Search Results: men and their age

This is my own quote I said in response to all the simps in my last question, who "don't see a problem" with thots and E-whores on sites like OnlyFans, as well as other scammers, and criminals and scumbags in society.

Pathetic, PATHETIC men (in their 30s and 40s, mind you) saying sh*t like "If it's easy and you can make money doing it, why not do it?" and "blame Capitalism." I also told them by their own logic, I should shoot them in the face and rob them cause "it's easy, so why not do it?" I mean, do I really have to explain to "adults" why selfishness and laziness are not good traits to have?

I get so many people nowadays have no personal code of ethics, or morals, self-respect, or adult responsibilities. But seeing so many pathetic simp men, thots, and overall scumbags, is depressing. So I gave that quote as an easy way to sum up how I feel.

I know this post is kind of a half rant, but I want to know your take on this quote of mine.

Let’s be clear. There is a fundamental difference between someone disagreeing with you vs. being a douche and insulting. Some people think that getting the answer they don’t want to hear is “trolling”. It’s not.

Trolling is when you are just being a douche who put zero thought into what the other person is saying and/or their position.

For example if I see an overweight girl post about “being picky” (yes I have seen this) I won’t insult her appearance. But I will tell her the truth that she has two options: she can either improve her physique or she can stay as is but she has to lower her standards. I won’t day something stupid like “just get on a treadmill you fat ass”. There are minority of guys out there who do that but its rare

But I notice many women on here who troll and tear into men with little regard over things guys have little control over (age, height, etc.). The word “creep” is there ace hole in one insult and they will use it despite the guy not saying anything sexual (it’s based on their bs “feelings”)

A study was just released stating that by the year 2030, over 52% of women between the ages of 23-44 would not be able to get married and would not be able to have children as a result. With so many younger women nowadays not being able to successfully find love/marriage with someone who is willing to commit and have children, is it time to legalize plural marriage in America by at least allowing it to be an option or alternative for those who choose? Whether it’s something the rest of society agrees with or not in their personal life, or whether a person would or wouldn’t be involved in plural marriage themselves, is irrelevant. The question is simply this… Is it consistent under equal application or equal protection of the law that government should no longer unconstitutionally prohibit the legal practice of plural marriage, aka polygyny? The way it is currently with the anti bigamy laws, it seems very hypocritical and it can be argued that government is applying protections of law only to certain groups who cry for equality the loudest! So to recap, if a man is already married to one woman and she gives permission for him to be in a second or third marriage to an additional woman in each marriage, assuming they are all of legal age and everyone consents without duress of their own free will, why shouldn’t he and the new wife be able to also show up at any county courthouse in America and request an additional marriage license? US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in his own dissenting opinion regarding the LGBTQ legal marriage decision made it clear from a legal standpoint on how the court would most likely rule should a case for plural marriage ever be brought before the court when he said “It is striking how much of the majority’s reasoning would apply with equal force to the claim of a fundamental right to plural marriage.”