Search Results: from here

for decades, entire generations of boys were raised to be soft, to never stand up for themselves against someone "less privileged" than them, to be as far away from toxic masculinity as possible

then over time everyone and their grandpa can observe women chasing after bad boys, doesn't matter whether they're a godly Christian woman or a hardcore Marxist feminist

you would think with all this complaining about toxic masculinity, that women especially feminists would want nothing to do with it at all

no amount of gaslighting can cover up what everyone can blatantly see with their own eyes, yes there here women complaining about Charlie Kirk being a douchebag while they lust after Hasan Piker who's a far bigger douchebag than Charlie Kirk could ever dream of becoming

the examples there are of this are so overwhelming it's laughable to suggest otherwise. in fact having the appearance of someone toxically masculine is already enough to get women wet

this also further bleeds into politics too with so many examples of far-left women defending the far-right politics of other ethnicities

and in recent years cops have become soft on crime due to feminist policies but you know what happens to soft cops and who's ready to defund these soft cops?

then there's also countless examples in fiction I don't even know where to begin

women falling for toxic masculine men is just a fact at this point

I could post more if not for the 2000 character limits

Apparently there's various verses in Gnostics gospels I've read online, from the multiple books, 📚 📖 religion aside, just from a character study point of view for a tick here:

And hell lol 😆 😈 👀 the texts even open up to their own weird can of worms of cliffhangers: like Seinfeld, was the whole "a Christian story or Gnostic story" all a show about nothing, a tale about nothing - it's almost like the whole "sins on the cross" was just a going through the motions, ticking a box ☑️ lol. I mean read the Google AI, results, thank you. Keywords imply. Lol.

The gnostics almost seem to fill in some otherwise now obvious gaps - rarely is Jesus shown expressing emotions, let alone flippant emotions, in mainstream gospels. In Gnostic gospels, the guy practically comes across as a comedian almost a spitting image of the Pacino's Devil character in 1997's Devil's Advocate, full of sadist quick humour, sarcasm, and downright deviancy.

😆 Like the kind of low-brow, right below the belt edgy humour of someone saying basically "so it's like reading something epic like Star Wars, yet it's just the same old same old, yet as if the star is a edgy comedian giving a long running show routine about edgy one liner's and punchlines" - lol 😆 Gnostic Jesus, what a beast 🤪🫡

And I like it 😂 😆 or found it amusing and bemusing. Gnostic Jesus really is his own kettle of fish (an expression, he really is something unique) compared to "the Jesus we know" in mainstream Mark, Matthew, Like and John (and technically, Acts and Romans the other main texts / Paul's stuff).