I do. I just noticed that I have asked 666 questions so I am asking this question to get it to 667.

I do. I just noticed that I have asked 666 questions so I am asking this question to get it to 667.

666 is the number of a man. It is not clear yet what that means. When we do figure it out the rapture will have already occurred so I won't have to worry about it. All I know is that all will have to worship him as he will proclaim himself as being god.
Rapture? You're aren't going anywhere. Hollywood movies are wrong.
Christians will suffer a beheading. I have already accepted my fate in dying for Christ.
@Fuentes You will worship the Antichrist? Everyone who takes the mark. on his right wrist or forehead, will be spending time with him in the lake of fire. Of course, if someone is already headed that way it will not stop them from getting it. If you don't get the mark you will not be allowed to buy or sell. So you will starve to death or be killed. You lose any way you look at it, except one.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy The only ones that will face beheading is the ones who become saved during the Tribulation. I don't know where you get your theology at. But if you want to hang here on Earth while the rest of us are taken up, be my guest.
@daniela
I think there are many good scholars as to the timing of the rapture. So many that although I lean towards a pre trib rapture, it could be post trib too. Frankly I don’t take an official position on it as there are plenty of good verses used by post tribers to back their views.
At the end of the day everything in the Trib is about Jerusalem, Israel and the Jews. No instructions are given for the church. Plenty are given for Jews in regards to the trib. I think the tribs purpose is the eradication of sinners, hence it is called the days of wrath, and the restoration of apostate Israel.
They asked for the blood of Jesus to be on their heads and the heads of their children. This request will be granted as God purges the unbelieving Jews from the rest of the 144,000.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy Well you can stay if you like. I'm going with Christ when he comes to take his people out before God's judgements come. The ones who become Christians during the Tribulation will be the ones beheaded.
I'm not sure.
Poor Bill.
Thanks for the MHO
Poor Bill? He had Monica Lewinski.
Opinion
43Opinion
I believe it's a symbol - for what - nobody that I am aware of knows or can prove it if they do know. I think it might have more than one intended meaning, but I believe one possible meaning is having a critical and hostile or abusive disposition towards others or towards God or towards or how they view themselves and relate to the world.
No- but then, I actually KNOW a little about Hebrew numerology. The Devil is 616; 666 refers to Nero. I'm not sure where the confusion came from, unless it's some kind of ancient anti-Babylonian prejudice (Babylonian numerology had 6 as the holiest number, instead of 7, like the proto-Israelites did, and I'm convinced the historical antagonism is the origin of the bias against the number 13- most people cite some element of Christianity, but it predates that).
As Nero and Babylon are both LONG gone, it seems very silly to still be so angry at them. I'm also not sure why the Devil would be so invested in numbers.
Both numbers are Nero. 616 is in Latin, 66 is in Hebrew.
666 in Hebrew. I really need an edit button
The belief that 666 is the Devil's number is rooted in religious and cultural symbolism. In Christian tradition, the number 666 is often associated with the Devil or Satan. It is mentioned in the Book of Revelation in the Bible, specifically in Chapter 13, where it is described as the "number of the beast." However, interpretations and beliefs about this number vary among different individuals and religious denominations.
It's important to note that the significance of numbers can be subjective and vary across different cultures and belief systems. While some people may associate 666 with negative connotations, others may not attribute any special meaning to it. Ultimately, whether or not you believe 666 is the Devil's number is a personal belief or interpretation based on your own religious, cultural, or philosophical perspectives.
thats what I hear, no idea. I guess it doesn't like up well with 7 or 40 which the good guys use. God had it rain 40 day sand 40 nights to wipe out people that were just awful decrept, ugh... we got a lot of that going on again, but that' wasn't the devil, whom was probably very upset and made a protest to such action.
so just relax, I think God's got this... and enjoy your fame.
I don't believe in the Hebrew Bible, and I tend not to believe in the supernatural. I think Revelations is kind of whacked.
If 666 was an actual prediction, I think it would refer to the idea of transhumanism (things like the gene modifying covid jab, or requiring microchipping in order for people to buy, sell or have access to things). I will never submit to that.
Here's something I found about the origin of 666:
https://history.howstuffworks.com/history-vs-myth/666.htm
Here is something about other symbolisms of the number:
https://www.chakratoya.com/blog/angel-number-666-meaning
Nope, I don't.
I had a 666 phone number once. I liked it. Some others thought I was a bit nuts, lol.
I take the '4' numbers now. Because it phonetically sounds like 'death' to Chinese. More nonsense I don't care about. But I do resent it affecting real estate prices and housing (eliminating floors in buildings). I will take all the ones they don't want, including '7 '. But they are hogging the other numbers. That's the problem.
It's just a number, just like any other. Numbers aren't "magical", they can't harm you. Why do so many people persist in believing things that are patently untrue?
Why? It’s just a number. Why must we ascribe a meaning to things that are meaningless? 666, 13, 7, 42 etc are all just numbers.
Personally I hate it when people say they are not superstitious but then do crap like “knock on wood” or believe black cats are evil. It’s all the same and just as stupid.
No, it's not even the original text: https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/11603/what-is-the-original-number-of-the-beast It's some medeval scholar trying to play neumorology.
Nope. In Chinese it’s a lucky number, liu liu liu, it means luck. That’s shy they include it everywhere. Someone noticed a pattern and decided it’s a devil’s number. It’s funny.
*that’s why
Oh glad to see you are joking. Some people really believe it’s a devil’s number and for a moment I thought you might have been one of them 😂
666 is a funny number because in German you pronounce it like 'sexhoondredsexoondsextieg'. Religious people are just WEAK for hating on this glorious number.
weeelll... now that you mention it, it's what I've been told. As 777 is jesus' number... however, never questioned to why their numbers are that...
Great, something to look up after i sleep.
thats the number of luck, god doesn't have a number but its definitely the closest to good tho
7 is the number to represent complete, perfect or God. I. e. earth was created in 7 days, 7 years in the Great Tribulation etc.
6 is the number of man. 666 means the beast is the ultimate sinner. As man was born into sin, the beast will be the the greatest and most extraordinary sinner ever. He will be human, but likely given supernatural power by Satan. So by adding 2, 6’s to the number of man making it 666 means he will embody all of the worst characteristics of sinful man to the max.
In like fashion 40 is the number of judgment I. e. rained 40 days and nights.
7 is the number of completeness, not god, although triple 6 is the number of the beast, god doesn't have or need a number but i guess if people want to consider 7 the number of god then they could but i wouldn't call it the number of god cause i dont recall the bible saying that, and if it does, i haven't read that part yet lol
All I know is that 666 is the middle 3 digits of my ex-girlfriend's Social Security Number.
Six hundred and sixty-six is the Mark of the Beast in the Revelation of Jesus Christ in the Bible. Though some Christians approach Revelation literally, historically it's been viewed by most Christians as an apocalyptic work of allegory and symbolism. "666" being the Devil's mark comes from association with Revelation.
Imagine thinking numbers have celestial meanings when it's a unit we use to simply measure things. No, of course I don't.
naw... I don't believe in bullshit. Horoscopes and such bullshit can lick the fromudna cheese fromunda my bals.
Yes. 6 is the number of man as Adam was created on the 6th day by God.
666 is the number of the anti-christ demonic system during the last days on earth that will be forced upon the whole world to get in order to buy and sell.
I'm dying for Christ and the gospel because I will refuse that number or mark of the beast til the end of my life.
It's the number of the beast. I guess you were a beast for a little while
I dont associate it with anything good and stay away from it
@Girl242 the myth is that if a black cat crosses your path while driving, you should turn the car around and go in a different direction. We always did
I'm with you. I often see the number show up in a wide variety of things. Just the other day, my car odometer read 76661.
Get out quick before it bursts into flames.
In the 6th day, God created the man. The man became imperfect. Three times 6, means in biblical sense: imperfect creation, imperfect creation, imperfect creation.
I don't believe in God and the devil, in a literal sense; therefore: 666 is for me, the utterly imperfection of humankind.
Well I don't believe in Supernatural, also are God and Devil are really all that different? :)
https://www.youtube.com/embed/CZplzRg6ZP4I believe the only thing that exist is God. The devil is God. The devil is just the inverse nature of God but it's God. Everything is the same thing but different forms and natures. I believe God is Amoral makes a lot of sense. I believe all the people in the Bible are thought people and the whole thing is just allegory teaching us about the spiritual unfoldment of every person and the laws of nature.
Sounds pretty logical to me, that can explain why God has Flooded the World.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KN4654qFxzk
I haven't done enough research on this to believe it.
How will you ever believe if you never do the research?
@Exterminatore Obliviousness is bliss!
Yes, but won’t be an acceptable excuse on the day of Judgment. However I have no intention of pressuring you so I’ll back off and allow you your views.
@Exterminatore But what if you don't believe in all that?
I definitely do. Do you know about Christianity?
Unbelief and rejection of Christ will be the main reason for eternal punishment in the next world, according to scripture.
@Exterminatore According to scripture, but what if that's put down by men to keep people in line? To keep people sane in dire times
Well God actually wrote it by men’s hands would be a better way to explain it. The Holy Spirit directly influenced them as to what to write. They just wrote what they were told. Take this verse for example.
“Jesus left the temple area and was going on His way when His disciples came up to point out the temple buildings to Him. But He responded and said to them, “Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone here will be left upon another, which will not be torn down.””
Matthew 24:1-2 NASB2020
Matthew was written before 70 AD. The temple Jesus is referring to there was known as Herod’s temple. It was one of the wonders of the ancient world.
The Jews revolted in 70 AD, in Jerusalem and eventually fortified themselves in the temple as there was no where left to go. The Romans decided to end it, and set the temple alight. Bear in mind this was a massive building even for that time. There was so much gold used in the interior of the temple that the heat melted it. The gold ran in between the bricks. The Romans literally ripped the temple down brick by brick to get the gold out, leaving only a retaining wall which today is known as the wailing wall where Jews to this day mourn the loss of that temple.
Now that said. That a one in a million to guess that would happen. So it wasn’t a guess. Far to specific. That’s just one piece of evidence that is impossible to ignore. There are many more.
So…If Jesus were a fraud, how could he have predicted that? Matthew who wrote the book of Matthew is no fortune teller. He did quote Jesus there, however he was instructed what to write by the Holy Spirit, which is God himself in one of 3 forms.
@Exterminatore How do you know it was God and not just some cheeky men who wrote it down?
Do you know who Jesus disciples were? 12 eye whiteness testimonies. Of the 12 only 11 we’re martyred. Only one, John died of natural causes in Patmos.
My question to you is who would die for a lie? Peter and the other disciples could have renounced the faith and worship Caesar as by law they were commanded to. If they knew Jesus was a fraud, why die for a lie. They could have just fled.
Buy instead they died getting the account of Jesus to the world.
I am enjoying our conversation. Where are you from?
@Exterminatore Cultists die for a lie. There was a case in Mexico where some women portrayed herself as a reincarnation of a goddess to villagers. They believed her and started blood sacrificing one another to please that goddess, who was actually but a regular person.
That’s basically devil worship as far as I’m concerned.
You do make a good point. But if they didn’t see his miracles, and all else, they would know he was a sham. Thomas, his disciple died in India. Thrust through with a spear. Who is gonna walk to India from the then Roman province of Judea to spread some message knowing it’s a lie. Save the trip bud and ditch the authorities.
What kind of name is yanniska? Other peoples cultures interest me.
Can you speak Latin? Potes dicere latine?
I know that this was a miss direction by satanists coz the devil picked 11 as his number is signify *1besides1* to show that he has power to rival God himself, what a terrible lie to deceive his dummy followers, they're really fumb to buy that coz hello, OUR GOD created him, which allmighty being would create anyone or leave a route for that creature to to achieve power to rival his creator?
Anyone into satanism. Woe to them. They are of the biggest losers.
No. I believe its 616. That's what Stephen Fry told me
I never experienced anything good or bad related to this number.
Yes, it's the mark of the beast, meaning the devil's mark. If anyone apporoaches you to take the 666 mark on your wrist or forehead don't take it or else you will end up in hell.
It's really 999. y'all just read it upside down. Will you still be with us 1 short of a thousand?
No. Only idiots believe stupid crap like that.
Wow. Thanks for setting me straight. And here I was thinking only atheists believe in childish and frankly silly ideas like evolution, which I might add is THEORY, but spoken of as fact.
@Exterminatore You're misunderstanding the use of the word theory. Theory is a polysemus word like bank, light or sound. In scientific parlence, it means an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that has been repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Evolution has been tested and corroborated with reliable evidence. All biology as we know it wouldn't make sense or be useful without the knowledge of evolution.
Theory in common parlence is defined more like hypothesis. A hypothesis can only become a scientific THEORY after confirmation through experimentation and peer review. Electromagnetism is another example of THEORY in scientific terms but it is a fact in terms of common understanding. Evolution is thd same.
So you have learned something new today, you're welcome.
No missing link? Then it’s a theory and always will be.
@Exterminatore It is a theory in the scientific sense of the word. In the common usage sense, it is a fact. As far as your question on missing links goes, it depends on which link you think is missing. The link is there in the DNA similarities and the fossil record of ancient hominins and ancient humans dating back to species such as australopithecus all the way up to cro-magnon man is one of the most complete out of any other species. We know less about how sparrows evolved than humans.
Of course there will be gaps in a fossil record when only a tiny fraction of bones ever become fossilized. It seems you have very archaic ideas about where the science of this is at. "The missing link" ship sailed a long time ago. We know for certain the most recent other species ancestors of modern human thanks to modern scientific disciplines like archeogenetics.
I won’t debate this with you. Missing link = the missing bone pieces, not frauds as in the past with 1 complete intact skeleton. Proving the theory. Until then it is a theory. Hyjacking the way the language is used. I understand there are spins with things.
You won't debate it because you can't. Near complete skeletons of Australopithecus, Homo erectus, Neanderthals and other ancient hominins have been discovered along with a multitude of bones and even artifacts made by them.
I'm not hijacking language, I am merely stating etymological facts. Denial doesn't bode well for you.
At some point you are just going to have to accept that which reliable evidence exists for.
Yeah, but what they’re looking for is the bones that show a mutation has taken place resulting in a new species.
They don’t have it, they never will because it doesn’t exist. They have even tried to lie, substituting a pig bone for the supposed genuine article roughly 100 years ago.
Take trout. There are brown trout, steelhead trout, brook trout. They all have a common ancestor. That ancestor was a fish.
No where, literally no where in the fossil record do we have evidence of a fish becoming an entirely new creature. We have no evidence of a fish becoming an amphibian or a bird becoming snake or whatever. The variations of trout show evolution on a micro level. However Darwinian Evolution is macro evolution.
Again. There is 0 evidence for this.
It also violates the scientific method as results must be repeatable. They can’t even prove it happened once.
Also regarding this theory is it is constantly changing. For a time Neanderthals we’re not considered human…. right up until they discovered Neanderthal DNA in current living humans. So they theory isn’t even fully developed.
Then we have the Big Bang theory. As soon as you point out the densely packed atom that exploded into the cosmos didn’t create itself and that it violates the laws of physics to have something create itself from noting. Then to satiate that problem they said molecules of nothing were rubbing together until it produced that atom. So noting + nothing = something.
Dude this is clown science. Idgaf how educated a person is, we all know that noting + nothing = nothing and that things don’t create themselves. That matter can neither be created nor destroyed.
So yeah, I can argue, I just don’t really care to with people who only know the theory of evolution and know nothing of why it’s impossible.
Then there’s the complexity of the human body. Take a look at how incredibly complex the human body is. Look at how complex DNA is. Do you seriously think those complexities resulted from a random chance event. That’s like saying a tornado went through a junk yard and the result was a fully functioning F-16. We have all the laws of physics. You seriously think that was all one wonderful accident resulting in all of life as we know it? Please. The mathematical odds or something like that occurring are so off the charts I can’t relay them.
Yet I point this out, and your response is basically: stupid Christians. No buddy. Believing anything other than creationism is stupid and mathematically impossible, it violates the laws of physics and is unprovable.
The bottom line is if something is a theory it needs to be made crystal clear it’s a theory. You can say “we think this happened…..” but once you state these things as absolute fact, once you mandate they be taught as fact and once you fail to point out criticism for said theory…you’re in the gaslighting business. You are misleading people. Not you personally, but the people responsible for making these things appear as if they are indisputable fact, when in fact there is plenty of opposition. When you then further silence any one in the scientific who raises questions and doubt, this again is brainwashing and gaslighting.
Once we are free of a God with standards who eternally punishes violators or those standards…. we can feel free to sin to our hearts content without anxiety of coming judgment.
@Exterminatore no, you actually can't because all of those points are wrong.
The current understanding of physics actually does allow substance to appear from nothing. That doesn't mean the big bang happened that way but to say it couldn't is an abnegation of the intellect. The fact is that the energy produced just after the big bang shrouds what caused it to happen, so we don't know how it happened. However, it doesn't mean we never will.
New evidence concerning the classification of a particular animal doesn't upend the entire principle of evolution. Hoaxes and attempts to cash in on reward money doesn't either.
You never can never pin down turning into a toddler from a baby, an adult from a teenager and you won't find the exact day where you suddenly woke up middle aged. Evolution is like that but on much longer time scales. The fact is we do have vast fossil records located in geological strata which display patterns of speciation from common ancestors. You never find a rabbit skeleton in the cambrian. The geological diaspora of species also support evolution. So does archeogenetics. Evolution has been reproduced in laboratories too. You are wrong that it hasn't. Micro and macro evolution are the same thing. Everything about a particular organism actually operates on a micro scale. Embryology supports this too and is further proof of evolution.
So unfortunately for you, there is only acceptance or denial and once again you are wrong about there being no evidence or Evolution violating the scientific method. The insinuations are frankly laughable.
Matter also can be created or destroyed. You're thinking of the first law of thermodynamics which relates to the total energy of a system staying the same but changing form. Energy is not matter.
People with an inchoate understanding of science shouldn't try to use it in an argument.
If I’m wrong, show me my error. Paste a link with evidence of the missing link.
The law of reclamation which is part of the laws of thermodynamics state clearly that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Every molecule in this universe that was here from the beginning is still here. Maybe in a different form, but it’s still here.
Yet, suddenly we have nothing + nothing = something.
So no, I am not wrong, I just proved it. Look it up if you don’t believe me.
Besides you’re well smart enough on your own to know that something isn’t created from nothing.
The bottom line is something outside our space/time domain MUST be responsible for all that exists because again, it is irrefutable scientific fact you can’t have something from nothing.
Look up the laws of thermodynamics and the laws of energy reclamation.
Also, according to the scientific method, results must be repeatable. This has happened with neither the Big Bang theory nor revolutionary theory.
If you want to say I’m wrong, I’m saying show me why. I already know you can’t but am willing to wait for an answer.
Show me where those 2 theories don’t violate the laws of physics.
Show me where those hypotheses have ever been repeated in a test.
Again, I already know you can’t. If I’m wrong, paste me a link and show me my error.
@Exterminatore you're misunderstanding the burden of proof. Show me where you think they violate the laws of physics.
necsi.edu/evidence-for-evolution
there's my end of the bargain upheld.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass
That isn’t the best explanation of that law, but it will work.
So mass can neither be created or destroyed. This means every atom and molecule on this planet that was here in the beginning is still here. Matter or mass can change forms. If we took explosives and blew your care to pieces. Every atom from that car still exists. It has simply changed forms.
That said, we cannot have particles of nothing creating something. Never mind nothing can’t create something. It violates the law I just pasted to have matter created.
Also, think about it. Nothing rubbed together with noting and created something? Makes no sense at all.
Therefore, since matter cannot be created and since nothing cannot create something, it requires something outside of our spacetime domain to have created matter to begin with since all of this didn’t get here by itself, and I can assure you, all of the universe was not created by particles of nothing rubbing together to create an atom which exploded into all that exists.
As far as evolution there is no change of kind in the fossil record. We can literally see evidence of evolution on one scale. For example all dog breeds came from a single ancestor. That right there is proof of DNA changes resulting in new breeds of dogs.
However they’re still dogs.
We have no evidence of a biological change in kind in the fossil record.
The article you posted was an interesting read though.
So Darwinian evolution doesn’t violate the laws of physics. That evidence simply is not repeatable according to the scientific method and it does not demonstrate a change in kind in the fossil record even once, let alone multiple times.
The Big Bang Theory does violate the laws of physics however.
@Exterminatore no, no. Energy. ENERGY. Understand the concept before you try to opine.
What do you expect to find? A bone which is half way between a fish and a giraffe? You clearly don't comprehend the time scale involved in speciation. Every animal born is essentially the same as it's parents. The changes are so gradual that you will never find the kind of fossils you demand. But it HAS already been proven through archeogenetics, the geographical diaspora of animal species, the fossil record, geological epochs etc etc. Experiments which have documented actual unaided evolution have been performed and they have confirmed that evolution by natural selection happens. All of embryology, virology and every biological discipline comes out with resukts that work time after time and it is because the basis for all biological discovery is evolution and understanding genetics.
You're painfully ignorant and clearly in serious denial.
The big bang doesn't violate the laws of physics either. There are various theories based on the actual laws of physics which allow it to happen.
No. If you dial 666 you won't get Gavin Newsom on the phone so it can't be the Devil's number.
Don’t insult the Devil by associating Gavin’s name with his lol
Well, that's what they say (777) is also the devil's number) but, I don't believe in the devil so, other than maybe joking about it being the devil's number, it's just another number, to me.
It's the bus number to peninsula called Hell. Start bus station of 666 isn't far from my home and Hell (Hel) is 67km away.
Vicarious fili dei, or “instead of the Son of God”in Latin, strangely adds up to 666 if you count the Roman numerals. Vicarious Fili Dei is on the triple crown. Yeah I believe it’s the devils number.
Loqueris Latine?
FYI
Revelation was written in Greek. You’d have to count Greek letters and that and Hebrew are the only 2 alphanumeric languages I know of.
It says the number of his name will be 666. This most likely means in Greek, the alphanumeric numbers, his name will add up to 666 with them in that language.
Also Antichrist would be best stated as “the instead of Christ”. You touched on that nicely in your post.
666=1+2+3+…+36=36*(1+36)/2. It’s a triangular number! I bloody love numbers that mean something special in maths! No, I doubt 666 is the Devil’s number, because it’s very easy to derive. Nowhere in the Qur’ān does it say such a thing.
i don't believe in the devil. 666 is just a number. If you're kid has a 666 birth mark under the hair I guess it would be a little creepy but that's all. It wouldn't bother me.
I don't know about that, but it does make me think about The Heretic Anthem
Nope. It's just a number, just like 13 , and you know! Black cats 😂 666-999 and BOOOOOOO 👻
Well if you believe in the devil it’s because you’re a Christian and base your findings on the Bible. So yes, it’s spelled out in the Bible that it’s the number of the antichrist.
Nope. The number is the numerical equivalent of Nero's name in Hebrew. Other early manuscripts have 616, which is the numerical equivalent of Nero's name in Latin.
The only thing is Latin is not an alphanumeric language. Hebrew and Greek are, and Revelation was originally written in Greek.
So, that said, Nero (not his real first name, but one used by historians) could not possibly add up to 666 or 616 because Latin is not an alphanumeric language and when scripture is speaking of calculating the number of his name, it’s more than just counting 6 letters + 6 letters + 6 letters. Each letter in Greek (a different alphabet than the Latin alphabet were conversing with now) also has a numerical value associated with each letter The same is true in Hebrew. So you’d need to know the Greek alphabet and what numbers are assigned to what letters to be able to calculate the number of the name of the beast.
No. It's (202) 456-1111
My tattoos are going to be based off of Ryomen Sukuna and I'll have a 666 somewhere just for fun.
No. It’s the mark of the beast, a separate individual from the Devil.
Most likely anything 6, lol 😂
For all I know, 600 is just as bad lol 😆
No, it is just another childish lie that Christians have been brainwashed by.
Do you feel better now that you got that out? Yeah? Good. Now go an freely indulge in whichever sin or sins you enjoys so much you will not bend the knee to Christ.
I understand you don’t like Jesus. His edicts get in the way of your enjoyment of sin. His repeated threats of judgment for the unrepentant terrify you inwardly as you wait in expectation for those judgments to be cast.
Or you can skip all that, come down off your high horse, forsake your sin and ask Christ to be your lord and savior. He will be your lord whether you like it or not.
Atheists be all: “I don’t hate Jesus, I can’t hate someone I don’t believe in.” Also atheists: “the Bible is a bunch of BS.” One that apparently has enough substance in it to make you people tear it up in a public display of pride and contempt.
yep, mark of the beast
the same one that influences society to make the wrong decisions
exactly, what do you think blocks the truth
it does but the influence comes from somewhere is what i believe
No it's mans number any one who take that number on forehead or hand damns their Soul to the lake of fire
It is a fertilizer number 6% nitrogen, 6% phosphorous, 6% potassium. 666 fertilizer is very popular at garden centers.
I was told it was 313 or something close to it
Yeah it's a good. number lol
No, that's just silly. The devil isn't real.
Yes, it is.
It’s actually 222.
No more so than any other number.
No, thsi is just superstition
sweet!
Nope just a even one
Yes it is
It's just a number.
www
666
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions