Search Results: high school

Hello all.

I finished high school at 18 like everyone else with above average marks. I wanted to go to art school and become an animator. However life did not turn out the way I wanted. Due to various personal reasons which I don't want to disclose here, I was not able to go to art school and later ended up as a hikikomori (recluse).

However I did not want to remain living in the dark and watch everyone else succeed. Hence when things sorta improved in my life I tried to give another attempt to follow my artistic passion. At 25 I started drawing once again. It almost felt like learning from scratch as I had never drawn since I was 18. However as I started to draw once again a wave of nostalgia hit me. It felt as if the carefree high school kid in me was alive once again. I felt a type of happiness I had never felt in years. I knew I was on the right track!

I kept improving my art and after few months joined a 2 years diploma course in animation. It felt too late to go for a 4 years course in an art school even though they teach more in depth over there. I graduate in another year as I am already half way in. If things does go as planned and I do get a foot in the door in let's say an animation studio, I will be 28 then. Does it feel too old? Anyone else here who started their career at a later stage?

Pros of Merit Pay:

Incentivizes high performance:

Merit pay can motivate teachers to improve their skills and teaching methods to achieve better student outcomes, potentially leading to higher student achievement.

Attracts and retains talent:

By rewarding excellence, merit pay can attract and retain high-quality teachers, which can help improve the overall effectiveness of schools.

Addresses inequities:

It can potentially address disparities in teacher compensation, where teachers in higher-need schools or those with higher levels of student achievement may receive additional compensation.

Promotes accountability:

Merit pay systems can create a greater sense of accountability among teachers via salary outcomes.

Can be used to reward leadership and mentoring:

Merit pay systems can include incentives for teachers who take on leadership roles, mentor other teachers, or contribute to school-wide initiatives.

Cons of Merit Pay:

Focus on standardized tests:

Merit pay systems that rely heavily on student test scores incentivize teachers to "teach to the test," narrowing the curriculum

Potential for administrative bias:

Evaluation processes can be subjective leading to biased outcomes, unfairly penalizing certain teachers or rewarding others disproportionately.

Negative impact on collaboration:

Merit pay systems can create a competitive environment where teachers are less likely to share resources or collaborate with each other.

Administrative burden:

Implementing and maintaining merit pay systems can be complex and time-consuming.

May not accurately reflect teacher effectiveness:

Standardized test scores may not be the best indicators of a teacher's overall effectiveness or contributions to student learning.

May not address underlying problems:

Merit pay systems may not effectively address the root causes of low student achievement, such as inadequate resources, lack of support for struggling students, or systemic inequities.