Search Results: arguments

Rosie O'Donnel applied for and got granted refugee status in Ireland after Trump's re-election and is currently living in Ireland has been highly critical of Trump on social media. HIS argument is, "while she was born in New York, she poses a danger to America, and should therefor be stripped of her citizenship and Ireland can keep her." And also that birthright citizenship should have never been implamented.

Should the Supreme Court make an exception here and allow Trump to violate her civil rights?

Here's the article as proof that I'm not making this up

https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-threatens-revoke-rosie-140344760.html

Under current US law, the only way a US citizen can be stripped of their citizenship, is if they immigrated and lied on their application

"Conservatives have criticized identity-based affirmative action because, they suggest, it imposes an expectation on students of color that they will represent what is presumed to be, say, the Black or Latino view on any given issue, which discourages freethinking. Admitting students for viewpoint diversity would turn the holding of conservative ideas into a quasi-identity, subject to some of the same concerns. Students admitted to help restore ideological balance would likely feel a responsibility to defend certain views, regardless of the force of opposing arguments they might encounter.

For professors hired for their political beliefs, the pressure to maintain those views would be even greater. If you had a tenure-track position, your salary, health insurance and career prospects would all depend on the inflexibility of your ideology. The smart thing to do in that situation would be to interact with other scholars who share your point of view and to read publications that reinforce what you already believe. Or you might simply engage with opposing ideas in bad faith, refusing even to consider their merits. This would create the sort of ideological echo chamber that proponents of viewpoint diversity have suggested, often with some justification, leads to closed-mindedness among left-leaning professors."

Hello I recently saw a girl I went to school with and we spoke about school and we had a little argument about something, I am talking about something that happened at high school, there was one girl at my class that we hated each other, we never spoke like regular classmates but always showing that didn't really like one another, and to be honest I always used to harass her even if just walking across her I would throw her a word like stupid or ugly or just bad morning instead of saying good morning... And don't get this wrong sometimes she did answer to speak back at me for the things I call her but we can say that she was pretty much harassed by me. So one day she was standing at the yard with her 3 friends (girls) and I passed next to her and called her stupid girl, so after 10 minutes when the break is over I went back to the class and almost everyone is there and just when I came in she came from behind me and pulled my pants and underwear down, exposing me and it took me like few seconds to realize what has just happened to me while I'm standing there with my pants and underwear to my ankles in front of everyone laughing so hard at me including her and she shouted "haha everyone look how tiny his penis is".

I pulled my pants back up and went home immediately and didn't come to school for 2 days. After that obviously I never mocked her or made fun of her again and never spoke to her again, even when she annoyed me sometimes (like calling me Mr. Small penis) but that was really few times not a lot... Some of the classmates (especially girls) thought she was right but exposing a man's genitals and penis could be the worst hit you could ever land on a man...

So girls, was she right?