Do you think pushing women out of the home and into an increasingly unforgiving workforce was an impressive mass manipulation?

[coachTanthony]

Not to mention getting these same women to "celebrate" this and call it "empowerment"

YES

No it's called EMPOWERMENT

see poll ( Coach are you hiring a secretary "wink?" )

[Guy13]

We all know that the Traditional family is the underpinnings of any successful Society. Removing women from the household was a multiple entity effort by the government, business, and those who wanted to bring down our country through family destruction.

Business saw a plethora of cheap resources and during WW2 as the ladies proved they could sustain industrial progress while guys were at War. Business was sold then.

The hatred of War and the Jungian approach “everything that is wrong will be right and all that is right will be wrong (red book)” was in process. Jungian crowd attack on traditional values organized 1949-1960 exploded with Vietnam. The test case was available and “Peace not War” originating from 40s took off with 60s as well as “love” Sexual Revolution. Women were free in choice on all matters no matter how harmful those were to Society as a whole.

Government went Left from the 50s into 60s into Present. And both Education and law schools/judges were taken by the Left.

Feminism, Abortion, Sexual Revolution, and LGBTQ are shining accomplishments in the effort to destroy family and this country.

[Ryan365]

People might not like this answer but he's not wrong.

[This_Is_My_Opinion8]

You are completely wrong. The government didn't had anything to do with women's place in society. They fought for it literally against everyone's wishes.
Yes, they did make for cheap labor to replace the men that were at war, but make no mistake at all times they were still expected to fill their role in society and to get back to the house after the war.

And families are not and berg were under attack. Feminism has nothing against families and neither does the LGBT. All of that is false propaganda for those who seek control of peoples lives.

[Guy13]

@This_Is_My_Opinion8 Hey Portugal, you k now NOTHING as it relates to USA. Know what
you are talking about.

NO Government and especially the Liberal Democratic Socialists wanted to keep women in their place.

It was the Christians with the orphanages, Woman suffrage, hospitals, poor, and education that

caused change. The issues, that Society as a whole and Government did not want to deal with,

were taken on by the Christians and the Bible. Civil Rights again with the Leftists Democrats

while all the Christians huddled around the Bible with MLK leading.

[This_Is_My_Opinion8]

Christians in history were always the first ones to fight for things to stay the same and not move forward.

[BlackBeauty90]

Except women have always worked in varying degrees. Average person should educate themselves about human history, it's not hard. As then they won't seem stupid.

History even includes in fields of indirect medicine, etc. Hell in the United States generations ago certain categories of women had more land owning rights and by extension voting rights than men who did not own property.

But that is the success of feminism. The ignorance of the average person. This question is a prime example of that.

Feminism was NOT about putting women into the work force, feminism was about equal opporunities. Meant education & if the desire work. In the initial setup of feminism a LOT of women used it as a means of working in the mainstream because they & their mothers & grandmothers & great-grandmothers and great-great grandmothers and ions worth of women had ALREADY BEEN DOING IT on minor scale for GENERATIONS beforehand to HELP with the household income. Everything from catching mussles in sea ports to tanning cow hides for sale, etc, etc., etc.

.

The real difference in today's society isn't due to feminism but rather due to the inflation and cost of living.

Unless making 100,000+ annually the average household can barely support 2 people comfortably (and by this I don't mean lavishly, I mean without having to worry about paying the bills & having money left for food) in some cities.

Throw in some children to the mix and you're an idiot to think a successful household when living cheque to cheque and barely able to afford heating bills on one income.

[coachTanthony]

Let's not call people idiots.

[Sirenboobzilla]

I think women should be able to find for themselves. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being a stay at home wife/mom. But if shit goes south and she has no skills outside of the house, it can be really tough for someone to put food on their own table.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

No I do not. Women have always worked throughout history.

This idea that women just stayed home 24/7 cooked and clean is a myth.

Besides, the point a woman that doesn't have her own job and money and isn't self efficient but 100% relies on a man to look out for her as she is a child is bound to get abused and mistreated by that man as some point because mankind in particular the heathen man is wicked and governed by his selfish motives and sinful flesh.

If someone is going to provide food, shelter and clothing then best believe it comes with strings attached.

He isn't doing it out of the good will of his heart.

[coachTanthony]

Good points

[SassyAussieAddy]

It certainly was a win for governments when income tax collection from a whole new work force came flowing in xD

[coachTanthony]

And they didn't pay women a lot anyway. Cheap labor.

[Anonymous]

Reproductive cycle of a women it’s physiological changes with cycles and hormones etc so different for men
9 to 5 was created to fit male physiology that’s hard for women.. to do! That’s why at the end of the day the women femininity is dead when a women goes home she can’t be that sweet and attractive anymore. While a men even if he looks tired and dead after work he still sexy to a women eyes for a men seeing a tired women isn’t that h o t or attractive.. at all

[Aiko_E_Lara]

That can also apply to men not working and not burdening themselves making them unattractive while a woman can just rest whenever she wants and can still be attractive

[BlackBeauty90]

You can't handle a simple 9 to 5 job? What are you, lazy?

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@BlackBeauty90 When exactly did I say that? Can you not read?

[DaisyM23]

technically we're all just contributing to the same capitalist system of oppression where the w/class are exploited and alienated from the real problems caused by the u/class etc
it's empowerment too

[Cassie88]

Of course, because women having choice is "manipulation". You're a funny guy! :D

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Yes they got the choice but majority would haven't just choose the traditional role if nobody will try to pressure them like feminists do looking down on women being happy with the path she chose.

[coachTanthony]

choice to work for 75% less then a man instead of staying home and raising kids?

[Cassie88]

We don't earn less. The "gender wage gap" is largely a myth, and as for staying at home and raising children - I, like many others, never wanted children. We don't care. It's MY life, not yours. I get to make the decisions. That's what's known as freedom. Don't like it? Tough shit!

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Nobody here is forcing you. But i could just guarantee that you could be brainwashed just like a lot of women on average

[Red-Blaze]

I wote a really long answer with history and stuff and network failed... so lets go short 😅

Woman have always worked to a degree

The empowermant and all that is maniplation to try to make it more common to more jobs, more full time, and more diffrent job, this happen when man where unable to give the needed man power while a little world war was going on

So I think you can say yes, but not in a ngative way

Feel free to correct me :)

[Wraith_Cemetery]

The demasculization and defeminization of the populace is a mass manipulation as well. Feminine women are now considered weak which is why most girls have completely abandoned it. We all look the same and act the same now. The only difference is the genitalia.

[FreyaRed]

Wage dumping. From perspective of people who exploit human resources it was a master manipulation.

[misogynistic_pig]

It was necessary , since women were no longer having children as before, they no longer contributed anything to society, so it was necessary to put them to "work", Note the quotes, because in reality they do not work, they only do desk jobs.

[Anonymous]

It's largely a choice and women have always worked. Feminism hasn't done as much as feminists will claim largely it was the arrival of the birth control pill in the 60s and the fact that most jobs traditionally done by men have gotten easier due to mechanisation and labour saving tools. Look how many women there are driving lorries today, lorry driving is a skilled career but not as difficult as it was in say the 60s.

[TrueConfection]

Not to mention the lack of increase in wages for men.

[joeldalton]

Yup. 100%. The bill of lies sold to women by feminists is amazing.

[LegendaryDater]

Totally agree. What a sham women fell for and now they are more lonely then ever.

[Shamalien]

Yup. All part of the plan to destroy the family unit

[SaoirseS]

Is this today’s provocative bait question?

[coachTanthony]

You decide.

[SaoirseS]

And that answers that LOL.

[coachTanthony]

You could play along and give an opinion lol

[SaoirseS]

I would, but every time I do it elicits more fuel for the never-ending battle of the sexes, in which I don't like to engage. Since I was never pushed out of or into anything and because the term "empowerment" is becoming cliche, all I want to do is enjoy my job, serve my community, take care of my people and my marriage and be left the hell alone.

[coachTanthony]

You're on GAG you're a fibber. lol

[SaoirseS]

Where's that middle finger emoji when I need it LOL

[coachTanthony]

Yeah Yeah you crave the action. lol

[SaoirseS]

You're the instigator. You throw the grenade into the mix, then sit back with popcorn and watch the action. I got your number Mister LOL

[coachTanthony]

I cannot confirm or deny.

[SaoirseS]

You don't have to, I can confirm :-)

[Anonymous]

Yes. They still haven't realised they are now active tax agents like the rest of us. An impressive slight of hand indeed.

[Wish4UrB00ty]

Lol! Love the options on this. 😂😂 too bad it all made things so fluky.

[Anonymous]

I'll just say I'm more than happy that girls get academical degrees and/or work jobs. I don't want to have it any other way. this Certainly beats gold diggers for me.

[BJP21]

Seeing women in the Auto industry is speaking volumes to me.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Yes that was manipulation in disguise. Women were happier compared to women now

[Guardian45]

No, I believe most women chose it for necessity or fiscal reasons.

[msc545]

They dd it to themselves thanks to feminism

[NathanDavis]

history revised... lol