Is marking men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks as highly desirable men the same as marking Belle Delphine or SSSniperwolf as highly desirable women?

Unit1

What I mean by that is just because men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks get swarmed by lots of women and thus marks them as the top 10% of men (or the top tier men) doesn't actually mean, that the conventional, every-day girl wants to go after them too and that it is the same as saying Belle Delphine and SSSniperwolf are getting lots of men and thus marks them as the top 10% of women (or the top tier women) and it doesn't mean, that the conventional, every-day boy wants to go after them too.

I never spent any money on only fans nor did I ever order their bath water and after seeing just 2 minutes of SSSniperwolf I clicked away because she's way too annoying.

In essence it can be said, that women, who collectively go after the top tier men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks are basically female sycophants in the same way as men, who collectively throw their money at the top tier women like Belle Delphine or SSSniperwolf are sycophants.

Losers

What do you think?

Is marking men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks as highly desirable men the same as marking Belle Delphine or SSSniperwolf as highly desirable women?
Is marking men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks as highly desirable men the same as marking Belle Delphine or SSSniperwolf as highly desirable women?
Makes sense to me
I don't think so
Something else
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Is marking men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks as highly desirable men the same as marking Belle Delphine or SSSniperwolf as highly desirable women?
5 Opinion