Search Results: all we do is argue

I mean they lose , lose again , and continue to run. Maybe they think enough illegals will get in country to vote them in. I love the ones that get 1% support and just keep wasting family members money running. I mean if you can't win Mayor race or any office in your own state , how could you possibly win presidential election?

What will be really bad is Harris will run for President and still get 1 % support. No one liked her then and no one likes her now. Even I thought she would be better than she has as Vice President. She can't speak at all. I thought she was an idiot on committees , but she seemed to be able to speak. Now I don;t know how she ever became a Lawyer. You can bet she didn't argue cases in court. She would lose every time.

Pierre is a real loser. i think she is the worse Press Sec of all time. She mostly lies. Doesn't understand the questions she gets asked. She got her on because she is a Lesbian and a minority and it shows. She makes $180,000 . I could not with a good conscience accept that.

A study was just released stating that by the year 2030, over 52% of women between the ages of 23-44 would not be able to get married and would not be able to have children as a result. With so many younger women nowadays not being able to successfully find love/marriage with someone who is willing to commit and have children, is it time to legalize plural marriage in America by at least allowing it to be an option or alternative for those who choose? Whether it’s something the rest of society agrees with or not in their personal life, or whether a person would or wouldn’t be involved in plural marriage themselves, is irrelevant. The question is simply this… Is it consistent under equal application or equal protection of the law that government should no longer unconstitutionally prohibit the legal practice of plural marriage, aka polygyny? The way it is currently with the anti bigamy laws, it seems very hypocritical and it can be argued that government is applying protections of law only to certain groups who cry for equality the loudest! So to recap, if a man is already married to one woman and she gives permission for him to be in a second or third marriage to an additional woman in each marriage, assuming they are all of legal age and everyone consents without duress of their own free will, why shouldn’t he and the new wife be able to also show up at any county courthouse in America and request an additional marriage license? US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in his own dissenting opinion regarding the LGBTQ legal marriage decision made it clear from a legal standpoint on how the court would most likely rule should a case for plural marriage ever be brought before the court when he said “It is striking how much of the majority’s reasoning would apply with equal force to the claim of a fundamental right to plural marriage.”