Search Results: lack of trust

Large number of orphaned and foster kids in the USA alone, let alone the world. Some additional number of parents are not useful and detrimental.

Many people have good homes, successful, sufficient land and resources and skills to raise kids. We all have extra space and capacity, most of us... if we opened our minds a bit.

Would you be more likely to take in.. adopt, sponsor, become parents or mentors of young children... who go house to house begging for such support?

Children come with a govt identity card indicating critical information, trust is ensured. Children would be given a list of homes where there are decent, successful people assumably, driven around by volunteer good semaritans, and provided volunteer case working to protect their interests.

Children could choose which parents they feel comfortable with, should the new parents accept them. If doesn't work out, they are returned to go look for new parents.

At minimum... people can provide resources...$, food, clothes, knowledge, good will.

Or would you rather have them hidden out of sight and ignore the reality of these people who lack support and resources, relying on the government to take care of them?

Your job would be to take them on, yes you have to pay for them, maybe the govt helps some. There's no free lunch...

someone is going to argue... adopt? We'll, maybe you want to... but maybe some real life marketing would get you moving...

In my view one should need parental consent to own a firearm if they are under the age of 21.

In the instance of parental consent this would have prevented a lot of school shootings operating under the assumption that most of these kids were loners and would not have otherwise had the proper connections to secure a firearm illegally.

Therefore I conclude this change in law could very well have made a difference, while still protecting the rights of law abiding citizens.

It is for this reason I propose teenagers should not be able to legally purchase firearms for themselves.

Since teenagers are not fully mature and their brains are still developing, that is why I find it best to leave it up to the parent’s discretion as to whether or not they can own a firearm.

Considering how immature and irresponsible that most teenagers tend to be I think its naturally safest. Even if most of them don’t necessarily go on to become school shooters, they are often ill equipped in terms of the personal responsibility that would be needed to properly care for a firearm.

Especially with voting they tend to make very bad and uninformed decisions.

My point being as a recent teenager myself, I don’t trust most of my peers to act responsibly with guns or alcohol for that matter, since most of them lacked mental maturity and would likely not be handling things responsibly and safely even if they weren’t necessarily set to become school shooters.

I understand that they can still join the military at 18 and handle guns but its an entirely different situation when you are under a chain of command and supervisors that are there to discipline you, train you and hold you accountable

Everyone knows Liberal woman lack any or any moral family values, where they place an Idea of "Anything goes" or "Accepting" other people sick ways as normal behaviour. This includes infidelity where liberal woman have no ethical understanding of faithfulness in a world that empowers them to do such things "Feminism".

A conservative woman holds the family together with trusted values on what is right and wrong in a world that is polluted and sick. The conservative woman will keep family values as a true and trusted system through religious or moral means. Drawing a line between unethical behaviour and ethical behaviour that would do harm to traditional family values that Liberal women and LGBTQ people seek to destroy.

What woman would you rather date and trust to be more faithful to you?