Search Results: how long will i live

Asymmetric romantic attraction is one person has feelings and the other does not. The person who has feelings isn’t thinking clearly because chemicals are (naturally) being released in their brains compromising their judgment. But the other person can see everything as plain as day because they aren’t attracted to them hence little/no brain chemicals.

So person who has no feelings has to make a decision on how to handle a person they have influence over. The moral thing to do is be tactfully honest with the other person (and do it early). But we don’t live in a moral world so the following usually happens:

Scenario #1: Man manipulates the woman into sex when she is thinking there is going to be a relationship. Worst case scenario he gets her pregnant and abandones her.

Scenario #2: Woman manipulated the man into thinking she likes him when she doesn’t. She does this for attention, favors, free meals, free counseling, etc (stereotypical friéndzone).

Worst case scenario is she is a gold digger. Yeah she has to give him up to him at the point but she gets a huge payout for faking it. She will likely divorce him and screw him over in alimony (and she likely cheated during the marriage). She never had feelings for at all. Just a good actress.

Now roles can be reversed at times. Some women do use men only for sex and some men do seek out “suger mamas”. Some men do friéndzone women for their own ends. However for is just not as common. However I will say it is at least biologically natural to want to have sex with someone even if you don’t want a relationship. However using a person for money, ego, attention, favors, etc is downright conceited.

Anyway I got in a long “debate” with a feminist on here who believed that men should be held liable if they mislead a woman into sex. But she had no problem with women taking advantage of men via the friéndzone or worse (gold diggers). Not kidding.

I argue that BOTH genders need to watch out for themselves.

Me personally I want equality. Equality says that everyone has the same opportunities at the beginning, and how hard you work in life determines your course. Equity on the other hand says it does not matter how hard you work, we are all the same at the end. A translation for rational thinking people, it means you could have highly specialized talent, and be making 6 figures per year, but because your neighbor is a bum, and chooses not to work, most of your money is stripped from you and given to them.. It's the basic premise of communism. No matter how hard you work you Can not earn more than a bum, so what's the point of working hard. One of many reason communism and socialism does not work is because of that right there.. There is no incentive to be the best you can be, and the government takes it all. In a communist government the mantra 'you will own nothing and like it' is a thing. Suddenly your business is no longer yours, your family home which has been in your family for 100+ years is no longer yours.

Sorry I would rather live in a equality driven free society, not what some of these idiotic equity driven radical leftist feminists want. The people who want that shit have never known hardship.