According to a systematic and teleological, but still traditional, interpretation of the biblical texts, it all comes down basically to one fundamental assumption: that men and women were made to complement each other in the big plan of forming a stable family, reproducing and raising children who will maintain this foremost aim, the natural multiplication of the species.
Therefore, sex is a means to an end, and it is “consecrated” by that high purpose of guaranteeing a succession of the people's lineages in a smooth, “civilized” way.
Well, I can even understand why an ancient tribal people constantly on the brink of extinction and totally subject to the odds of a cruel Nature could've come to that conclusion.
Modern homophobes will probably not admit that, though, and they will go on talking about how unnatural and unethical homossexuality is, while they keep on masturbating, using contraceptive methods, having sex before marriage and making sexual acts that do not predispose to reproduction, all those attitudes that just like homossexuality are decried as punishable sins in the Bible.
They probably do not want to see it, because it is comforting for them to believe everything is “biblically fine” for them because they are straight… but that is the only common note among all those proscribed sinful acts: they do not contribute to population maintenance and growth and do not have a potential to end up with a lawful child being raised respectably by mommy and daddy. With these acts humans dare to make sex only for personal pleasure and physical affection.
That is in my opinion the real core of the issue the authors of the Bible originally has against homossexuality.
The problem is that most homophobes DO NOT consider homossexuality a sin just because of religious considerations. They do so because of ingrained prejudices and a profound and self-centered desire to control the behavior and beliefs of everyone in society to become a mirror image of their own values and preferences. They often also need a scapegoat for some frustrations they have at observing how society is full of evils and disorder. They usually want some sense of homogeneity, conformity.
And people who do not live by the usual standards that organize and perpetuate the basic institution of a society (family) must seem like the perfect scapegoat and the worst threat to their cherished notion of order. It is more about a certain moral collectivism/tribalism than about religion
25 Reply- +1 y
That makes a lot of sense and I agree. Its always felt like it wasn't really about religion and something else.
- +1 y
It makes me afraid to tell my family. :(
- +1 y
I found that it made little difference in my family, since it's already too broken for it to matter much, but they do judge based on this rubbish and there seems to be no reasoning with them; they can never understand why their regurgitated apologetic arguments don't work, and even when I can convince them that a particular argument doesn't work, the next time we talk they bring it up again like groundhog day, over and over, they learn nothing. They're so emotionally bothered that their loved one won't be "saved" by a figment of their imagination that they're not even theologically literate in, that they can't see my actual needs. They say they don't judge, but I know these people, all they really do is judge others and never really themselves. It's how I learned that perpetual victims are mostly victims of themselves, even when there's an understandable beginning to it all.
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yI'd argue that that same part of the Bible which says a man shouldn't lie with another man as he would with a woman also says polyester should carry the death penalty, as should crop rotation, but THOSE never get criticized- on religious grounds, at least; I'm sure the fashion police say otherwise. And, indeed, that the New Testament says that- well, I'm not here to argue scripture.
Ultimately, the reason isn't religion, it's social conservativsm, and that's the case regardless of religion. Basically every surviving human society is set up to protect and provide for women, who're the reproductive bottleneck. That sociopolitical mindset is centered around the notion that men should struggle and sacrifice for the sake of their children (which makes sense) and for women as the source of children, even if they're not connected to the man (which doesn't, beyond immediate evolutionary concerns). This is why we have the White Feather campaign and pretty much all of modern Feminism (on women's side, it's why we have slut-shaming and derision for being childless, since those women aren't fulfilling their designated role, either).
Homosexuality short-circuits that; you're operating outside the standing order. You're not giving society children, and you're not giving women the same level of veneration, handed to them for reasons outside of their control. This is also why no society in human history has ever punished female homosexuality more harshly than male (sometimes it's equal, but usually more mildly). You even have the modern attitude of "it doesn't matter if it's with another woman", which has SOME basis in biology, since you're obviously not going to get a pregnancy from that, but imagine how you'd feel if you were a committed husband whose wife was cheating on him with another woman, or a loving woman forced apart from your female paramour, and your objections were rebuffed with "it doesn't matter; it's just another woman". Wanton disregard for feelings, bonds, and the sacredness of love. Bleh.
This is why God gave us Fred Rogers. More importantly, this is why Fred Rogers gave us Fred Rogers. See, I disagree with your assertion that there's nothing to be hoped for from this world. Yes, it's a place of needless suffering and miserable evil. But from a Christian viewpoint, that's exactly the kind of place that needs love and compassion. We can't stop all the pain, or avert all the evil, but we CAN make a difference. Mister Rogers showed us that.
00 Reply
- 591 opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic.
+1 yI understand God sees all sin as equivalent. It's sort of... it is or it isn't.
I think the issue is more that the persons are sinning against themselves... defiling their own bodies.
People will do all sorts of awful things to themselves and others and justify it. These are, generally speaking, emotional issues, self image issues. I'm not talking only about gender/sex, think broadly.
I said a long time ago what your issue is but I'm not sure you see it, because that's how wounds work... they sort of define your image. You were abused and it made an emotional impression... trauma. Seek help for that so you can get your life back on track.
There are girls out here occasionally that talk the same way you do, about what they need. You are young still, not fully developed and you have some emotional trauma that is guiding you down this path. Find people that recovered from this stuff, and seek help... is my opinion.
It's your life. I'm only speaking as one that had issues, not gay, but bad all the same. Trauma is trauma...
00 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
18Opinion
- 4.4K opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic.
+1 ybecause... religion said gay people NOT equivalent evil as murder. what it did say, if i quote will get censored so look for yourself in book romans chapter 1, 27-28.
what you call "hate, the judgment, the lack of understanding" we are taught OOPOSITE to "hate sin but not the sinner" jesus loved the sinner... not hated.
that does not mean agree they can continue to sin! still no hate. your false accusation is called a strawman liberals invented. no judgement only god is the judge but we do believe the BOOK judged them.
we UNDERSTAND people are tempted to sin... no "lack if understanding" but the same as i can't cheat on my girl friend they also have rules they must follow.00 Reply
+1 yWell... the short answer is that most of human history was an intense, grinding, punishing struggle for survival. If you wanted your genetics to live on, you have to have children. For most of human history, you needed to have a man and woman to have children. Religions want their beliefs to survive, so they need children to continue the belief system. Homosexual couples weren't able to produce kids, so the tribal people had little use for them, because they were consuming resources that could have been used by reproductively viable people (which is a lot like murder, when times get tough).
You have been fortunate enough to live in an extraordinarily gentle and prosperous time and place in human history (really, the last 50 years in the Western World); religions like Christianity, Islam and Buddhism were not created in this time or place.
11 Reply- +1 y
and before they had ivf labs for artificial baby.
+1 yThey can't even admit that omniscience means that all good and evil is from their God by choice, and that unless there was no other way to do things (in which case their God isn't all powerful, but subject to limitation) then their creator is ultimately responsible and morally culpable for all the evil. This God of theirs, sat down and thought about it, and then decided that dogs and cats should clean their assholes with their tongues... ~85% of people are stupid.
13 Reply- +1 y
I definitely agree with that. They always talk about God's great plan. How people dying early is apart of God great plan. Which always made me question was my trama apart of God's great plan? (For explanation. I was R*ped by my best friend when I was 12)
- +1 y
I come from a traumatised family (sadistic psychopath), so I suppose I've seen problems that can't be brushed aside with "God never gives more than you can handle" and "it's all a part of God's plan" nonsense. I think that stuff, for those who can believe it without all the cognitive dissonance a smart person always has, makes them feel a child-like safety under the watchful eye of a parental figure. Some kids have a hard time giving up a comfort blanket, most don't even realise their religion is just that. There's some wisdom in there, yes, but it doesn't strike me as miraculous. If you treat any text as if it can't be wrong, you'll find a way to interpret it that superficially sounds amazing but falls apart under intense scrutiny.
- +1 y
culpable? that is very indirect. the one who PARKED in the handicap spot is the ONE who must pay the fine for his own action, not the DRIVING TEACHER.
because key reason of life is reproducing but homosexual sex is unfruithfull and as more people goes homo the population decreases in a way that is some kind of murder too, religion looks at woman having another guy and the man letting it (in short cuck) as equal to murder too.
00 Reply- 1K opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic.
+1 yBecause their precious little god they've brainwashed themselves with supposedly told them in a dusty old book that being gay is a huge sin!! He also said eating shrimp is a sin but nobody seems to give a fuck about that one. Apparently, greed and severely fucking over your own family isn't a sin, either.
05 Reply- +1 y
If being gay is such a huge sin, why did god create so many of them?
- +1 y
how can you equate? shrimp some orthodox jews do care about, others say it was only symbolic or for israelite but not for world but intimacy is much more serious.
your question assumed god "created them that way" as if they cannot choose. but they chose. - +1 y
@strateguy632 No, you DON'T choose. You either are or aren't!
- +1 y
You can't choose to be gay. It isn't something you can switch on and off
- +1 y
Correct! When I hear someone ask a gay person what made them turn gay, I respond with, "What made you turn straight?" Suddenly, they shut up because they can't come up with an answer!
- 447 opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic.
+1 yThe bible doesn't talk about homosexuality, as the concept of sexualities didn't exist back than.
Most of whats pulled from the bible in regards of homosexuality is just misunderstanding, false interpretation or deliberate spreading of lies.
https://youtube. com/@maklelan? si=rxe_nbJsm_gXiqd_
Prof. Dan Maklelan explains this in detail.01 Reply- +1 y
i do not know what ideas you refer to do but the action they do existed and was taught about it.
401 opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic. Because the people who wrote the Bible didn't want the girls in their community thinking they might be gay, in case those girls every wanted to randomly bang someone.
00 ReplyWell a gayness is a birth defect, but yea religions see gay acts as an evil things.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YdKzpV7sa1000 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 y"Religions" are variable and can have values that are both right and wrong. The faith of Christianity sees the sexual behavior of homosexuality to be wrong, as well as abortion. Christians are taught by the Bible to LOVE those who are homosexuals and baby killers, and to HATE the actual ACTS of those two things.
10 Reply3.8K opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic. The same reason a gardener see's all weeds as problems that need to be destroyed and removed - even though they are plants.
Just because you are, doesn't mean everyone must respect that, or be happy where you are.
This is why humans have survived for centuries. But will likely not last the next couple of centuries as we've allowed all sorts of weeds to grow unchecked.
02 Reply- +1 y
I get that. It's just people talk about the golden rule to treat others how you want to be treat. So you treat everyone with respect. But I almost never see it anymore. Unfortunately.
By weeds grow unchecked, what would be the solution? Cut the weeds? - +1 y
Then by your logic, why not treat murderers and cannibals "with respect"? They've evolved "like lions" and we don't prosecute and jail lions for killing rival lions and eating their children if needs be.
Respect is useless in this day and age as anyone can appear to be anything and their only rule is to be "legal". This is why democracies are crime ridden and fail. You cannot give a policeman and thief the same rights, but expect only "good" outcomes.
- 4.5K opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic.
+1 yIt's deeply disgusting and against nature.
A man isn't suppose to be putting his penis inside another man or do anything sexual with a man.
God created and gave man a woman for a reason.02 Reply- +1 y
So I should force myself to be with a women even if I don't want to. there's so much more evil and disgusting acts in this world than being gay. If God didn't want me to be gay, then he wouldn't have given me the trama that he did as a child. God has a great plan, he knows all. He knew this would happen. So if he didn't like it, why doesn't he change it?
- +1 y
you wrote "if I don't want to." the bible provides for such people "stay single" in book corinthians.
2.3K opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic. There is not a clear answer to that. A variety of issues factor in to why certain religions are intolerant of homosexuality.
The answer lies somewhere in the history of the civilisations which inspired those religious scriptures.
02 Reply- +1 y
intolerant? the question was if as evil as murder. intolerance is what fascist italians did, under mussolinin but christians are not like that toward gay so not "intolerant". just not agree. like if i vote trump are you "intolerant" if you do not agree with me? be tolerant!
- +1 y
@strateguy632 Yes, to see homosexuality as an evil equivalent to that of murder is to be intolerant of homosexuality. Just simply language. I don’t make the rules.
- 377 opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic.
+1 ya lot of the gay people i've talked to aren't attracted to gay people. they are attracted to straight people and that's a problem.
00 Reply
+1 yBecause ‘the rules’ dictate that sex and marriage are for procreation.
03 Reply- +1 y
Then plenty of Christians that maderbate or have sex not for the purpose of procreation are also in the wrong.
- +1 y
*masterbate
- +1 y
Correct.
Why do gay people see religion as equivalent evil as murder? Cuz it IS!
02 Reply- +1 y
Why though? People are just trying to make the best life they can on such a shitty world
1K opinions shared on Religion & Spirituality topic. They need someone to hate. An inner evil and outside evil (satan). Thats a cult.
02 Reply- +1 y
cult? cult means manipulating people with control. you should not name call at all and worse inacurate bname calling.
but the real cult is atheism. even secular scientists are not atheist the geniuses prefer a non-personal god to the atheism cult. lol - +1 y
@strateguy632 just calls em likes I sees them. Your immediate reaction of self defense when I’m merely attacking ideas is another red flag.
+1 yOHHH, FAR WORSE...
KIDDING00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yMost don't.
10 Reply
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
Why do some Christians or religious people hate the gay community more than any other "sinners"?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News