The error of Christianity since century 1, is in it having flipped ever since, from Christ being the measure of His subordinates, to its now reversal.

[flautistnaturist]

We can say it's not true if we choose to, but His Spirit's produce, described plainly in Scripture as all believers sharing all things as common between them, no longer calling what had been theirs, their own any longer, and there so no more being any rich nor poor among them, as there are always poor for the rich to be un-greedying themselves with instead, no longer exists among those who pretend to follow Him today. It is a different spirit, among those who refuse this Way, than that Spirit described in the New Testament of the Bible, regardless of any and whatever pomp and circumstance we may clamor around with as though to the contrary. Even then, in Scripture, His Way was described as having turned the world upside down, and yet since the end of first century AD, it has been turned back as it had been, and claimed even so, still to be the Master's plan. But no. But God. People purporting to serve the Creator both then and today, instead call His actual Way cultish, in both Scripture and in common life today. But should we not turn back to Yehoshua the Messiah authentically, with His return now so imminent? Will we not regret it as those before us will who did not, Him already having said that many will call Him, even doubly, their direction in all things, but only receive Him saying He never knew us and to leave Him, if we now do not go by what He actually has meant by what He actually has said?

Plainly He said, that until heaven and earth pass away, that the instruction of the Hebrew Deity, YHVH, received already then by them prior, will still apply, with those who share all things in total surrender to Him who teach and do such being considered the greatest among them, and those who share all things who do not do such and teach not to, the least among them. Apparently, even some who committed recording of subsequent Scripture, were among those He describes as least among those who share all things together for Him, having declared such Loving Instruction from the Creator no longer to matter? The Savior Himself is the Creator's Authority on the matter, over any who claim to follow Him. His declaration on the matter is the over-ruling one.

Whatever else people do, putting His trademarks on even so, He and His Father are Judge of together. May they have mercy on us all. The Savior has said those who are merciful will be blessed in receiving mercy. Nobody is going to be forcing us to do as His actual words do in fact intend, but there will come a time if we do not, when we will be missing the result of if we had. Some have said man is free the moment he chooses to be. Isn't it best we choose Him as He actually Is in His freedom from error for us, while the choosing is still good?

He promised that any who have given up family or lands to heed Him as He actually intends will receive a hundred times more family and lands and persecution and eternal life. Have we in reality received a hundred times more family and lands and persecution and eternal life? If not, are we not off His mark for us? Most televangelists tout nice cars or stars on the walk of fame rather than being stoned to death or some such other as His real followers proved to be in Scripture. It doesn't really seem to be persecution as promised, so indeed is it really eternal life for such, as promised? Or are such not in fact even participating in truly following what the Savior Is actually about? Do you have a hundred times the spiritual family members and lands as those of your natural and married family, that you could go to live on those lands with all that extended family if directed from among a unified following among them all after Him? Or are we more just followers of television stars than we are followers of the One who suffered total denial as a human being, for the sake of continuing to Love us all without fail? Who are we really becoming more like? Should we not at least be real about it, whether yes, or whether no? His followers, or the contrary? He Is risen from the dead in the flesh and has promised us to live even if we die, for believing on who He *actually Is*. But are we maybe even instead just believing on some conceptualization or another, which He in actuality is not? From among those things, some questionably, touted, as being His actual teaching, how is it, in what way, did He actually say?

?? Is it so? ??

[strateguy632]

yes catholics should have continued emphasized jesus instead of changing to popes and mary etc. that was error.