Why are most women seemingly incapabable of the deep streams of consciousness most men are?

[Anonymous]

It's rare for women to delve deep into philosophy or science, etc. They mostly just focus on day to day matters, themselves, and spirituality as a means of serving themselves. Manifestation in particular.

[alicat2358]

This subject has nothing to do with gender. Women probably don't talk to you about it because you assume they don't know anything about it, making then not want to open up to you on a deeper level. Talking about spirituallity is a personal subject for many, the person has to trust you and feel comfortable. re-state//background_color_rgba (0, 0, 0, 0), font_color_rgb (77, 77, 77), justifyLeft

[MasterKS]

@alicat2358 right point.

[Asker]

That's just not how it works, you can find plenty of male philosophers, scientists, even Youtubers delving into this stuff. Rarely any women

[Asker]

@MasterKS No, feel-good dribble

[Dargil]

I think many women are capable of that. Margaret Thatcher was one. But for some reason, hormones and emotions distract women from being able to have very deep critical reasoning. Unfortunately, women are unequal to men in this way as well. General Patton no doubt had an overload of testosterone. But instead of impeding his victories in the field, it enhanced them.

[ProbablyClueless]

To be honest, I'm not sure why your experiences with women would have led you to that conclusion. I've seen women to be just as capable of deep thought as men.

My experience is that many women have a great deal of streams of consciousness. Maybe it doesn't strike you as deep because of the words they use to communicate the ideas?

[Asker]

Where? Point me to a woman

[Spencer10]

Maybe women see no point in discussing topics like this with people who have already made up their minds and have a bias against women in general.

[Asker]

It's the other way around, I came to this conclusion cause they never demonstrated it

[Spencer10]

You perhaps need more critical research... I have personal experience that says otherwise.

[Asker]

Your anecdotes (which may not even exist) don't disprove the rule. Even today there's so few female scientists and philosophers

[Spencer10]

You are concluding there is a rule... there is none. Your research is flawed and biased. Go try and see what happens if you attempt to get your "rule" published in any credible research study. I can picture the professors giggling and laughing out loud while they fail you...

[Asker]

If it's not a rule then why are there so few female scientists and philosophers? Why don't people vote for women presidents? Why have men created most things? If I get laughed out the room it's because political correctness is valued over truth.

[strateguy632]

Because lady nature is the real world not boring abstract. Consistently, most lady are bored by sci fi.

[Asker]

The abstract isn't real and is boring? Seems you lack imagination

[leahzrc]

bc nobody takes women seriously

[HelpfulWoman]

XD XD XD