Search Results: strong women

What I mean by that is just because men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks get swarmed by lots of women and thus marks them as the top 10% of men (or the top tier men) doesn't actually mean, that the conventional, every-day girl wants to go after them too and that it is the same as saying Belle Delphine and SSSniperwolf are getting lots of men and thus marks them as the top 10% of women (or the top tier women) and it doesn't mean, that the conventional, every-day boy wants to go after them too.

I never spent any money on only fans nor did I ever order their bath water and after seeing just 2 minutes of SSSniperwolf I clicked away because she's way too annoying.

In essence it can be said, that women, who collectively go after the top tier men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks are basically female sycophants in the same way as men, who collectively throw their money at the top tier women like Belle Delphine or SSSniperwolf are sycophants.

Losers

What do you think?

For the record I am definitely guilty of:

• Posting about politics (often)
• Using profanity
• Getting in heated (even hateful) arguments
• Talking in depth about dirty/explicit sexual topics for entertainment. However I do much less of that nowadays.

But I remember first posting on GAG literally 14 years ago. Back then it really was more focused about dating and romance issues. Never posted about politics or anything unrelated outside men and women interacting.

I was also more open back then. This included admitting difficult (and embarrassing issues). Insecurities I was struggling with. But nowadays I’m rarely if ever that open. Reason being I am usually not in the mood to get blasted by some idiot troll.

Anyway I got in a real heated argument with one person on GAG yesterday. She unnecessarily hit a very deep nerve with me at the wrong moment. I responded back with sheer vitriol and wished the worst on here (which I later recanted). It wasn’t productive for anyone either way. Not good for her. Not good for me. Not good for anybody who read it.

However that made think harder. What if there was version of GAG that:

• Didn’t allow any slurs, labels, insults, explicit profanity. You can still post it but it the word will immediately get censored.
• Only focused on relationship issues
• Would only allow a PG version of sexual issues
• Wouldn’t allow any postings/opinions about politics (no matter where you stand).
  
  

Sure it sounds really boring and dull at first. But I can’t help but wonder how many people give up on this website at some point. Especially women. Or how many people come here just to “ventilate” vitriol. Or how many people come here for “talk” porn.

What about people who just want to post honest questions and get honest (respectful) responses. A respectful response isn’t always what you want to hear but what you NEED to hear. The difference is knowing the poster really wants to help you vs. enjoying throwing shade.

I have seen many men Crash and Burn when it came to Basic visitation Rights. And how they In some cases even kill the child's father, for wanting to spend quality time with his children.

• If a man wants to be there for his children, They won't allow him (mainly The Mother)
• If he wants to be Part if his child's life , she denied him the Access.
• Father's who "want" to be there, are not allowed

Yes. Many women feel that Children need a Father figure... True , I won't deny that. And I would not take it away from them.

my Issue that I have.

these Same People feel that Yes a child needs a father figure. "but that it does not have to be The Biological Birth-Father.

Two common yet contradictory complaints women have about men is that they are hitting on them and that they are not hitting on them.

But which one do you find more annoying?

For the record, I’m not talking about women finding peace after being assaulted,

Im talking about the “strong woman” and other stuff.