in their mind. This could be your parents, your teachers depends if the teacher doesn't blindly see themselves as superior. Cops and judges could probably be an authority figure, oh and don't forget about your boss he or she is also a ruler.
Leaders: Leaders on the other hand try to figure out a ton of problems while including his/her workers on the discussion before the leader figure out the best solution to your problem.
Everyone likes a leader.. leader is the one who gets himself into hard situation with his followers, he's brave, equitable, charismatic, forward looking, positive and friendly
Whilte boss or ruler are most likely, not liked by anyone that much, has ass-lickers around of them, has people who gonna do tasks for them, they're usually people who see theirselves on higher position than anyone else.
Ruling implies the use of some kind of force that ensures people are following or doing what the ruler wants them to do.
Leading is giving some guidance by example, maybe there's some use of propaganda or motivational speeches but no actual force that makes people to follow a certain path.
At least that's my understanding.
…. 🤔 leading (a dog collar and chain) and ruling (a whip)?….. or do you mean outside the bedroom? 🤔😂
I mean outside the bedroom
Leading is involving everyone around you and pushing them to get the best results by working just as hard.
Ruling is when you still involve everyone around you but you don't work with them you just command.
Leaders lead by example. They treat those below them with the utmost kindness knowing those people support them. They surround themselves with people smarter than them knowing they will better themselves as a result.
.
Rulers give orders, treat the people below them like shit and get rid of the smart ones and promote the ones that value their same narcissistic desires.
basically... ruling is what happens when you're not capable of leading.
Best answer so far
thank you lol... but I've been extremely busy while still around here, so I was trying to condense a whole thought (s) into one sentence... besides there's many good points too in the comments as well
Leading is acting in a way that makes people want to follow. Ie they agree with your way of doing things. Ruling is disregarding what other wants and forcing people to align with your plan and goals.
Leading is a two way relationship-based activity, even in politics or Royalty. I'm inspired by leaders like Queen Elizabeth and President Obama and JFK.
A ruler is someone who wants power for themselves and their own selfish reasons. You see it more in politics than Royalty although there's been a few exceptions over the past few centuries in Europe (not just England). Often it doesn't end well for them (Charles I, Nixon, Drumpf)
Leading is stepping up and doing what must be done in the moment. Ruling is making lasting rules and trying to decide everything unilaterally. The difference comes down to intent and length of time.
This one is rather accurate:
rulers are like
more direct leaders right? 「(゚<゚) ゙?
a leader makes his group of followers stronger with himself. a ruler prefers his followers to remain weaker than him.
Leading is easy, succeed or fail you are still the one that led. Ruling is hard, succeed you rule, fail you are the destroyer of worlds.
Supporting to get to a goal is leading, ruling is is having a goal but forcing people to work to achieve it while the one giving order does nothing and takes all of the credit.
In leading, the person being leaded on feels safe and happy.
Ruling requires a dictator who can't lead properly.
A ruler has total power a leader doesn't necessarily
A leader is chosen by the people. A ruler is someone that has taken control by force.
Hitler was elected.
@Lost_in_the_Woods He wasn't a ruler. He was a dictator. Dictators get elected, just like Trump was. Mussolini was elected. A ruler was the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito.
The first one is competent cooperation and the other is arbitrary tyranny
When you lead, others have the choice to follow. When you rule they are deprived of choice.
Leaders help their followers, and rulers abuse and/or ignore them.
Leaders understand that being in charge is a responsibility and a burden.
Rulers only want to be in charge for their own benefit.
Leading is getting people to follow you through desire. Ruling is getting people to follow you through force
Setting policies for people to follow Vs giving orders for people to follow.
Leading - they follow you because they want to
Ruling - they follow you because they have to
LEADING is to GUIDING, as RULING is to CONTROLLING 😉
Interpretation of said instructions
leadin is a noble responsibility where as ruilin is basically dictatorship and tyranny
You have to physically be there to lead
Ruling is general, leading is personal
Oh is it. Thank you. You said much simpler what I was wanting to say.
Hehehe really? How so? (But one of the idiot has gave a minus vote) 🤣
Date me and find out. That's called leveraging power, and it is your first lesson.
Hmm... so what do you mean
If I told you, you wouldn't be learning much would you? 😆
I thought you were a feminist. Ask a woman what I meant. She can tell you Im full of crap and everyone can go home happy. Except me of course. I know too much to ever be happy outside the arms of beautiful woman.
my language is not English. Maybe that's why I didn't understand. 😁
Im American so it amazing you can understand anything I've said at all. Did you read my post that You so eloquently condensed?
People follow leaders, they obey rulers
The leash.
And like others said,
Who goes first and walks into the spider webs.
Control Factor
You can also add your opinion below!