Search Results: short

I honestly believe Brock Lesnar’s retirement feels incredibly rushed. Looking at his physique, it really feels like he still had 3 to 4 good years of wrestling left in him, with plenty of major blockbuster matches left in the tank.

At the end of the day, if this retirement is what HE wanted, then it's the best thing for him. We all know Brock has never been a "company guy"—he actually does whatever he wants. What he did out there at WrestleMania was completely unscripted and not planned at all, but he went ahead and did it anyway! After that, he was essentially contractually obliged to perform at SummerSlam in Minnesota.

But looking closely at those last few performances, while he might still be physically capable, mentally he looks completely done. His matches became highly predictable with the exact same repetitive moves, and he wasn't really trying anything new, which usually means he is just no longer interested in the business.

I know some people have pushed back on this take, saying: "Just because he's in great shape doesn't mean he can wrestle for 3–4 more years. He can't go for longer than 10 minutes anymore. Accept that he's done and move on."

Where do y'all stand on this? Do you think Brock actually cut his career short while he still had a few good years left in him, or do you agree that he was mentally and physically checked out and it was the perfect time to walk away?

This is the woman on trial for murdering her three children by strangling. At the time I am writing this, the jury is out making the decision. The choices are life in prison or a long time in a mental hospital. There is also another choice, which is that she could be found guilty just of manslaughter, which would probably result in her being kept in prison for a shorter period of time. There are no other alternatives at this point. Given what you know about this case, or maybe what you don't know, which alternative seems appropriate?