Search Results: religious acts

I don’t even think it’s possible to be ‘equal.’
Men must lead, almost all of the successful relationships have a man leading the relationship. Men act out of honour and duty, we have greater physical and mental strength. Whereas women act out of emotion.

Women in the comments might get upset, but it proves how women act out of emotions instead of truth and morality.
Men lead and women follow. Even in religious scriptures it goes, God, man, woman and then children. Men died on the titanic because they acted out of duty and responsibility.

We’re not equal, women give life and nurture and men have provide and protect. Even these feminists know deep down behind their ignorance and delusion.

In fact men are only loved on the fact we provide security, value and protect women.

How can anyone deny this?

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-same-sex-couples_n_6481d91de4b025003edbde97#
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Discrimination Of Same-Sex Couple

The Supreme Court on Friday greatly expanded the rights of people who want to discriminate against same-sex couples in a case involving an amateur website designer who was never even asked to make a website for a same-sex wedding.

In 303 Creative v. Elenis, amateur web designer Lori Smith asked the court to grant her the right under the First Amendment to refuse service to gay and lesbian couples due to her Christian religious beliefs. But Smith’s request was wholly speculative. She had not been hired to make a website for a same-sex couple and, therefore, had never refused such work. In fact, she’s never made a single wedding website.

Despite the underlying claim being totally made up, the court sided with Smith’s religious liberty argument. In a 6-3 vote, the court’s conservatives ruled that a civil rights law in Colorado that bars anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination violated Smith’s First Amendment speech rights. In doing so, they made it much easier for businesses to discriminate. A new wave of litigation further expanding discrimination is likely to follow.
Smith had claimed that Colorado’s anti-discrimination act, which prohibits denial of goods, services or facilities “because of disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, or ancestry,” violated her First Amendment rights by requiring her to take commissions with what she said was a message she did not agree with — specifically, websites celebrating the weddings of same-sex couples.