If im financially supporting a woman and providing for her, I do have some level of authority. Agree or disagree?

[Chthou95]

Otherwise it would just be responsibility without authority

Agree

Disagree

A total of 16 votes were cast: 4 girls and 12 guys. See detailed results

[Anonymous]

Unless she has given you children, I don't see why any man would financially support a woman. If they decide to do support them anyway, then that's on you.

If she is the mother of your child, you should make sure she's good, because it's the same thing as taking care or your kid. Kids needs their mom. As a man, that's just something you should do.

If you do those things, and aren't a complete moron, for the most psrt most women will have no problem letting you lead. That's what a lot of them want. They just need to trust you enough and feel respected.

But the thing a lot of guys don't understand is you can lead and be asertive without being an asshole. There is a respectful way to go about it.

[TheSpaceGnome]

If you are the sole provider, you would have complete authority on any financial expenses.

[Anonymous]

yes you'd have some level of authority but that's not exactly equal partnership, there are plenty of households where the man works but the woman is in charge of delegating finances and the house etc - changes for different people's wants/needs

[Chthou95]

There is no such thing as an equal partnership. Someone is always leading and usually its the man

[kylee2437]

This is why women are starting to become more independent and make their own income so a man doesn’t feel like he has authority in the relationship all the way

[JBlade]

I don’t understand this need for leverage. Its just sad and weird, really says a lot about most people. Why can’t it just be 50/50, equal say so?

[kylee2437]

@JBlade wouldn’t that be great? Except the reality is, is when someone is providing more in a relationship, they feel more entitled to authority and that’s where it starts. I’m sure women wouldn’t have started the feminist movement if men actually treated women like individuals back then

[Chthou95]

@JBlade There is no 50/50 partnership. One is always going to lead

[WhitneySnow]

Disagree. But you have the right to stop supporting her and break up with her, just like she has the right to break up with you.

[Quackthulu2]

It depends. If the woman is a child and you are her parent or guardian then yes. Otherwise no.

[Billlewis]

I think that, if anything, you have even less authority, because if you could date her without paying her bills, I assume you probably would. This is my opinion only.

[mobiusforniner]

What do you mean by authority? That sounds weird. Like, she's a slave to your will? You should recalibrate your thinking if you're hoping for a successful marriage.

[Lliam]

To want authority/control/dominance over someone is pathetic. That's not a relationship. Who would put up with that?

[DextroShade]

Completely agree, relationships only ever work when the man leads. Women who can't submit to male authority are for the streets.

[Chthou95]

Oh dont tell them that though. You're gonna be called a misogynist

[misogynistic_pig]

Not legally, you're actually at a disadvantage, plus only beta vendors do that.

[Anonymous]

You have the authority to say GTFO. That's about it.